III.

IVORY JOHN MARTIN




-92-


15.
IVORY J. MARTIN*

*Portrait and Biographical Record of Shelby and Moultrie Counties, Illinois, Chicago, 1891, pp. 160-61.

The power of the press is a trite but a forcible subject, for it is one of those themes which is constantly reinforcing itself by proving anew every day its reality. Throw out of account the influence which is exerted by the newspapers of Illinois, the destinies of the Prairie State would be largely affected by such elimination. The sketches which we have been called upon to give of the newspapers and editors of Moultrie County present matters which are of interest to everyone.

The Sullivan Progress has been from the first a success and it now occupies first rank with the best papers in this part of the State and has a well-equipped office for job work and all kinds of printing. It was originally issued in 1857 under the caption of the Express, but was soon changed in title to the name which it now bears. Mr. Martin has been its editor and manager since 1885 and added to those duties its proprietorship in 1887. It is now a seven-colunm six-page paper with a good circulation and is issued weekly. Mr. Martin, who came to Sullivan, Moultrie County, in 1883, on account of having been appointed Deputy County Clerk by Mr. Charles Shuman, took charge of this paper after the expiration of his term of office, and has now taken Mr. Shuman as his partner in the management of the business. This was his first newspaper work but he proved himself no amateur in the business.

Mr. Martin was born in Whitley Township, Moultrie County, November 7, 1859, and was there reared upon his father's farm and received his education at Lee's Academy


-93-


at Loxa, Coles County. For seven years he taught in Coles and Moultrie Counties, having taken his position at the teacher's desk before reaching the age of seventeen, obtaining his academic course during the same years that he devoted to teaching. He came of a family that has resided in the county for many years, as they settled here in the '30's.

The father, John N. Martin, was born in Coles County, this State, and was only five years old when the family removed to what is now Moultrie County. He is still carrying on the farm in Whitley Township and is the son of John Martin, a native of Kentucky, a grandson of James Martin, a Virginian, and a great-grandson of John Martin, who migrated to Kentucky about the year 1777, during the Revolutionary War. The family was there in the days of Daniel Boone and had to make their home in a fort for self protection.

The first John's son James was very young when the family came to Kentucky and he grew up near the Kentucky River and there married, and reared his family. At a very early day he came with his household to Coles County, Illinois, and later made his home near Bruce, Moultrie County, where he died in 1865, at the very venerable age of ninety-one years, having buried his wife some twenty years before. For generations, the family religion is of the old school Baptist denomination and their politics of the Democratic order.

John Martin, the grandfather of our subject was a young man when his parents came to Illinois and he here reached his majority and married a Miss Neely. Her father was known far and wide as an Indian fighter on the frontier and was an original character in the early pioneer days. In his later years John Martin removed to Whitley Township, Moultrie County, and built a mill there.

-94-


John N. Martin, the father of our subject, is one of a family of four sons and three daughters who are all living. He grew to manhood to Whitley Township and was married in Coles County to Miss Rachel Martin, who as well as her husband, is now living, having reached nearly three-score years of age. Of their children who are now living, our subject is the eldest, the others being Joel K, who is studying law under the Honorable John R. Eden, of Sullivan, and Nancy E., who is yet at home with her parents. Our subject was married in Sullivan in 1886 to Miss Rose Eden,, daughter of the Honorable John R. Eden, of whom more can be learned in the sketch of that gentleman which appears in this volume.

The subject of our sketch has ever taken an active part in local politics since he became of age, but is no office seeker. His paper is Democratic as are also his own political views. He is a man who is capable of a vast amount of hard work and he is exceedingly skillful in the management of his business. His wife was reared in Sullivan and is a graduate of the Georgetown Convent in the District of Columbia. She is an earnest member of the Christian Church and is the mother of three children Olive, Eden and Neely.

-95-


16.
MARTIN FAMILY RECORD

Ivory John Martin
Sullivan, Illinois

Table of Contents

A Preliminary Note

I.John and Sarah Scott Martin

II. Samuel Martin

Ill. William Harvey Martin

IV. The Daughters of John and Sarah Scott Martin

V. James Scott and Mary Figley Martin

VI. Five Sons of James Scott and Mary Figley Martin

A.Samuel Martin

B.Rezin C. Martin

C.James Frost Martin

D.Archibald Lane

E.Joel Figley Martin

F.John and Ann Neely Martin

1.Isabel Martin

2.James Uwis Martin

3.John Neely Martin

4. William Thomas Martin

-97-


5.Daniel Parker Martin

6.Rhoda Martin

7.Serilda Jane Martin

8.Mary Bathe/Robinson

VII.John Neely and Rachel Elvina Martin

VIII. Me, Myself

IX. The Martins -- A Recapitulation

-98-


THE MARTINS -- A FAMILY RECORD

I.J. Martin

A Preliminary Note*


*From the text of this manuscript, it appears to have been written (or completed) in 1941 (see, eg., pp. 143, 144, 146). I.J. Martin wrote another paper about the Martin family consisting of 37 long manuscript pages. It refers to Mabel George's son John "now (1943) training in an army camp." This second paper covers generally the same subject matter as the first. Where it adds additional information, the relevant text is set forth in footnotes with introductory references to "1943 text."

There is a family tradition that the first of the family to come to Virginia from England were three brothers who were perhaps unmarried at the time.** There is nothing definite known of the date of their coming. Our Kentucky ancestor, John Martin, was a descendant, perhaps a grandson, of one of these three immigrant brothers.

**1943 text: "The family tradition is that three Martin brothers came from the south of England to Virginia before the Revolutionary War perhaps three or more generations before."

There were perhaps other Martins who came to Virginia in the interval between the date of the first settlement at Jamestown and the beginning of the Revolutionary War. There was a John Martin among the founders of the Jamestown settlement, and he was a member of the first



-99-


board of directors of the colony. But he returned to England and may never have come back.

There are many people of the family name now living in Virginia as indeed everywhere else. There are some prominent people among the Virginia Martins. Some have been governors, senators and representatives. Some of them are probably of the same family to which belonged the John Martin who became a Kentucky pioneer.

The Scotts are a widely scattered people but nowhere appear so numerous as the Martins. The three Scott brothers, Andrew, Samuel, and Dodridge, who came to this county were relatives of Sarah Scott Martin. Two of the later members of this family have held county offices in Moultrie County.

I. John and Sarah Scott Martin

My family starts with the earliest paternal ancestor that I know anything about -- John Martin -- who came to Kentucky from Virginia among the first pioneers. He had married Sarah Scott, a member of the Virginia family that was later honored by the distinguished soldier General Winfield Scott*.

*1943 text: "Sarah Scott was a member of the same family to which General Scott, also a Virginian, belonged. It is said that [James Scott Martin] made a jesting remark about the defeat of the General, who was the Whig candidate for President in 1852, saying, 'If I had known that no one else was going to vote for Cousin Winfield, I would have voted for him myself.'"

-100-


This Martin family lived in a fort (or within easy reach of one) during the Indian wars that lasted until the close of the Revolutionary War.* Some of their children were born in the fort, including my great grandfather, James Scott Martin, who was born in 1779. There were six sons and perhaps as many daughters born in Kentucky, and the family lived there until after the death of John Martin.

*1943 text: "Our known history begins with John Martin and his wife Sarah Scott Martin who came to the Kentucky settlements about the year 1777. They lived in a fort on or near the Kentucky River during the period of the Indian wars."

Little is known now of him except that he was an early Kentucky pioneer. He was among the Tennessee and Kentucky riflemen that fought the British and Tories at the battle of Kings Mountain. I do not know the name of the fort in which he and his family lived. There was a fort named Martin's Station, which was captured by the Indians; but of course he was not there. His widow, Sarah Scott Martin, used to tell her granddaughters in Illinois about her life in the Kentucky fort -- about molding bullets for the men who were defending the stockade during the Indian attacks. She loathed the white renegade Simon Girty, who may have led the Indians in one of these attacks.

This does not identify the name of the fort because Girty made war on all of them. At one time he led the Indians in an attack on Logan's Fort, and a man named John Martin is mentioned in the history of the fight. It appears that the attack was made while some of the men were outside the stockade. One of them was wounded and Logan called for volunteers to help rescue him. Only Martin volunteered, and


-101-


he stopped at the gate; and Logan ran out alone and carried the wounded man into the enclosure.*

*1943 text: "[I]t is also reported that John Martin accompanied Captain Logan who rescued a man who was wounded outside of the stockade at the beginning of the surprise attack. The story is not highly complimentary of Martin. It is said that Logan called for volunteers to assist in the rescue, and none but Martin responded. He accompanied the captain as far as the gate of the stockade but here his courage failed, and Capt. Logan ran out alone and carried the wounded man into the fort amidst a shower of Indian arrows.

"Father said there was no evidence that this particular John Martin was our ancestor and that there could have been a John Martin in every fort. Uncle Jim thought that he did the prudent and wise thing, and that if a group of men had gone to the rescue, some of them would have been hit, and then there would have been more wounded to be rescued. 'Any way,' he said, 'he did just about as I would have done."'

Sarah Scott Martin and all her six sons with their families (if all were married) left Kentucky about the year 1803 or soon thereafter. Most of them came to the region of Southern Illinois known as Sand Prairie.** Two sons went further west, one of them to Iowa and the other to Missouri. The names of these two sons were Richard and Philip (or

**1943 text: ... near the present city of Olney."


-102-


Stephen).* I think it was Richard who settled in Iowa. There does not appear to have been much correspondence with these two branches of the family, and little is now remembered of them.

*1943 text: "Two of the brothers, Stephen and Richard, went further west one of them to Missouri, and the other to Iowa."

A man named John Martin who came from Iowa and who may have been a member of that branch came to Moultrie County about 1859 or 1860 and bought three or four hundred acres of land near Lovington. He put two tenants on the land and went away. Soon after the Civil War began, he brought a little boy six or seven years of age, whom he left with one of the tenant families and said he was going to Missouri to look after some business affairs. He never was heard of again. After the war -- several years after -- W.A. Cochran, then a young lawyer, looked up the Iowa people who claimed to be his relatives and bought their interest in the land for Charles Howell and James Gregory. These relatives said that John Martin was never married and that he was probably killed in Missouri in the disorderly warfare in that state. No one appeared to know anything about the boy who had been left in Illinois. He was now a grown young man and had lived in the same family he had been left with. Howell and Gregory gave him 80 acres of the land (he made Q.C. [quit claim] deed to the other land).

I think one or two of my uncles have met some of the Missouri Martins, but nothing definite is known of them. Dick Bean was one time in Missouri selling stock food and met an old lady who said her grandfather Martin had several brothers who settled in Illinois.



-103-


The four sons of John and Sarah Scott Martin who settled in Illinois were John Charles, James Scott (who was my great grandfather), Samuel, and William Harvey. I think John must have remained in southern Illinois.* I do not remember hearing anything about him or his family, though I have heard of two or three Martins -- Nelson and I think two Georges -- that I cannot quite place.

*1943 text: "The other one of the six sons -- whose name was John (families then endeavored to name the last son after the father) must have remained in Southern Illinois. I have no information concerning him or his descendants. There has been a history prepared that probably told about him, but I have been unable to find it."

It is certain that three of the sons -- James Scott, William Harvey, and Samuel -- came to what is now Coles County and settled near Kickapoo Point, about six miles west of Charleston, about the year 1820 or soon thereafter.**

**1943 text: "After a short stay [in Southern Illinois] (perhaps a few years), three of the brothers -- James Scott, William Harvey, and Samuel -- came farther north and settled in, or at the edge of, the Kickapoo timber, a few miles west of the present city of Charleston."

II. Samuel Martin

Samuel Martin died in Coles County, leaving his widow and three sons -- I think he had no daughters. His widow married Moses Williams, who earned the reputation of "an ideal stepfather" to the three sons, whose names were John, Samuel, and I think the other was James. Samuel and James (if that was his name) died comparatively young but each left two sons.


-104-


1. In the 1880's I met and got quite well acquainted with one of the sons of Samuel, whose name was Moses Williams Martin (named for his step grandfather). His brother (John, I think) lived in Edgar County, and I never met him. M.W. Martin was the best educated one of the entire family. After graduating from College, he studied in France and Germany. After returning home he taught school several years -- mostly as principal in Chicago suburban schools, and in Cleveland's administration was appointed to a position in the Chicago custom house. -- a position which he kept until he was ready to retire. He was never married. His aunt (Cousin Martha, the mother of Mrs. W.G. Covey) said, "You can't fool me, that boy has been disappointed in love."

2. The two sons of James were James and Charles. The former was a lawyer who retired from practice early, and when I knew him about 1880, he was a prosperous farmer. His brother Charles, also a farmer, lived on Luther Lane's farm near Sullivan for a while. He moved back to Coles County.

3. The other son of Samuel Martin Sr. was John, whom at least a hundred relatives called "Cousin John." He was one of the most popular members of the family and the only one who kept to the original settlement at Kickapoo. He lived to be about 80 years of age and died about 1880, or perhaps a year or two earlier. His wife was Martha Cassidy, and they had one son and four daughters.

The son, A.J. (known as Alex or Aleck), lived on the old Kickapoo home place until his death about 25 years ago. He was married twice but had only one son and two daughters. Both the daughters, I think, died about the time of his death. His son is somewhere in railroad employment. Of the four daughters of John and Martha Martin, Sarah and Bessie died

-105-


single, Mary married Thos. E. Edwards, a preacher, and died leaving one daughter, Mary Edwards, who was -- at last account -- a missionary among the Chinese of San Francisco. The other daughter of "Cousin John", Emma, married Willis G. Covey, a Vermont yankee, well known in Sullivan as a long time editor of the News.

The Coveys had two sons, both printers, one of them in the village of Kansas in Edgar County. The other died recently in Chicago. There were two or three daughters.

The foregoing is about all I know of the family of Samuel Martin, Sr.

III. William Harvey Martin

Next, I will give a sketch of the descendants of William Harvey, which will leave only my own branch of the family (James Scott Martin and his descendants).

William Harvey Martin was the ablest and most distinguished of the sons of John and Sarah Scott Martin. He was a Predestinarian Baptist preacher. After living at Kickapoo Point for a few years, he settled with his family near Lynn Creek, the largest of the four or five streams that flow into the main channel of Whitley Creek.

The creek known as Whitley is formed near the old Whitley settlement at Whitleys Point by two small streams, which were early known as the Forks (the North and the East forks). It is next joined by a stream from the Northeast called Crabapple Creek, which rises in Coles County. Lynn Creek, which runs into it from the south, is formed by two or three branches, the longest of which starts near the town of Gays. Waggoner branch is a stream several miles long

-106-


which flows into Whitley near its mouth and which opens into the Okaw river near the old town of Bruce.

William Harvey Martin had visited the Waggoner settlement there in 1829 or 1830 and was instrumental in organizing the Baptist Church of Lynn Creek, the oldest church organization in what is now Moultrie County.*

1943 text: "Uncle Billy, as he was called, was a famous pioneer preacher of the old school Baptist Church. While he still lived at Kickapoo, he began coming over to Lynn Creek (a branch of Whitley) where the Waggoners had settled to preach the gospel. In 1829 or early in 1830 he officiated [sic] in organizing the first church in what is now Moultrie County. It began with a membership of twenty members."

"Uncle Billy moved his family to a farm near the old church in 1831, and he was the pastor until his death in 1854."

He was married twice. His first wife was Elizabeth (or Susan) [actually Abigail] Whitaker, said to have been his cousin; his family consisted of three sons and two or three daughters. After his death in 1853 or 1854, all his children of the first marriage moved to Texas and settled in the vicinity of Dallas and Fort Worth. It is said large numbers of their descendants still live there. One of his sons was named William Harvey, and that name occurs frequently among his descendants; and all or nearly all of his namesakes are or have been Baptist preachers.**

** 1943 text: "John Martin, the other son whose name I know, died leaving two sons: John, who died in his young manhood, and Henry Whitaker Martin, who after being drafted in the Confederate army, returned to Illinois and lived to be 96 years of age on a farm in North Okaw township, Coles County."


-107-


Henry Whitaker Martin, one of the grandsons of the old pioneer preacher, having bought out the Neely heirs to some land in North Okaw Township, Coles County, came back from Texas after the War to dispose of the property, but decided to keep it, and later moved his family from Texas. Henry Whitaker Martin was a son of John, who had married Susannah, a daughter of James Scott Martin and an aunt of my father. That made Henry W. and my father first cousins. Uncle Henry died only a few years ago at the great age of 96 years.

Henry Whitaker Martin had a son, John James, and a daughter, Cora, who married a man whose name was Martin (though not a relative). She died leaving a son who died, single, in boyhood. John James had two sons and a daughter, who married the surviving husband of her aunt Cora, and after his death she married __________. One of the sons died leaving a large family, who are now grown. I have met two of the boys, who appear to be fine young men. J.J.'s other son, Henry, is in business in Mattoon (now a sales manager for a stock food company and located in Decatur).* John James Martin was a man of much more than average ability. He had a good common school (text book) education and had read and thought much beyond his texts. He taught school, studied law, was admitted to the bar but never practiced. Soon after he was admitted to the bar, the democrats

*The language within the parenthesis is in a different handwriting, and was clearly added after I.J. wrote his text; the added language may have been written by Robert Walter Martin.
-108-


nominated him for County Superintendent of Schools, but he was not elected. He was a successful [man] and at time of his death owned several hundred acres of land. He wrote for the papers a good deal and published some readable poetry, noted for originality of style and thought.

He and my brother prepared a lengthy and comprehensive history of the Martin family, but the manuscript was lost after my brother's death. Doubtless it contained a detailed history of the Texas descendants of William Harvey Martin, a history that can only be hinted at here.

The second group of children of William Harvey Martin (his second wife was Cynthia Clarke), consisted of one son and four daughters. The son, Orange Clarke Martin, was more ambitious than any of his contemporary Martin relatives. He decided to go to college, and some time in the 1840's he registered as a student in Shurtleff college, a Baptist (missionary) institution at Alton. His father had a farm of 240 acres of good land which produced an abundance of food, but little money. Orange and one or two other students rented rooms together and limited their living expense by bringing meat, flour, meal, fruit and molasses from their homes. (He told me this in 1876 when he was here on a visit from his home in Minnesota, where he had located in 1861.) After returning home from college, he taught school for a few years, and after the death of his father, he became a merchant in Sullivan. His wife was a member of the Roney family, and his children have visited their Roney relatives here a number of times.

I think that Orange Clark Martin was the first Moultrie County student in any college. The publishers of a book written by a Whitley Township man in its advertising said that the author of the book was the first in his township to

-109-


seek a higher education (that is, higher than the common district school). Several Whitley people have had a college or an academic education. The talented preacher John Garland Waggoner was a college graduate. Oliver J. Kern was older than the author alluded to. So were Anna Reeder Welch and her brother (I forget his first name). There were several older students of the normal schools, such as Gideon Alexander Edwards and Charley Warden. The Walker girls pursued higher studies at Lee's Academy, as did many others. Frank and Bob Peadro were early students at Illinois University, and I believe Frank completed the course. All of which (if they knew it) ought to teach boasting publishers that derogatory comparisons are odoriferous.

Of the four daughters of William Harvey Martin by his second marriage, one died young and single. Two of them, Ada and Lydia, married John Tolley and John C. Tolley, who were cousins to each other. The first (John and Ada) moved to Missouri and lived near the Kansas border, close to Ft. Scott. I never heard much about their family. The John C. Tolleys lived near Tower Hill and used to visit at our home. There were three or four children, but I do not remember their names. They finally moved to Missouri too.

The other daughter, Jane, married John Elder, and about 1871 they too moved to Missouri and settled close to the two Tolley families.* Both the Elders died within three or four years thereafter. Their oldest children, two daughters, Lydia and Narcissa, both married and both stayed in Missouri. Lydia had married Lemuel Hixon here before moving to Missouri. Their son John Hixon, a printer, came back to Sullivan about 40 years ago (1899), but later went to

**1943 text: "... a great woman -- one of the greatest -- Aunt Jane Elder, wife of a great and good man, John Elder."

-110-


Texas where his widowed mother was then living. Narcissa married a cousin, one of the Tolleys, and after his death she returned to Moultrie County and died only a few years since. One of her daughters lived near Allenville a few years ago -- may be living there yet -- and her children attended the Sullivan High School. Some, I think, went to the University. I do not recall their names.

The eldest son of the Elders, William Shields, came back before his father's death. After the death of John Elder, Henry W. Martin, who was a nephew of Aunt Jane Elder, went to Missouri for the two youngest children, Esias Dalby (known later as E.D. or Deed Elder) and Ada Belle, who made their homes with him until they entered homes of their own. Another of the Elder sons, Rezin Euphrates, came back too and made his home in the family of Peter P. Miller until he and one of the Miller daughters, Sadie, decided to make a home for themselves.

His older brother, W.S. and another of the Miller girls were married about the same time. Her name was __________. She died after a few years, leaving one son, Charles (now deceased) and a daughter, Eva, who married Samuel David Cummins. W.S. Elder was married in succession to two other wives. I could not name all of his children with certainty. Three of his sons were Clarence, Fred, and Felix. Fred married Ethel Harpster, my niece, but that will be recorded elsewhere.

R.E. Elder* had two sons of his first wife, John, who

*1943 text: "[H]is family, instead of calling him by his first name, which had a tolerable sound, corrupted the second name into the word Fratie, or Frate. He was such a fine likeable boy that I always felt sorry for him on account of his funny name."


-111-

married a daughter of Arthur Vaughan, and William S. Jr., who married a daughter of Lawrence Purvis. R.E.'s second marriage was with Rosa Janes. They had two sons and two daughters. One of the sons, George, married a daughter of W.S. Young. Both died comparatively young, leaving three sons. The other son of R.E. Elder, married a young lady named Anderson. He was accidently killed a short time after his marriage while hunting, and his wife, after giving birth to a daughter, became incurably insane. The daughter was reared by her grandmother, who had married Charles Reeves. She graduated from the Sullivan High School, and is now married. One of R.E. Elder's daughters married Thomas Young, and the other married a son of Ora Reeves, the well-known Baptist preacher.

E.D. Elder was a school teacher, a lawyer, and a Baptist preacher.* He was an eloquent speaker, a little too emotional for success at the bar, but effective in the pulpit. People who could remember his grandfather, William Harvey Martin, said that the grandson had much of the old preacher's power and eloquence. I did not mention that his brother, R.E. Elder, was a preacher too, and though he was not so eloquent he was a much better thinker, and his sermons carried greater weight in the estimation of the more intelligent of his hearers.

*1943 text: "The youngest son ... was given the name of Esias Dalby Elder, which was promptly shortened to E.D., which his little sister rendered 'Deed', and that was the principal name he carried through life."

E.D. Elder was for a while a partner of John Eden Jennings, a noted lawyer. One day W.B. Hopper, then


-112-


pastor of the Christian Church, was visiting in the law office. Jennings said to them, "You preachers have a pretty soft snap. Now we lawyers, when we get up to address a jury, know that sitting there listening to every word is the opposing lawyer, as smart as we are and sometimes a damn sight smarter; and if we make the least mistake in our argument, he will pick it up in his answer. Now preachers can get up in the pulpit and say anything you blank blank please and there is not one to answer you, and you can get away with it. Pretty soft I should say."

Elder was a candidate for nomination for County Judge in 1914, but was defeated by John B. Grider. Jennings was candidate in 1922, but he too was defeated by Grider. In turn, he defeated Grider in 1930. Grider had been a candidate six times, was defeated for the nomination twice (once by Purvis) and lost the election once to Oscar Cochran (but defeated Cochran in the next election).

I cannot say much about the family of E.D. Elder as I was only slightly acquainted with most of his children and could not be sure even of their names. (One of his daughters married __________ Ashbrook.)

There remains one other of the children of John and Jane Martin Elder, a daughter, Ada Belle, who married a Janes. Both are dead. One of their sons, Harold Janes, is a Baptist preacher. It would be interesting to know how many of the sons, grandsons, and great grandsons of "Uncle Billie" Martin have followed his foot marks in the pulpit. Harold sometimes preaches at Lynn Creek Church, which his great grandfather organized in 1829.

This brief sketch so far has told something in some respect as much as I know of the descendants of five of the

-113-


six sons of the Kentucky pioneer, John Martin and Sarah Scott Martin.*

*1943 text: "The pioneer mother of the family, Sarah Scott Martin, widow of John Martin, the Kentucky frontiersman, came to Illinois with her six sons. She made her home in Illinois with James Scott Martin and family until her death sometime prior to 1840."

IV. The Daughters of John and Sarah Scott Martin

There ought to be something said of their daughters, whose number may have equalled that of the sons. But little can be said of them because now little -- almost nothing -- is known. One of them, Sarah, married a Baptist preacher, Alexander Guyman, and they moved to Edgar County, Illinois, and lived in or near Paris; and both lived to an advanced age. Another daughter married Charles Neely, and their daughter was married to my grandfather. They also had a son named Charles. Most of the Neely family moved to Texas.

The other daughters of the original Kentucky family of the Martins perhaps married Kentuckians and remained in that state or moved to settlements remote from the homes of their Martin relatives.

V. James Scott and Mary Figley Martin
We come next to a consideration of the most numerous branch of the family, which includes our own ancestors and their closer relatives.

The name of the ancestor of this branch of the family was or is James Scott Martin (named of course for his


-114-


maternal grandfather) and his wife was Mary Figley [Feagle]. Of her family, nothing is now known.

James Scott Martin was born in a Kentucky fort in 1779* in the period of the Revolutionary War, and the more immediate and the more dangerous to the lives of his family -- war with the Indians -- a war which raged almost incessantly along the Kentucky River frontier until final peace was established about 1783 or 1784. He must have married at an early age because it is recorded that one of his sons was born in the year 1800. His wife's name was Mary Figley. Nothing is known of her family except a little about one of her cousins, disclosed by an incident that may be as well related here as anywhere.

*1943 text: "I get the date by calculation. He died in February 1865 and he was said to be 86 years of age."

When James Scott Martin and Mary Figley Martin were starting in a lengthy caravan for the Illinois settlements and after the wife and their children, including a girl baby being about one year old, were seated in the moving wagon, a cousin came to her with her own year old daughter, begging her to take the baby with her and promising to follow herself in the next caravan scheduled to start three or four months later. She explained that her husband had whipped her that morning and that she had left him, and that the separation was final. Without giving grandmother a chance to accept or refuse, she suddenly disappeared, leaving the baby in the wagon. When the head of the family returned just as the caravan was ready to start on its long journey, it is said he was not very well pleased with the surprising increase in his household. But there seemed to be nothing to do but accept the situation.


-115-


This was in the early spring, but the year is uncertain. It was probably 1802 or 1803. I make this guess (it is little more than a guess) for the reason that one of my grandfathers, Joel Figley Martin, was born in Kentucky in 1800, and I think my other grandfather, John Martin, was born in Illinois, and the year of his birth was 1806.* My two grandfathers were brothers. 1803 would give ample time for the arrival and growth of a year old sister of Joel Figley, or 1805 would provide time for still another year-old baby. The removal to Illinoiss could not have been later than 1805 for the reason that my grandfather, Joel Figley, had no recollection of how he came to have (supposedly) twin sisters. That is the way (as twins) the two girls grew up until they were eighteen years of age. They were informed of the truth on the occasion of their marriages, which occurred on the same day.

*1943 text: "John (my other grandfather) was born in 1806, and I have understood that his place of birth was at or near Sand Prairie in Southern Illinois."

The reason the deception had to be maintained was that the mother of the baby died in Kentucky before the second caravan started. It is not known when the girl's father learned where his daughter had been taken. He did not see her until after her marriage, when he visited her at her home in southern Illinois. The visit was not pleasant for either of them. He blamed her foster parents, whom she still regarded as a real father and mother. It is said she tried to make due allowance for his natural feeling of resentment at what he considered a personal wrong and injury, but she could not q uite excuse his denunciations, and they never met again.

-116-


I had heard this story but I never knew the name of the family of the girl's father until I moved to Sullivan, where I became acquainted with an old gentleman who wore a medal given him because it had been ascertained that he was then the earliest living settler in Illinois. He had moved with his family from Kentucky in 1806 before he was quite a year old. The old gentleman was "Uncle John" Rose. He was a sturdy old man and lived to be well past the age of 80. (One of his sons, James Knox Polk Rose, was a high school teacher, in some respects the best I ever knew. He was County Superintendent of Schools from 1873 to 1877. He declined a reelection because the salary of $350 fixed by the Board of Supervisors was too low.) After Uncle John was given the medal by the Illinois Old Settlers Association, I told him that my family came to Illinois a little before 1806, but that none of them who came then were still living. He asked me if I was related to James Scott Martin, and when I replied that he was my great grandfather, he startled me by saying "he kidnapped a baby cousin of mine, a daughter of my uncle." In further talk I learned that he knew the baby's mother had given her to them, but he said the Martins did very wrong in keeping her, which may have been technically true if they had been given any choice in the matter.

The old gentleman and I had been good friends for the two or three years I had known him, and I was friendly with all his family that I knew, especially with one of his sons, whom I regarded as one of my best -- if not the best -- of my teachers. But I think the old man had less regard for me afterwards, though I may have imagined the cool reserve of his manner.

As I have written of two of the daughters, the (so called) twins of James Scott and Mary Figley Martin, leaving

-117-


off at the time of their marriage,* not even giving the names of their husbands or their own names (for the very good reason that I never heard them), I may as well tell the little that I know of his other daughters. I have heard of three of them, and there may have been none other.

*1943 text: "The two reputed twins were married at the home on or near Sand Prairie and remained there when the family moved to Kickapoo."

One -- I think her name was Sarah -- married Daniel Critsinger. (Sarah Critsinger may have been a daughter of Charles Neely. That too would make her an aunt of my father.) They were probably married in southern Illinois, or it may have been in the Kickapoo settlement. They later owned and lived on a farm near Lynn Creek, now in Whitley Township, Moultrie County. The farm is now owned by Roger C. Garrett. Of Aunt Sarah I think it was said that she never talked much and was never positive about anything, but it was said "Uncle Dan" talked enough for both. He was said to be a good man but "too high strung." Some people are yet living who remember hearing of the terrible fist fight he had with Henderson P. Phillips, another "high strung" pioneer, in a dispute over some trifling matter. They moved to Texas before the Civil War, and I have heard nothing more of them or their family.

Another daughter, Euphamia, married Charles Neely (the second) who was her cousin. Of their children I have heard of only one, Martin Neely, who came after the war for a visit from Texas, where all the Neelys appear to have moved and settled with the Texas Martins in the late 1850's. (I remember a George Neely, but do not know if he was a brother or cousin of Martin.) I remember seeing Martin Neely but once. He looked much like father, which was

-118-


easily explained as they were double cousins of the first degree. I remember hearing of another cousin of father whose name was George Neely.

Another daughter (my impression is that her name was Mary) married James Lewis. They must have moved away or died early, as I remember hearing nothing further about them. A son, Martin Lewis, was here from Texas for a visit about the same time as Martin Neely's visit. I remember seeing him but once.

One of their daughters, Emily, made her home with her grandfather and grandmother until she was married about the year 1856 to Archie Lane. (More will appear about the Lanes further along in this sketch.)

Another daughter, Susannah, married her cousin, John, a son of William Harvey Martin. She was the mother of Henry Whitaker Martin, who has been heretofore mentioned.

Another daughter, Isabel, married James, another son of William Harvey Martin, and he, after her death, married her sister Euphamy, another daughter of James Scott and Mary Figley Martin.

VI. The Five Sons of James Scott and Mary Figley Martin

James Scott and Mary Figley Martin had five sons. Their names were Joel Figley, (born in 1800), Samuel, John (born in 1806), Rezin Charles, and James Frost (born in 18 10 or 1811).

A. Samuel Martin, who was apparently the second son, died early. He was married, but I do not remember hearing

-119-


the name of his wife. They had two sons, George and Nelson. (I am not quite sure that George and Nelson were sons of Samuel. They were cousins of Father and it is just possible that one or both could have been his second cousin. Or they may have been sons of James Martin, who married his cousin, a daughter of James Scott Martin.) Both of these died in early manhood. One of them -- George, I think -married my father's eldest sister, and both of these died soon after, leaving a son who died when he was about three years of age.

B. Rezin Charles Martin was a Baptist preacher, and though he died when but slightly past middle age, he had won distinction both as a thinker and a public speaker. George W. Dalby, who was a competent judge in such a case, said that his name, Rezin, was well given and that it should have been spelled "Reason."

I will add here a note on George Wade Dalby, who was the most noted preacher in his church for thirty or forty years after about 1850. About the year 1869, he and several other preachers got into a controversy with an eloquent and forceful preacher, John Shields, who lived near Paris and was pastor of the largest Baptist church known at that time (about 300 members). Dalby's associates in the controversy were several eloquent preachers in Indiana -- Joseph Skeeters, two brothers named Darnell and George W. Paine, and James S. Whitlock. Most of the preachers sided with Dalby and Skeeters, but did not get deeply into the controversy. Skeeters was the leader in the attack. He had said, "why Shields is preaching a typical Methodist heaven, the kind that produces the camp meeting shouting orgies. I am going to hit that the first chance I get." And he did, at an association meeting held at a church in Shelby County. Both he and Shields delivered sermons on Sunday, and Shields, who was first, repeated his description of the

-120-


heavenly life, a spiritual existence which followed immediately after death; he argued that it was only the sinful flesh that died, but the soul, which he said was the real man or woman, went directly to an eternal bliss.

Skeeters in his sermon did not mention Shields or what he had said, but declared his own belief that the Christian faith was grounded on the promise of the resurrection, and if that failed, "all our hopes are vain." He said this was what Paul had in mind when he declared, "If there be no resurrection from the dead, then we of all men are the most miserable." This is briefly and in substance what both men said. I know because while I was not present at this particular meeting, I have heard both of them discuss the matter several times.

It might have passed away as only a difference of opinion, but soon after, it may have been before they left the meeting, Shields, who was very indignant, met Skeeters and a wordy dispute followed in which Shields told him he was a "soul sleeper." At that time, preachers did not often go by train, but would go across country usually holding meetings wherever they stopped at night. Monday evening after the association meeting closed, Shields had an appointment at the Lynn Creek Church. Skeeters, Dalby, W.H. Darnell, and G.W. Paine came along, but took seats in the audience, and Shields had the pulpit all to himself. I heard that sermon, and in some way I had heard of the controversy on the day before. The Church was crowded, many people expecting a renewal of the controversy, but Shields did not mention the disputed doctrine.

Four years later the disputed doctrine was discussed again at a meeting of the association held at Lynn Creek. In this meeting, W.H. Darnell followed Shields and made a very strong presentation of their position. Dalby, who was

-121-


moderator (Chairman) of the meeting and who sat at the front of the platform by the side of the speaker, fervently shook the hands of Darnell at the conclusion.

The next morning I saw Shields and Darnell meet near the speakers stand and saw men hurrying toward them, evidently expecting something like what occurred four years before. But the conversation, though serious and dignified, was quite friendly. Skeeters had preceded Shields (they always had three sermons at these Sundays and all of them too long). I heard Skeeters talking to a group of men and saying: "He did not make an attack. He gave his own views and said nothing he did not have a right to say."

But the feud gathered strength largely on account of Shields' aggressiveness. I remember hearing him say, "I would not talk to any of those men (meaning perhaps Dalby, Skeeters, the Darnells and Paine) without witnesses, because," he said, "I know they will lie." He was an older man than the others, and was nearly blind. (Skeeters became blind too in his old age.) The lay leaders of the Shields party were all old men with their families and others under their influence.

The controversy did not much disturb the churches in Indiana, where Skeeters and the Darnells and their friends had full sway. But in the Illinois associations, it was different. Wherever Shields had personal influence, there was trouble except in his own association, where he appeared to have a united following.

Lynn Creek and one other church in the Okaw association were divided. The division was made in Bethal Church by a ruse. The Shields following lived at or near the little settlement of Paradise, and the members living there asked for letters of dismissal to form another church.

-122-


Afterwards they took their new church into the Shields association (called Little Wabash).

At Lynn Creek Uncle Gilbert [Waggoner], a man whom everyone loved and respected, presented to the Church asking for letters, but when asked for the reason for the request, he just got up and left, and the others joining in the request went with him. They built what is known as the Waggoner church, but it was given a bible name. It too joined the Little Wabash Association. I think this church and also the old Lynn Creek congregation have suffered the same blight that has denuded most of the country churches (and some in town too).

The preachers of the Skeeters and Dalby school, while they did not hesitate to declare their position on the disputed question, seldom elaborated or explained it. They did not like the taunt of "soul-sleeper."

Some of the small preachers of the Shields faction went to a spiritualistic extreme. Dalby in private and friendly conversation went much further than he ever did in the pulpit.

My father never joined in argument over the disputed doctrine, but I think he favored the Skeeters and Dalby position. Anyway, he remained in that church party.

Dalby once said in private talk "When a man sleeps he is unconscious of his surroundings. He may sleep so soundly that he does not dream or is at least unable to remember a dream. Now if a man were in a deep, dreamless sleep and if something should occur to end his life, do you think this man, who at the moment apparently knows nothing, will at the next moment, in death, know everything? It is nonsense

-123-


I tell you; when a man is dead, he is dead." But he had faith in the Resurrection!

Dalby was at first a preacher in the "Separate" Baptist church, and it is said that he went to hear R.C. Martin preach to get his points on "Predestination," which is the principal difference between the two Baptist churches. He did this for the purpose of answering them as he was also an eager and talented controversialist. He was impressed in a way different from what he expected. He put off his answer and returned for another hearing and finally acknowledged conversion to the older doctrine, and was for many years a leading preacher among Baptists of the old school (the people of other churches call them "Hardshells").

John R. Eden, who knew Dalby well, said of him that he had the "keenest" mind he ever encountered. He had once been Dalby's attorney, and was surprised at his ability to understand a point of law on the instant it was presented. He said if Dalby had been a little better educated and had studied and practiced as a lawyer, he would have been brilliantly successful.

In 1855, only a few weeks before his death, Rezin C. Martin had a debate in the Christian Church at Sullivan with Col. John W. R. Morgan on the question of adopting what was called the "Maine Liquor Law," which was submitted to a popular vote in Illinois. It was really a question of statutory prohibition. Even Maine did not adopt constitutional prohibition until thirty years later.

As prohibition was not then a party question, the politicians hesitated to take sides, and the debate was carried on mostly by the preachers. The Methodist ministers generally espoused the cause of prohibition, while the Baptists as generally took the side of "personal liberty." The

-124-


historical reason for such alignment readily appears. The Baptists resented governmental interference with personal affairs, when actual crime was not involved. The early Baptists had been persecuted through many generations by the English government. Even in this country, they had seen their first great preacher, Roger Williams, banished from the New England settlements and forced to find a temporary home among friendly Indians. In Virginia, they were prosecuted on the charge of "preaching the gospel without a license." If they had asked for a license, it would have been refused. The student of history knows how Patrick Henry won his first distinction as a lawyer in the famous "preachers case." The new church of the Disciples (Christian) was started mostly by people who were Baptists or by those who inherited the Baptist tradition as to personal liberty. Some of the Disciples were former Presbyterians, and that church had been "persecuted" or persecutors, depending upon whether they were in a majority or minority. On the other hand, the Methodists had been derived from the Episcopals, who had (except for a short interval under Cromwell) been the dominant church in England. It was the Episcopal Church that had jailed the Baptist preachers in Virginia, and it had been tolerated in all the colonies. So it is easy to understand the different attitude toward governmental interference even though freedom of worship was no longer questioned.

Col. John W.R. Morgan, who had been the advocate of the prohibition (or Maine) law, became its champion in three debates or public discussions in the County. One debate was in Sullivan, and the other two were at Marrowbone (now Bethany) and Lovington. Judge W.G. Cochran heard the discussion at Lovington. He was but eleven years old, but said he remembered the meeting quite well. He said the opposition to the law was represented by a minister of the Christian Church. He did not remember

-125-


his name. He felt sure that it was not Hostetler or Henry Kellar, but said it might have been one of Kellar's brothers. They were all preachers, and it was said that all of them as well as Bushrod Henry were opposed to the Maine law. I have this fact from John R. Eden, who was intimately friendly with the Henry and Kellar families. But Mr. Henry had by that time moved to Shelbyville. (I use the personal names of these preachers for the reason that the old school Baptists, and until quite recently the members of the Church of the Disciples, never used the title "Reverend" in speaking of their ministers.)

The first arrangement for the debate in Sullivan was for Dr. William A. Kellar, then the pastor of the Christian Church, to oppose Col. Morgan, but in a cholera epidemic he was stricken and died of the plague. It is remarkable that shortly after the debate, Rezin Martin too died, of malarial fever.

The meeting at Sullivan was attended by a large crowd, which entirely filled the auditorium of the Church, and many outside heard the speeches through the open windows. The meeting was presided over by John R. Eden, then a young lawyer of two years standing at the bar. When some people at the conclusion of the debate called upon him for a decision, he replied that the voters of the state would render a verdict at the election -- which they did, in rejecting the law by a big majority. The people of the state were never again called upon to vote on the question of prohibition for nearly 80 years, when the question of repeal of National prohibition was submitted, and then they again voted overwhelmingly against the prohibition idea.

Rezin C. Martin was married about 1830. His wife was a daughter of William Clemmens, who lived near Urbana. I never heard her called by any name except "Aunt Polly,"

-126-


but whether her name was Pollyanna or whether it was a nickname, I do not know. About the time of his marriage or soon thereafter, Uncle Rezin moved from Coles County and settled on a farm part of which is now owned by Edward C. Peadro, near the old site of Lynn Creek Church. (Mr. Peadro also owns a small portion of the W.H. Martin farm.)

After living there nearly a quarter of a century, he died in August 1855, shortly after his debate with Col. Morgan. Rezin was a successful physician of the hydropathic school (if there was such a school). He was fairly successful in healing others, but when he was attacked or afflicted with a malignant fever, there was no one to administer the treatment to him. It is probable that he had no physician in attendance. He did not favor drug treatment, and he was the only hydropath in the neighborhood. He was survived by his widow and a large number of children. After a few years, Aunt Polly was married to William Hixon, a widower and an old friend who lived near her father's home in Champaign County. He was said to be as good a man as Moses Williams (already mentioned), but he did not have the same opportunity to prove his worth as stepfather, as his wife's children were mostly grown or nearly so. Only one -- the youngest daughter, whose name was Sarah -- made her home with them for any great length of time.

Rezin had one son, Lemuel, by his first marriage. Lemuel has been mentioned as the husband of Lydia Elder and the father of John Hixon, who was a painter in Sullivan for several years.

There were three other daughters of Rezin C. Martin, all of whom were grown young women at the time of their father's death. The eldest, Ruth (usually called Ruthie), married James M. Smith, who was a grandson of John Waggoner, the eldest of half dozen sons of Isaac Waggoner,

-127-


the pioneer from North Carolina. James and Ruthie Smith had one daughter, Avena, who married Logan Holmer. They moved to Tennessee and died there, leaving a son and daughter, who inherited the Smith estate upon the death of their grandmother only a few years ago. The daughter, who still lives in Tennessee, remains the owner of the old Whitley homestead.

The second daughter of Rezin C. Martin, whose name was Phoebae, married Isaiah Waggoner, a son of George Waggoner, one of the pioneer Waggoner brothers. They had two or three children when they moved west about 1870. The eldest son was named Malden. Their history can be found in the printed history of the Waggoner family. Uncle "j" became a Baptist preacher after going west, and he was said to be "a good one" by those who heard him when he visited here about 25 years since.

Another daughter, Mary Jane, married George Monson, and they too went west. I remember two or three of their children, but I have never heard about their subsequent history.

Not much can be written about the sons of Rezin C. Martin. The eldest was John Wesley (a strange name for the son of a Baptist minister). He went west before I can remember him. He may have been in the army (on either side). His word was not considered quite reliable, and it is said he told conflicting stories about his life. The only time I ever saw him was about 1870, when he came to our home with a little daughter about six or eight years of age, a beautiful little girl. I do not think he had then visited any of his nearer relatives. I heard Mother tell him (he was her double cousin) to be sure and visit his mother (which I am sure he intended to do). I doubt if he saw his sister, Mrs. Smith. He left the little girl with his mother, Aunt Polly

-128-


Hixon. I saw her a few years later -- a beautiful young woman. I never heard what further became of Wesley. He was a queer character.

Darius Litford was the second son and a likeable man. He had some ability as a salesman, and spent some time in what was called canvassing (or peddling). He and his stepbrother, Lemuel Hixon, became what was then called free thinkers (as if there could be any real thinking that is not free!) or skeptics. He finally, like all his brothers, drifted away somewhere, and after the middle seventies I heard nothing of them until a few years ago a granddaughter of Litford was living with Eliza (Hostetler) Waggoner in Sullivan. She was a Roman Catholic and she said her grandfather had joined that church. It seemed strange, at first thought, but a little reflection discloses the reason. First, a Protestant believer -- then a doubter or skeptic, perhaps an atheist -- then he begins to doubt his doubts and wonders if his so-called reason has not been playing him tricks. If he turns to religion again, he is apt to seek authority rather than a creed that needs interpretation by his own mind or reason. This may lead him straight into the Catholic Church -- a refuge for the tired thinker or for the timid who are afraid to follow the guidance of their own minds.

The other sons of Rezin C. Martin, whose names were William, Joel and Worley, after working as farm hands for a few years, all went away, and I lost trace of them. I think the youngest daughter, Sarah, married in Champaign County, and I suppose the daughter of Wesley did the same.

I remember that Worley had many friends and was almost as popular as his elder brother, Litford. Bill and Joe did not attract so many friends, although I think no one

-129-


really disliked them. None of them, not even Litford or Worley, appeared to pay much attention to girls.

C. The youngest son of James Scott Martin was James Frost.* He was twice married. James Frost was 50 or 51 years of age at the beginning of the Civil War. Notwithstanding his age, he enlisted and was a good soldier throughout the War.

* 1943 text: "James Figley Martin." "He lived to be 93 years of age."

There was one son by his first marriage, Miles, who married a sister of my father, "Aunt Rhoda." They had two or three children when they moved to Nebraska about 1868. I think their family was not considered large for that day -- four or five children at most.

By his second marriage, Uncle Jim was the father of two sons and a daughter, Emily, who married Peter Tritmaker. The two (Tritmaker) daughters are married and are living in the State of Washington.

Of the two sons of James Frost Martin by his second marriage, Charles married Louisa, the eldest daughter of Archie and Emily (Lewis) Lane. Charley and Mrs. Lane, Louisa's mother, were first cousins, so that he and Louisa were cousins of the first degree once removed, as the English awkwardly describe such a relation. They both died in St. Louis a few years ago. Some of their children have visited here (with their Lane relatives) and they seemed to be serious and rather important people.

The other son, Sylvester Martin, went to Missouri sixty or more years ago. I do not know much about his family.


-130-


D. This is a good place to say something of Archibald Lane, whose name has already been mentioned. He was related only by adoption and marriage.

About 1841, after the marriage of all their children and after the death of Sarah Scott Martin, who had made her home with them since coming to Illinois, my great grandfather and great grandmother, James Scott and Mary Figley Martin, made the trip back to the old home in Kentucky. They spent the nights at public inns along the road. At one inn there was a lively six-year-old boy that attracted their attention, and especially when they found that he was an orphan and not closely related to the innkeeper. After leaving the inn to continue the journey, great grandmother declared that if the boy was still there on the return trip, she would offer to take him home with them. On returning, she found the innkeeper's wife quite willing to give him up, as she said the inn could not provide a good home for a child.

Archibald was taken into the family, though not legally adopted, and his name was never changed. He had playmates with the grandsons of his foster parents, and to all intents and purposes he became one of the family. He took care of his protectors in their old age, and when the old gentleman died at the age of 86 years, he gave his home farm to Archie Lane, who as has been said, had married their granddaughter, Emily Lewis, who had also for several years made her home with them.

The Lanes had two daughters and three sons. The eldest daughter, Louisa, as has just been said, married Charles Martin.

-131-


James Lewis Lane married my cousin Mary, daughter of Uncle William Thomas Martin. Their history will be given further on.

A second son, Charles Martin Lane, married a daughter of Daniel M. Patterson. He became a lawyer, and before his death lived in St. Louis. They had two daughters and one son, Hoke Lane, who lives here, having married a daughter of Rufus Harshman.

The third son, Jeff Lane, married Martha Miller. They had two or three children who became printers. Their son, Ray, is now running a newspaper at Bement.

E. All the children of James Scott Martin have been accounted for (some of them quite briefly) except my two grandfathers.

The eldest son, I think the eldest child, was my mother's father, Joel Figley Martin, who was born in 1800. When about ten years of age, he was afflicted with what was then called the "white swelling," which left him with a bent and stiffened knee. He had to use crutches the remainder of his life. He recovered in every other way, and was physically strong and healthy until his last illness, when he died of pneumoma at the age of 66 years.

Joel Figley became better educated than most boys of his day, but there was little chance for more than the rudiments of an education, aside from reading the few (very few) books obtainable. He went to school, when there was a school, at first riding in a dog cart, and later he had a pony. Usually the school was several miles from home.

He taught school himself for several years, and also served as Justice of the Peace and school treasurer. He thus

-132-


managed to make a living for a large family until his children were able to care for themselves.*

*1943 text: "[H]e was an intelligent reader, and though a poor man, even then he had a good history. My father bought some of his books, craving most for the Bible commentaries and other religious books he bought. There were some m the collection that I devoured, such as a good -- though too short -- history of Greece, the Sayings of Poor Richard, and a collection or selections from the writings of Seneca under a general title of Moral Philosophy and A Guide to Virtue -- a forbidding title but a good book."

Joel Figley was also a Baptist preacher (the kind of Baptist that had no payroll for preachers). I remember hearing him preach, but cannot remember anything I heard him say. He was not as eloquent as his younger brother, Rezin C. Martin, but like him, he tried to teach by explanation (exposition) and argument, but being less eloquent, his sermons suffered by comparison. Dalby, a younger preacher, once said, "I could learn more from him than from anyone else, except his brother Rezin."

Joel Figley Martin married Elizabeth Clemmens, with whom he became acquainted when visiting her home near Urbana on a preaching tour.** The Baptists in early days went many miles to their meetings. In fact, the Western half of Indiana and Eastern Illinois appeared to be one Baptist neighborhood.

**1943 text: "Her sister Polly, as has been stated, became the wife of Rezin C. Martin."

Joel F. Martin and his family lived for many years in the Lynn Creek neighborhood, but later their home was in North


-133-


Okaw Township, Coles County. They had a large family, five sons and seven daughters.

The oldest son, James Scott Martin Jr., died in early manhood. He left a widow and two children. She took the children and went to her own people, and I think little was heard from them afterward.

The second son, Samuel, was about 26 or 27 years of age when he went to Texas with the other Martins, three or four years before the War of Secession. He married in Texas, but I think he had no children. A year or two after the War, he came back with W.H. Martin and visited for a few weeks. Both he and Uncle Henry (who was not an uncle but a cousin) had been drafted into the Confederate Army, and served through the War. They were very bitter against secession, and both were Republicans. Uncle Henry, after moving here, became a Democrat, but Uncle Sam stayed a Republican, although perhaps he did not take the trouble to vote in Texas.

The third son was Uncle Rezin (who wrote his name "Reese"). He had a leg crushed in a runaway accident when a little boy, and it had to be amputated. He was the problem child of the family. His father, who was a cripple too, tried to educate him, but he would not study. He learned to read a little, but that was about all. However, he was cheerful and fun loving, and a boon companion for boys until they grew up, got too big, when he held aloof from them. He was never married.

Uncle Levi was the next son. He served in the Union army throughout the war (the last thirteen months a prisoner at Tyler, Texas).

-134-


Uncle Jeff (Thomas Jefferson)* went to war later as a recruit and got into action just in time to be taken prisoner along with Uncle Levi and several other Coles County boys. But Uncle Jeff managed to escape before they reached the prison camp. His account of his escape to the Union lines made a thrilling adventure story. He had to travel at night and hide by day, and depend upon such food as he could persuade negroes to bring him.

*1943 text: "The youngest of the brothers, Thomas Jefferson Martin, ...."

For a while, Uncle Sam was a guard at the prison camp, and did what he could to help Uncle Levi and his two or three friends, who had decided to stay the War out in prison rather than attempt an escape.

After the War, Uncle Levi married and went west. I remember they had a daughter two or three years old, pretty but as fat as a fat pig. I think he and his wife separated soon afterward, and he finally went to Texas and lived with or near Uncle Sam. His pension would keep him comfortable.

Uncle Jeff went away about the same time, and I think he seldom stayed long in one place. He wrote me once after he had been away thirty years or more. He had been in Canada for a few years and was then with a lumber company in the State of Washington. He wrote a number of inquiries about people, and signed "Tom Martin." I replied but heard nothing more from him.


-135-


Later he wrote one of his sisters from the soldiers' home in Nashville. He was then 80 years of age, and thought his roving life was over.

The eldest daughter was Rachel Elvina, my mother, born April 1, 1832. She was married in 1853 to her cousin, John Neely Martin. Their history will appear further on in this sketch.

In pioneer days every large family, if they had any enterprise or ambition, had to make itself a sort of industrial corporation. Each family was a manufacturing establishment. In the home, there was the cooking, weaving, sewing and knitting, and laundry to supply the needs of a dozen or more people. Each large farm had its smith and carpenter shop. And the boys and girls would specialize in the different work or trades.

My mother was the weaver of her family. She got to be an expert weaver, and after being provided with a good loom, she took in weaving for other families.

The next daughter was Lucy, who married a man named Robinson (I have forgotten his first name). They moved away in the 1850's and I do not think she ever came back for a visit. One of her sons was here, but that was fifty years ago.

The next daughter, Louisa Anne, married George Martin, a cousin. He died early, leaving two children, George and a daughter whose name I have forgotten. Aunt Louisa Anne married again, her second husband being William Holmer, who was another good stepfather -- kind and understanding. They moved away, and I do not know their subsequent history.

-136-


Aunt Pollyann was the next daughter in this large family. She made a rather "uncouth" marriage. Her husband was William Yarborough (later spelled Yarber), who was a Sullivan teamster who made a living hauling produce to Mattoon and returning with merchandise for Sullivan merchants before the railroads were built. The North Okaw road to Mattoon ran by Grandfather's house, and that accounts for their acquaintance. They both died about the same time, leaving two children, William and _________, both of whom are now deceased without leaving children.

T'he next daughter was Rebecca, who married Abram Stevens, a war veteran, several years her senior. Two sons, John and William, went west, and the last I heard of William, he was a business man and politician in Kansas City. Another son, Oscar, lived at Mattoon, as do two or three married daughters. One of the Stevens daughters, Mrs. Cora Stamper and her husband, own a farm in Whitley Township, a portion of which was owned by her great grandfather, James Scott Martin, more than 100 years ago.

Another daughter, Ruth, married Bob Robinson, an Englishman who also was a soldier in the Union army. Their daughter Marge married a man named Robinson, but not a relative. A daughter of theirs, being a granddaughter of Aunt Ruth, was married to a nephew of mine, Lawrence Martin Harpster.

Aunt Ruth's oldest son was named James. He went to school to me in 1876-77, when he was five years old. The younger members of the family I never knew.

-137-


Aunt Lurana* was the youngest of my mother's sisters. She lived with us and went to school when she was fourteen to sixteen years of age. She married Wade Fulton. There were two sons, Harry and Walter, and two daughters, Mary and Fannie.

*1943 text: "Margaret Lurana."

F. All the sons and daughters of James Scott Martin and their descendants so far as I know have been mentioned. except my father's father, whose name was John and who was the third or fourth son in the family. He was named for his Grandfather Martin. The eldest son, Joel Figley, had been named for the other grandfather.

John was called "Squire John," but why I do not know. My father did not remember his ever holding the office of Justice of the Peace. The title may have been only complimentary.

John married, about 1828, Ann Neely, his cousin**. I think her mother was a sister of James Scott Martin. After their marriage they lived for ten years at Kickapoo Point in Coles County.*** They then moved to the Whitley Creek

**1943 text: "He was born in 1806, married in 1827 to Ann Neely (said to be his cousin)."

*** 1943 text: "He had a small farm in the north edge of the Kickapoo timber on the road from Charleston toward the present city of Mattoon. They lived here for ten or twelve years, and here most of their children were born: Isabella in 1829, James Lewis in 1831, John Neely (my father) in 1833, and William Thomas in 1835. In 1838, John Martin sold his Kickapoo farm to Capt. B.F. Jones, who for about 60 years was one of the leading citizens of that community."


-138-


settlement* and began, in 1838, the improvement of a farm, part of which is now owned by Rex Garrett. He built a two story residence, which stood about 150 yards south of the present location of the Garrett home. The farm was two miles long, north and south, and from a quarter to a half mile wide. His father, James Scott Martin, had moved to the neighborhood five years earlier. The latter had been one of the County Commissioners elected when Coles County was organized in 1830. He had been reelected and was still a Commissioner when he moved away, in 1833.

*1943 text: "... where his father, his brother Rezin and his uncle William Harvey Martin had settled some years earlier. He bought land in what was later known as the Whitfield neighborhood, and built a large two-story house on land now owned by Rex Garrett. He kept adding to his purchase until he had several hundred acres reaching from Whitley Creek to what is now known as the Western Avenue public road."

1. The eldest, Isabella (Ibbie), was born in 1829 and died about 1853. She had married a cousin, George Martin, who died about the same time. A son also died after a few years.

2. The eldest son, James Lewis Martin, was born in 1831. He married Emsey, a daughter of Gilbert Waggoner. She was my favorite aunt, the only relative by marriage, and she was my mother's favorite too. They had three sons and four daughters. Mary Ann, the eldest, married Henry Humphries, but lived but a short time after her marriage.



-139-


Catherine, the second daughter of James Lewis Martin, married a man named Thomason, but she too died within a short time. (After Catherine's death, Thomason married a daughter of Lafayette Bond. After Thomason s death, his widow and two or three daughters lived in Sullivan.)

There were two other daughters, but I do not remember which is the elder. Lucretia married first, Earl Howard. They had two sons, 1 believe, before he died. Her second marriage was to a man named Henderson, and they have several children.

The other daughter of James Lewis Martin, Narcissa, married Frank Bundy. He was a successful farmer, and it is said that he and his brother Edgar made some money in grain on the Board of Trade. He died while yet a young man, leaving his widow and three daughters well provided for. For quite a while they have lived in Chicago, but still own a good farm near Mattoon.

Uncle Jim's eldest son, John Henry (nicknamed "Doug"), died when he was about 19 years of age. The second son, James Bayley, lives in Washington State. I do not know much about his family. I was never much acquainted with the youngest son, George, and I do not know if he is still living.

Uncle Jimmy Lewis (everyone called him that) was a farmer, but more of a trader. About the time of the Civil War, he had started well in business, and appeared to be prospering, when a trading partner absconded with most of the partnership property, leaving the partnership debts unpaid. Those debts worried my Uncle for many years. At times he lived in Arkansas and Missouri. His last years were spent in Missouri, but after suffering an accidental injury, he

-140-


was brought here and died at the age of 89 at the home of his daughter, Sarah Powell.

Mrs. Powell (who has been left out of the foregoing sketch) was his second daughter. She married Nelson Powell, who was what is called a good manager, though never a hard worker.

I will add here a note about Nelson Powell,, who was a remarkable man. He was. illiterate -- could not write and could scarcely read -- in fact never tried to read.

But he could think! He knew nothing of the rules of arithmetic -- could not write figures or even read them -- but he could make astonishing mental calculations. If given the measurement of a grain bin or crib, he would be able to compute the capacity approximately. He never explained his mental premises.

He was a predestinarian in religion and a Republican in politics. He read nothing but he listened to arguments, speeches, and conversations, and became fairly well informed. He was unyielding and uncompromising. For instance, he could see nothing wrong in the so-called corruption of the Grant Administration.

In 1880 when the State of Indiana went Republican by a small majority and it appeared from the exposure of the "Dorsey Circular" that the Republicans had employed a system of vote buying, Uncle Nelsen said he could see nothing wrong in that. "If," he said, "the Democrats have votes to sell and the Republicans have money to buy, and if they can agree on the price and the terms, I see nothing wrong in it. Both the buyer and seller are acting for the good of the country."

-141-


He could dispose of any other political controversy just as effectively and just as satisfactorily to himself

He never wasted any money. Even his friends thought him too close, even stingy. I remember when he was poor his mother owned a few acres of rich bottom land and a two room log cabin. Nelse cultivated the rich land in vegetables, sorghum, etc., some poultry and pigs, and in that way they made a sort of living. He began buying a few calves and let them grow up on the range. They were a hungry herd through the winter. After the death of his mother, Nelse sold the little river home and purchased 35 acres of prairie land and took in a bachelor partner, Sylvester Martin, who had a team and plow. He began to prosper and soon bought the adjoining 45 acres, making his first 80. About this time, he married Sally Martin. Within a few years he had several hundred acres, and then quit buying land and loaned his money and reloaned the interest. When he died, his personal loans had reached $15 or 20 thousand, and he had bought two good homes in Sullivan.

Nelson applied his homely philosophy to every problem. Once a dependent man who was rather difficult to please left his home with a relative and took up his lodging in the county farm (or poor house). After waiting a while, he spoke to Uncle Nelse of what he called the disgrace to his family in allowing one of its members to live in the "poor house." "No disgrace at all," he replied. "Yours is a large family and it has been paying taxes for many years to support the poor, and no member has ever been benefitted until now. It is all right for you to have a home at the farm." The logic struck the poor man with such force that he left the county farm to live with one of his sisters.

-142-


Nelson Powell died several years ago, leaving his widow and one daughter, who is married to Ira Carson. Mrs. Powell died a few weeks ago (1941).

After the death of Aunt Emsey, Uncle Jim married again. I never met his second wife, as they did not live here much of the time. People who knew said she was a good woman and a good wife -- a good fortune. It would have been a great affliction after living so many years with a perfect woman like Aunt Emsey to be mated with her opposite.

3. The second son in the John Martin family was John Neely, born in January 1833. His history will be given toward the end of this sketch.

4. The third son (fourth child) was William Thomas Martin, born in 1835. He was known generally as "Will Tom." Father usually spoke of him as "Will," sometimes as "William Thomas." The "Will Tom" was a neighborly call, not a family one. He married Jane, daughter of William Waggoner, who was a son of John ("Uncle Jackie"), the eldest of the well-known pioneer Waggoner brothers.

With the exception of a year in Mattoon and a year or two in Arkansas, they lived on a farm in East Nelson Township. After Aunt Jane died, sometime in the 1890's, Uncle Will married again, but he was not so fortunate as Uncle Jim. It is unnecessary to write of his second wife. Aunt Jane had been beyond criticism. She had been less talkative and less cheerful, and on that account seemed less friendly than did Aunt Emsey, but I am sure it only seemed so, for she never failed in any of her duties of friendship or in loyalty to her family.

-143-


Their eldest daughter, Nancy Anne, married Martin T. Waggoner, the youngest son of Uncle Gilbert and Aunt Patsey. They had two daughters, Jerusha, who died some ten years ago, and Belle, who married a man named Allison. They lived in Sullivan and have one daughter. Nancy Martin Waggoner died a short time prior to the death of Sarah Powell. They at that time were the two oldest living grandchildren of John Martin. (I have that distinction now.)

The eldest son of William Thomas Martin was Francis Marion, who died about three years ago, in 1938. He married Marcia, the daughter of Thomas Graven. They were the parents of five sons and three daughters. The first son, John, died in young manhood. Two sons, Edwin and Fred, are married and live in Mississippi. Each has two or three children. Roy is married and lives in the old family home southeast of Sullivan. They have no children. Another son, Carl, served overseas in the World War and was severely wounded. He is married, lives in Sullivan, and has children. One of the daughters, Nellie, married Otis Williamson and lived for many years in the Northwest before her death a few years ago. They were the parents of a large family of children.

Another daughter, Ettie, married a man named Sutton and has lived near Springfield for many years. They have no sons and three daughters.

The youngest daughter of F.M. and Marcia Martin, Carrie Eathel, married my son, John Eden Martin. Their history and that of their children will be given further on in this sketch. (Their history is also given in the printed history of the Waggoner family.)

The second son of William Thomas Martin was John Dawson, named for a Baptist preacher. He was married

-144-


twice and had one son and three daughters of his first marriage. He died several years ago, and none of his children live here.

The youngest son, William Isaac Martin, married Ida T'hompson. They five near Sullivan and have reared an interesting family. They have four sons and three daughters. The sons and one daughter are school teachers. One daughter, Sarah, is married to a man named Christ, and lives on a farm east of Sullivan. Mabel, the school teacher, and Laverna, are at home. Ernest, the oldest son, married a Myers, and they have one daughter, who is also married. Ernest is principal of a school at Bethany.

One of the daughters of William T. Martin, Sarah, married Albert Baugher. They had two sons. Ollie is married and lives near Windsor. They have several children. One of their daughters married Mark Buckalew. The other of the two sons of the Baughers, Ed, married, but he left his wife and their children twenty or more years ago and his whereabouts are not known. His wife was afterward married to Len White, who reared the Baugher children.

The next daughter of W.T. Martin, Mary, married James Lewis Lane, as has been related. They reared a large family, three daughters and seven sons. The eldest daughter, Maude, was a school teacher. Her first marriage was to James Weaver, and they moved to the northwest. Her second marriage was to ___________.

The eldest son of the Lanes is Claude. He first married a daughter of Charles and Candace Hunter. They had four children. After the death of his wife, he remarried. They live not far from Bruce.

-145-


The second son was Charles Albert Lane, who is now (1941) County Treasurer. He married Vica, a daughter of my school boy friend, Frank Leeds. They have four children, who have taken advantage of their school opportunities in high school and college. Their names are: Charles, Orris, Louise, and Wilma.

Walter Lane was for a while in business in Sullivan, but is now located in Springfield. He married a daughter of Andy Waggoner, who was a son of AJ. (Jack), one of the sons of Uncle Gilbert. They have two or three children.

Roscoe is another son of J.L. and Mary Lane. He is married, is employed in Mattoon, but lives near the old Waggoner Church in Whitley Township.

The fourth daughter of W.T. Martin, Violet (named for the heroine of Mrs. Gilbert Judson Beebe's story of that name), was married to Allen Hostetter, son of William Hostetter, whose wife was Nancy, one of the daughters of Gilbert Waggoner. This branch of the Hostetter family moved to Missouri fifty years ago. In the settlement of Uncle Will's estate, the names of several Hostetter heirs appeared, but I do not remember the names.

The next daughter, Elizabeth, married Will Sutton. They are living at the old homestead, a part of which they own.

The youngest daughter, Dora, married Will Thompson. They live near Moweaqua.

5. The fourth son of John and Ann Neely Martin was Daniel Parker Martin. He was the last child of the family, and was born in 1845.

-146-


He was named for the most noted Baptist preacher of his day, who was the formulator of a theological theory known as the "Two Seed Doctrine," which is seldom or never mentioned now. The Parkers, Daniel and two or three brothers, including Senator Nat (or Nathaniel), with their families went to Texas in the middle fifties at the time so many Martins went. Some of them settled on the frontier and became involved in Indian warfare. A daughter of one of the Parkers was taken prisoner by the Indians, became a wife of one of the chiefs and the mother of a famous chief who later was distinguished in border warfare with the whites.

Bonnie Parker, the noted woman bandit who was killed a few years ago in a gun battle with detectives, was a daughter of some of this Illinois-Texas family, possibly a descendant of the noted two-seed preacher.

Daniel Parker Martin enlisted in the Union army when he was about 18 years of age -- possibly a little before his 18th birthday. He was making his home with us, as Father had been his guardian since the death of their father. He stayed in the army about 16 months before coming home on a furlough about Christmas time in 1864. Uncle Parker was the sixth uncle of mine named Martin in the war, counting one grand uncle Jim. Another, Uncle Sam, was in the Confederate army. Two other uncles, Stephens and Robinson -- both soldiers in the war -- later married two of my aunts. This makes eight soldier uncles -- not a bad record.

Uncle Parker about 1867 married Amanda Fortner, and when they went west they had two sons -- the eldest John Neely, and the other William. Uncle Parker became a missionary Baptist preacher. He and Aunt Manda were divorced and she became a sort of independent preacher and

-147-


evangelist -- a little on the sensational order. He married again, and there were several children in his two families.

6. Aunt Rhoda, the second daughter of John and Ann Neely Martin, was born in 1837. She married a cousin, Miles Martin who has been mentioned as the son of James Figley [Frost?] Martin. They had two children, a son James and a daughter Millie, when they moved to Nebraska about 1869. I think the family numbered five or more children al together.

7. Aunt Serfida Jane was born in 1839. She lived to a greater age than any of her brothers or sisters, dying at the age of 91 years.

8. Aunt Mary, born in 1842, was married twice. Her first husband was James Bathe, and they had one son, John Martin Bathe. Her second husband was William Robinson. They had three or four children, all small, when they moved to Arkansas. (I had three Robinson uncles by marriage, and none of them was related to either of the others. Besides my cousin, Maye Robinson married a Robinson, who was unrelated to any of them. It makes one wonder how all the unrelated Robinson families got started. But in the early days, any son of Robert or Robin could become the founder of a family under the name of Robertson or Robinson.)

This completes the sketch of the Martin family with the exception of my father, John Neely Martin, and his descendants, whose history will follow in succeeding pages.*

_____________
*1943 text: "A remarkable fact of this family was their health and longevity except the eldest, Isabella, who died in young womanhood soon after her marriage. The four brothers all lived beyond the age of 80 years. My father, John Neely, was past 90 at the time of his death in 1923. William Thomas died near the same time at the age of 88. James Lewis had lived to be 89, and Uncle Parker was beyond 80 when he died. Of the sisters, Serilda lived to be 93, and Aunt Rhoda was 78 at the time of her death. Aunt Mary met an accidental death at her home in Arkansas when she was about the age of 50."

-148-


VII. John Neely and Rachel Elvina Martin

My father, John Neely Martin, was the second son (third child) of John and Ann Neely Martin. He was born in January 1833 in the family home at Kickapoo. Grandfather owned 80 acres of good prairie land just north of the Kickapoo timber, a little more than a mile south of the present town of Loxa (or Stockton) between Mattoon and Charleston.

It has been said already that the family moved to what is now Whitley Township, Moultrie County, in 1838, when my father was but five years of age. He and his two brothers broke out most of the prairie land of Grandfather's farm. A big sod plow was used, drawn by a team of three yokes of cattle. It took all three of the boys to manage the outfit one to drive and guide the cattle, and the other two at the plow, one to hold the handles, the other to keep the plow in the ground, sometimes by riding on the front end of the beam.

When most of the hardest work of breaking the prairie grass sod was done, the young men concluded that running a mill would be more to their taste, and they persuaded their father to sell the farm and build a mill over at the point

-149-


where Whitley Creek joins the Okaw River.* The mill enterprise was a failure. Even when there was plenty of water to turn the large wheel of the mill, the water fall over the dam was only a few feet, so that not enough power was developed. They were not informed in the philosophy of the water wheel and made the strange mistake of thinking that the potential power or force depended upon the length instead of the height of the water head. The water was dammed for a mile or so, but the level was only a few feet above the wheel.

*1943 text: "I am not certain whether the mill dam was built in the channel of the creek or upon the river. The mill was well constructed with burrs for grinding both corn and wheat, and with saws for the manufacture of lumber."

Grandfather may never have understood the cause of the failure, but he soon saw that he was losing money, and he resold the outfit and it was moved to Missouri. He died soon afterward, in 1856.

While the mill enterprise was a failure, Grandfather did not lose much money in the venture. But it was a mistake to sell 400 acres of good prairie land for $7.00 or less per acre and invest in poorer land. The probate files and records show a personal estate of $4700, besides the cheap river land in his possession. His Whitley farm had been sold for less than three thousand dollars. It was that sale that was a bad move.**

** 1943 text: "Grandfather was left with a hundred or more acres of land near the mill site, which had been acquired for the saw timber. This he conveyed to his youngest daughters, unmarried at the time. He died soon after, in 1856."

-150-



In 1853 when Father was a few months past 20 years of age, he married his cousin, Rachel Elvina, daughter of Joel Figley and Elizabeth Clemmens Martin. She was born April, 1832, and was therefore 21 years of age at the time of the marriage.

They lived near the mill site until the mill was closed down, when they moved to the North Okaw settlement near where Mother's parents then lived. In the first few years, three children were born, all dying in infancy. Their names were William Harvey, J ames Benton, and Narcissa.

In the fall of 1858, Father bought from James Hostetler a tract of 20 acres in the northeast comer of Section 8 in Whitley Township, and built a one-room house.* He had learned the trade of carpenter and then had no intention of developing a farm. Howev er, he kept making small purchases through a long term of years, until he had bought altogether 140 acres (40 of which he sold to my brother, and 20 to my brother in law). He also about 1860 bought a railroad tract of prairie land, 40 or 80 acres, a mile or two south of Bruce; but at the beginning of the War, carpenter work ceased, and fearing that he would not be able to make the payments, he sold his contract for a little more than he had paid for it. Later the railroad company extended the time of pa yments and he realized that he could have paid out on the land, and that he had made a mistake in

*1943 text: "They lived for five or six years on rented land, and in 1859 moved to a new home of their own at Lynn Creek, where they lived for fifty years. They moved to Sullivan, but soon after in June 1909 Mother died at an age a little over 77 years. Father lived until April 1923, dying a few weeks after his 90th birthday."

-151-

abandoning the claim. Possibly he was too cautious, but on the other hand he was relieved of many worries that adventurous people have. There was probably never a time in his life that he felt or feared that he was losing money, and there never was a ti me that he was burdened with debts that he was unable to pay.

He always had credit at the stores, but never ran large bills. When he bought on credit he always knew about when and how he would be able to pay, usually with money he earned at his trade, as he seldom had much of value to sell.

He traded mostly at Windsor or Sullivan. At Sullivan I think he traded almost entirely at Judge Eden's [Joseph Edgar Eden] store. I remember coming to Eden's store about 1867, I think, when I was 8 years of age. The store was in a large room just south of the Eden hotel, where the First National Bank is now. It was rather cool, and while standing near the big stove I looked around and saw hanging in several places cards: "We sell for cash only," and "Please do not ask for credit." While we were standi ng there Judge Eden came in, and after a few words of greeting asked, "Well, what can we do for you this morning?" Father said ' "I don't know how much; these cards are a little discouraging." The Judge leaned over a little (he was quite tall) and said, n ot very loud, "Young man, you know quite well that those cards were not put up for you!" He then went with us to one of his clerks and said, "Let Mr. Martin have anything he wants to buy and give him all the credit he asks for." I think Father was not in any way surprised, and took it as only a matter of course, but the incident gave me one of the proudest moments of my life.

The great financial and industrial panic of 1873, like the disturbances occasioned by the beginning of the Civil War, checked building operations; and Father gave up contracting

-152-

altogether. He did a little work at his trade in the next few years, but only for wages.

In 1871 he tried to get the contract for building a new school house in the Whitfield district. He and Aaron Merkle had often worked together -- usually one helping the other -- as they took contracts separately. Merkle was on the board of directors and could not take the contract himself, but he could help Father with the work if he did not share in the profits of the contract. They made together the estimate for Father's bid, which was about $1500. However, the low bid was about $200 less, and I thi nk Mr. Merkle was a little pleased when he learned that the contractor, Henry Sutton, had lost money, or at least made no profits on the job.

In 1871 and 1872, Father had a contract for making railroad ties in Hugh Simper's timber on Whitley Creek. There was a narrow ridge along the creek bluff that was covered with fine white oak and burr oak trees. He hired Jack Waggoner to help him in cutt ing down the trees and sawing and splitting the logs. Also Jack would score (or had to drop) the sides of the pieces, and Father would shape and smooth the ties with the broadaxe. He got 15 cents for each tie, and they made 30 or more a day. Father mad e enough money to buy and pay for the 15 acre tract he was working, most of which was good bottom land. Two or three years before, he had bought a fifteen acre tract in the same 40 acres, and a little later he bought the other 10 acres. For several year s -- 10 or 12 -- he had spent a good part of the winters hewing out the heavy frame timbers for houses and barns in the Whitley Creek timber, and put them into buildings on the prairie in the summer and fall months.

But after 1873 his carpenter work was only occasional. In 1875 he bought the 20 acre tract where the Harpsters now

-153-

live, and in this transaction he borrowed $600.00 of Dr. Samuel R. Oliver at 8 per cent interest, and this debt he did not pay for 20 years, after he had paid $960 in interest. In the meantime he had bought and paid for other land, and had built a new ho use on the home place, on the Lynn Creek hill.

Father was elected township clerk in 1868, defeating Thomas Boyd, the Republican candidate by ten majority. The next year he declined to run and W.H. Garrett was nominated. Dr. Oliver and one or two other Democrats united against Mr. Garrett and elected Uncle Alex Edwards by a majority of 25. Next year, Father was again a candidate and defeated Uncle Alex by ten majority. He was reelected each year until 1873, when he was elected Justice of the Peace, an office which he held for several terms. About 1898 he was again nominated for Township Clerk, but was defeated by the Republic candidate, Thomas Boyd, the same man he had defeated 30 years before.

He always had an interest in politics and was well informed on national issues. He did not talk much in crowds, but in companies of two or three he could discuss politics or religion and hold his own with anybody. He was never physically over strong, bu t was usually in good health and was a good steady, though not speedy, worker.

In thinking about my father's occupation, I recall that I do not remember seeing him idle. If he was not at work making or mending something, he was either reading or writing.

He had some manual skills in many trades. He worked in wood and leather, and if he had a forge and tools he could have worked with iron and steel.

-154-

In the winter when it was too cold or too wet to work in the timber, he was busy in the house or shop. He made feed baskets of split hickory that were artistic as well as strong, serviceable and durable. He could clean, oil and even repair a clock. I r emember that a traveling watch and clock man one winter day offered work on our tall clock. When Father told him that he did that himself, the fellow appeared greatly amused. He asked, "What do you do if you find that a pivot of a wheel has worn its cas ing?" "I mend it." "How?" "I put into the bearing a thin piece of brass or copper." "Oh," said the man, "you have no tools to do that sort of work." "Why," said Father, "all the tools you need are a file and a claw hammer." The man began gathering up hi s things, saying, "There is no use of fooling away time on you. A file and a claw hammer!" Father had the heartiest and longest spell of laughter that I ever saw him have, and it was repeated many times when he thought of the incident.*

*1943 text: "He led a quiet but an ever active life, up to and through his 88th year, and continued his study and reading a year or more longer. He read carefully and attentively a six-volume copy of Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Ro man Empire in the last two years of his life."

VIII. Me, Myself

I was the third child of the family, born November 7, 1859. I was named John Ivory, the first a family name after my Father and Grandfather. The second name was for a friend of the family, Ivory Quimby, a lawyer then located at Monmouth, Illinois .**

**1943 text: "I am grateful to my father for not allowing me to be burdened with the last name of the barrister."

-155-

Most people called me by the second name, but when I started to school I signed "John I. Martin." Usually when it got in print, it appeared as "John J." which annoyed me not a little, and especially for the reason that I had a cousin by that name. I cons idered the plan of writing the full name, "John Ivory" -- a good many people called me that anyway. I also thought of "J. Ivory," but I never liked that form. Mother suggested that I write it "Ivory J." or "I.J.", and that is what I decided to do. Thi s was in 1878, when I was in my 19th year. At first I used just the name "Ivory," but later I began writing "J" for a middle initial.

The first thing I remember in my life occurred, I think, when I was about two years of age, or possibly younger. I had fallen asleep on the floor and under a table. It was one of those old style drop-leaf affairs, and when the leaf was down, the edge of the table cloth reached the floor. Anyway, when I awoke it was entirely dark around me, but I could hear people talking out in the room. I at once made myself heard, and was soon helped out into the open where I could see. A woman, probably one of my aunts, held me on her lap until Mother came into the room. I remember there was some talk that I did not understand, but which I felt sure was about myself, and when Mother laughed at something that was said, I was mad all over, and I think I said so in the only way a baby can.

The next incident was in the summer before I was three. There was a "clearing," as it was called, in front of our house along the public road, and at the end of the clearing was thick timber with some underbrush. I remember seeing a buggy, in which were two men driving two horses, each with a white stripe down its face, dash out of the timber on the east and in a moment disappear on the west. It appeared wonderful at the time and it made an impression that I never forgot.

-156-

The next distinct recollection I have is of my Uncle Parker going to the War. It was in the summer of 1863, a few months before I was four years old. Uncle Jeff, my mother's brother, went at the same time.

I have a somewhat confused recollection of the last year or two of the War. Mother had two brothers in the Union Army, and her oldest brother, who lived in Texas, had been drafted into the Southern Army. She hated the War, and she blamed both the abolit ionist agitators and the secessionists, and thought they were equally to blame.

The soldiers stationed at Mattoon occasionally made night raids into the country, and sometimes entered the homes of Democrats, seizing guns or searching for evidence of disloyalty. We were never disturbed, but I remember one night someone tapped on a wi ndow and then said the soldiers were out on another raid. Mother was alarmed, but Father said there was no danger. He stepped outside and listened awhile before going back to bed. Later I was told that one night Father and Uncle Jim Hostetler kept vigi l at a point where they could watch both their homes, but I knew nothing about it at the time.

Neither of them belonged to any club or political organization, and neither did any wild talking, so that none of the spies would have had anything to report to the Mattoon camp. So there was really no danger of their being disturbed.

I remember when Uncle Parker came home just before Christmas in 1864. He had served about 17 months without a furlough. He had 30 days leave, which was later extended, and he did not go back until he went for his discharge.

-157-

The next definite recollection is the assassination of Lincoln, which we probably heard in a day or two. I remember a woman who sometimes helped Mother with her work (the woman's name was Susan Bullick). When Mother told her, she said, "I'm glad of it." Mother said a plenty to her, and I think changed her mind about it.

One gift that Mother had was the use of plain speech. There was never any doubt of her meaning. One of her nephews said long afterwards, "When Aunt Rachel thought that anything needed to be said to anyone, she did not hunt around for someone to say it; she just said it herself."

I have a few more memories of 1863 and 1864, possibly as early as the summer of 1862. It is about my great grandfather James Scott Martin, and my grandfather Joel Figley and my grandmother Elizabeth Clemmens. They were usually at our house once a month at the Baptist meetings at the Lynn Creek Church. Grandfather was the regular pastor of the Church, but Dalby often preached the main Sunday sermon. My great grandfather, I think, came at other times too. I remember seeing him romp with my brother, who at the time was just big enough to walk, which would mean that I was a little over three. I think the last time I saw him was in the fall of 1864, two or three months before I was five. He had walked from his home a mile east of Bruce, stopping for a v isit with Uncle Gilbert and Aunt Patsey Waggoner, and resting again at the home of the Elders. He came suddenly upon my brother and me as we were playing at the edge of the orchard. He was not tall, 5 feet and 8 or 9 inches, but was rather stout, with a face full, round and

-158-

ruddy, and with merry twinkling eyes. I have never seen a finer looking old gentleman.*

* 1943: "He came upon me and my brother with his plump, round face red and smiling. He wore a bright colored cap knit with wool yarn, and with a tasseled top. He was carrying a heavy walking stick on his arm."

Grandfather was more sober and less playful -- probably the dignity becoming a preacher had to be maintained. But still more serious yet was my grandmother. She was kind and loving enough, but seldom smiled and never laughed as Mother frequently did. L ife had been a serious business for Grandmother. with a large family and a husband handicapped by his lameness. I neglected to say when writing of him a few pages back that he had learned to mend, and even to make, shoes; and so with his working family a nd little farm, the family was self-sustaining.

In my seventh year, March 6, 1866, 1 was a fascinated observer of a tornado that moved in a northeast by east course from the present site of Bruce to about the present location of the town of Allenville. We were more than two miles away and could not se e the surface disturbance, only the funnel-shaped black cloud that moved with a whirling and rocking (like a spinning top) motion. The folks standing around me called it a hurricane -- the first time I had heard the word.

I think there have been only two real tornados through Moultrie County, though there have been other more or less destructive storms. The first tornado is the one which occurred in March 1866. The other was the one that did such destructive work in Matt oon and Charleston in the summer of 1917. It missed the towns of Shelby County,


-159-

moving south of Findlay and north of Windsor. It disturbed some farm improvements through Moultrie County, and hit a few people on the roads along its course. The destruction in Mattoon and Charleston was appalling. It will be noticed that both of thes e tornados went along courses south of the river.

We had good neighbors, and I was intimate with the children of a half dozen families -- the Elders, Hostetlers, Harrisons, Garretts, Merkles and Phillips. At school there were others. My brother had two pals, Warren Hillingost and Charley Edwards. Joe Merkle was my favorite among boys of my age, after the Elders moved away, and I had a good friend in Dave Maxedon, a boy three or four years older than myself. He was steadily loyal and recklessly brave, and I valued him as a sort of protector.

In 1866 I went to a summer school at Smyser to a good teacher, whose name was Gainer. My recollections are mainly of the playground. I remember one of the larger boys, Jake Burch, getting a whipping. I think that was the only incident of the kind in th e whole term. Most teachers then made a sterner record.

About this time, the district boundary lines were readjusted, and we found ourselves in the Whitfield district; and the summer of 1867 1 attended school taught by Sarah C. Scott (afterward Sadie Scott of the Scott sisters, dressmakers in Sullivan). The w inter school was taught by John Mason, the jolly Old Pedagogue, one of the best teachers of his day.

By this time, my brother Joel Kester (born January 1861) had became of school age, and went to the summer term under Miss Scott, and except in bad weather to Mason. A younger brother, Samuel Oliver, born in 1862 had died

-160-

when a little past two years of age. A sister, Sarah Elvina, born in 1864, lived until January 1884. She was married to Charles Batson. She and my brothers made good companions during our years of childhood, and I think we were as happy as the a verage children of our day. A younger sister, Susannah, died when about two years of age. Her death and that of Sammy were the only bereavements of our childhood.*

*1943 note: "Father and Mother had the distressing misfortune of losing five children in early childhood. Their names were James, William Harvey, Nerissa, Samuel Oliver, and Susannah."

I think Mason taught the summer term in 1868. And I think it was this school that Bill Wrackley attended. He was the counterpart of Huck Finn, and when I read Mark Twains story, I recognized the portrait. I never think of one without recalling the othe r. Bill's father was tenant on the Whitfield farm and he was about nine years of age.

One morning he came to school without his dinner bucket -- said he never wanted dinner anyway. School, or "books" it was called, always started as soon as enough pupils arrived. In a short time Mrs. Wrackley appeared, and seeing her son through an open window, she shouted, "Bill Wrackley, come here this minute; you knowed your father wanted you to chop corn." Bill, without asking leave, grabbed his hat and ran.

It has probably always been a teacher problem to keep children busy who had not learned to read. One of the schemes was to have them copy (in print, not script) on the slate from the reader. Bill had not read beyond the first reader. One day he got int o trouble for printing something

-161-

that was not in the book. He was writing or printing from the famous "cat and kit" page of McGuffey's reader. Frazier Philips told us what happened. He had printed:

"See the cat.
See the kit.
The cat is the dam of the kit."

All of which was very well, but Bill had added:

"Dam the cat!"

I doubt if this is a true story of Bill Wrackley. I have since read a similar story, and I suspect that Frazier had read something of the kind before crediting it to Bill.

The Wrackley family moved away about this time. Bill may be living yet, at the age of 81 or 82 years.

At the Whitfield school they sometimes let a good teacher go on account of salary, and for the fall and winter term 1868-1869, George W. Rare was employed. He was a well educated, likeable young man, and probably would have been successful if he had not been the successor of Mason. I think he had the noisiest school I ever saw. An unusual situation was that he had no trouble with the larger pupils, but with the boys -- and girls too -- of the intermediate ages.

The large boys did not start until after corn husking -- except one young man who had spent his boyhood in the army, an age when he should have been in school. This was William Edward Waggoner -- Will Ed, he was called. 1868 was a presidential election y ear -- the Grant and Seymour campaign. All the boys were Democrats except Will Ed, and he kept them all fighting mad. One day at noon John Phillips, one of the large boys, stopped at the school, and we --

-162-

Joe Merkle, Harry Reed, Marion Phillips, and others -- proceeded to tell John all the mean things that Will Ed had said. We hoped to start a fight, but John and Will Ed only laughed about it. Realizing that we were made game of, we refused to get excite d any more. Our taunt was, "O you were afraid to talk that way to John Phillips, a man of your size, etc. etc."

I remember one morning a great crowd of Democrats met at the Whitfield cross roads and formed a mile long procession to go to Shelby to hear Clement L. Valandingham speak. I wanted to go, and I think if I had asked Father, who was in the procession, he w ould have taken me along. I usually went with him any place I wanted to go.

After Grant was elected with a big majority, people began to say, "He is the man on horseback we have been expecting and fearing. He is in for life." They repeated the same gloomy comment when he was again elected in 1872. Some people had said something similar on Jackson's election in 1832, and some childish people have similar apprehensions about Roosevelt now.

Another sister, Nancy Emmeline, was born October 11, 1870. She was six years of age when I first began school work away from home, and for that reason I never had the intimate companionship with her that I did with Joe and Sarah.

Mason taught a summer term at Smyser in 1869, and I attended. I was then past 9 years of age. I felt like an outsider in this school. Mason taught at the Whitfield school in 1869 and 1870 (fall, winter and spring). My Aunt Lurana lived with us and wen t to school. The summer term was ended or closed with an entertainment and picnic in the

-163-

grove. Mr. Stearns, who was County Superintendent of Schools, together with several Sullivan people came, and we learned soon after that Mason had been elected principal or superintendent of the Sullivan schools.

The school directors employed Frank Peadro for the fall and winter of 1870 and 1871. Frank had been a pupil in the school, but it was said that the large boys were going to quit school and it was thought he could get along with the others -- and he did, in a way, but the school was not a success.

The next teacher, John Wilson,, was a stern disciplinarian, but not a very good teacher. After working for four months, he let Bob Peadro finish the term. Here is a sample case of Wilson's "discipline." He always carried a switch in his hand which he us ed several times a day -- sometimes only three or four blows, and sometimes a dozen or more. The recitation bench was on a rostrum at the end of the room, and the class faced the bench. One morning I was in the class and just in front of me a girl about my age, 11 or 12 was seated, and she was watching two boys on the seat behind her, who were writing or perhaps drawing a picture on a slate. Wilson spoke to her sharply and told her to turn around in her seat. But after a while she turned her head and looked ba ck. Wilson stepped from the rostrum and gave her a dozen stinging blows across her shoulders. 1 suspect that this incident had something to do with his resignation, which came two or three weeks later, although I never heard the matter discussed except b y some of the pupils. The girl, Nellie Makepeace, was a quiet, well-behaved pupil, and her punishment was an inexcusable outrage.

Wilson resigned, he said, because he had purchased an interest in a store at Summit (now Gays) of his brother-in-law, Capt. Samuel F. Gammill. The partnership did not

-164-

"jell", and Wilson and his brother started a store of their own. (The railroad station here was called Summit because it was, as the railroad survey showed, the highest point between Terre Haute and the Mississippi. The old Whitley post office was moved to this station. The post office could not be called Summit because there was then a post office by that name near Chicago. Both the station and the post office were named Gays in 1886. The Gammill store was started in 1865 by Capt. Gammill and his fa ther, the firm being known as Gammill & Son. It bears the same name today, although I am not sure whether a father and son are now the owners.)

Our next teacher, John Pennell Boggs, was a picturesque character and, notwithstanding his peculiarities, was a pretty good teacher -- the best we had had since Mason.

Another presidential election had come around -- the Grant and Greeley campaign of 1872. Both candidates were Republicans, although Grant had been a Democrat until he was given the Republican nomination four years before in 1868, while Greeley had been f irst a Whig and then a charter member of the Republican Party. He was now the liberal (or progressive) Republican candidate, and had been endorsed by the Democrats.

Father was not for Greeley, and I did not take much interest in the campaign. At that time, there were only three or four (I can think of only three) Republican voters in our district, and two of them -- Jim Bence and John True Edwards -- were for Greele y. But several Democrats, including the Whitfields, were not, although they were not for Grant either.

1873 was the first year of the great panic which lasted six or seven years -- although the first two or three years were

-165-

the worst. The fall and winter terms of school, 1873-74, were taught by a Mr. Ferguson. I think his initials were F.J., but I am not sure. He appeared well educated and was a fairly good teacher. He was a good penman. Instead of teaching writing thro ughout the term, he had one week of intense instruction and practice. I was then 14 years of age, and had never written much -- and that little with a pencil. After a week's time, I could write pretty well, better than I do now.

Charley Warden taught a summer term either in 1873 or 1874, but I worked on the farm and did not attend. Joe and Sarah did. This term finished one event that was talked about for fifty years. In that day, a common punishment was to make a pupil stand o n the floor, sometimes with a clown or dunce hat on his head. Abram Jones, the Baptist minister, had a family of three daughters and two sons, and they were all what was called "headstrong." Tabitha, one of the daughters, 14 years old, was particularly w illful. One day for some slight fault, Warden ordered her to take her book and stand in the corner of the room, and she refused to obey. He threatened to whip her, but she still refused. He then sent a boy for a switch. He wore out three switches on h er shoulders before she yielded. The girl did not seem to mind the punishment much -- not so much as the teacher, who was almost a nervous wreck at the close. It is hoped that he learned never to try to compel a child by punishment to do anything it ref uses to do.

Mr. Jones, the preacher, had an unfortunate pastorate at the Whitfield Church. A dispute of some kind with Baylis Peadro, father of Frank and Bob, was the start of the trouble, and it grew until the church was divided into hostile groups. The Separate B aptist Association was unable to settle the matter and suspended membership in the Association for one year. Jones, who led the largest part or group in the church, then united with the Missionary Baptist

-166-

Association. The other group was then reinstated in the Separate Baptist Association, and claimed the ownership of the church building. However, when the title was examined, it was found that the deed had been made to the Whitfield Baptist Church, witho ut specifying the kind of Baptist denomination. As both groups claimed to be the Whitfield Church, and as the Jones group was in possession, there appeared to be no legal remedy. After a long term of years, the Missionary Baptist ceased to hold meetings in the church, and the Separate Baptist group took charge, but all of the old contestants had passed away. The strife divided the neighborhood in bitterly hostile factions for many years. It happened that the Warden family belonged to the Jones faction . Otherwise the school incident heretofore mentioned might have been more unpleasant. As it was, Mr. Jones was reported to have said that he was glad Tabitha had found someone she had to obey.

Until my fourteenth year, I had never taken school very seriously. I could write and read fairly well, and had studied the arithmetic text, until I knew the simple processes very well. While I neglected school, I had become a steady reader of books, and I think Mother had noticed it. Anyway just before school began in the fall of 1874, Father asked me what new books I would need for school, and said I might start at the beginning of the term, as they could gather the corn without my help. I was elated and felt like I was starting in a new life. I told him I would need a grammar (I had not studied it before), a history, and an advanced geography. We went to town in a day or two and bought them.*

*1943 text: "I dawdled through school to my 13th or 14th year, and then began study in earnest. In the next two years, I gathered more text book knowledge than I had learned in all the previous years."

-167-

Polk Rose was the teacher that year -- the wisest, and in most things, the best teacher I ever had. I kept up my enthusiasm throughout the term and was indignant because the directors saved $15 per month by employing another teacher next year. However, I found that Gideon A. Edwards was an excellent teacher. His education was broader, especially in history and literature, but Rose excelled him in intensity of application.

I think it was very fortunate that just at this critical time, I had these two splendid teachers. Then in the summer of 1876, I attended a six-weeks summer term in Sullivan and had for teachers Mr. Rose, Henry L. Boltwood (the most scholarly man I ever k new), and Eunice J. Bastian -- as fine a group of instructors as could be found or wished.

In the years 1873, 1874, and 1875, we had a debatingg society that met once a week at the Whitfield school house. It was organized by the school boys, but gradually older people took it over, and only the more persistent boys continued to participate. T hey debated every sort of question except those involving political or religious controversy. They debated the Darwinian theory, although none of them knew much about it. It was in this debate that George M. Edwards said that one of his opponents (it mu st have been Fred or Bob Peadro) who had been in college when Darwin's Descent of Man was first published, came one day upon a bunch of students listening to a teacher who was explaining the theory. Our friend listened until he got the drift of th e talk, and then interrupted with a question, "Do you mean to say that I have been developed from an ape?" "Well," said the teacher, "something may have interfered with

-168-

your development." The joke may not have been original with him but I have never seen it in print nor heard it anywhere else.

The debates were carried on for about two years, but were discontinued because some of the young men of the neighborhood became disorderly at the meetings.

In the fall of 1876, five weeks before I became 17, 1 began teaching.*

*1943 text: "I passed the teachers examination in March 1876 and was promised a certificate as soon as I reached my 17th birthday. However, I was offered a contract to teach in a school in Coles County, and neglecting to write my age on t he examination paper, I was given a license to teach in that county and began my first school five weeks before I was seventeen."

My sister Sarah was married in the spring of 1883 to Charles Batson, an industrious young man, who had worked for Father on the farm at intervals for two or three years. She died in less than a year after her marriage. I do not remember seeing Charley a t the funeral. He married again, but lived only a few years. One son by this second marriage, Loren Batson, served in the World War and attained the rank of First Lieutenant. He was the Democratic nominee for circuit clerk in 1920, but was defeated in the Republican landslide of that year. Later he obtained a position in the postal service at Chicago.

After I began teaching school, Joe decided to study more attentively. For the next five years, they had a succession of good teachers -- W.M. Barker, Polk Rose, and George N. Snapp. He learned the common school subjects much more

-169-

thoroughly than I had done in school. But I kept up my studies while teaching, and in fact all through life, so that my limited years in school did not matter so much. Nancy went to school through these years and later, and I think obtained a fair commo n school education.

My first school was at the old Wade School in North Okaw, Coles County. I was at home with the family two winters -- 1877 and 1878 when I taught at Bruce, and again in 1880 while I was teaching in what was then called the Noble, or Russell, School. I ta ught two years at the Fairview, or Maddux, School near Arthur, 1878 and 1879-80. My last school work, also two years (1881-1883), was near Loxa, Coles County.

In April 1883, I became Deputy County Clerk under Charles Shuman, and thereafter my home was in Sullivan. In April 1885, I became editor of the Sullivan Progress.*

* 1943 text: "I was in the publishing business or making abstracts of title from that time to this, over a period of 58 years. For about 15 years I had both abstract and newspaper on my hands (or in my hair)."

My marriage with Rose Eden, daughter of John Rice and Phoebe Roxana Meeker Eden, was on Wednesday evening, June 30, 1886.

My brother, Joel Kester Martin, and my wife's sister, Belle Eden, were married in 1891. Joe had been admitted to the bar, and for more than a year he was associated with Judge Jonathan Meeker. During the middle 1890's he was engaged in farming, first on his own land in Whitley Township, and then on Mr. Eden's farm near Sullivan. In 1899 he formed a law partnership with Mr. Eden that continued until Mr.

-170-

Eden's death in 1909. He was elected City Attorney in 1901 and chosen States Attorney in 1908. He held one or the other of these offices continuously until his health failed in 1919, when he moved to California, where he remained for two or three years. He had lived on the farm during all the time he had practiced law.

They had seven children, but the first one died in infancy. The names of the other six were:

Edgar Ivory, who served over seas in the World War.

Blanche Rachel,, who died in young womanhood. She was a talented, ambitious girl, studious and well educated. She was a graduate of the Sullivan High School and the State Normal University.

The second daughter, Rose Emmeline, married R.F.Denton, who was a shoe salesman. They had two children, Sara Belle and Richard. They moved to California about 1920. Emma died at their home in Riverside a few years ago.

Rice Clemmens, another son, died at the age of 13 years. He was a bright, energetic lad, too active perhaps for his personal welfare.

Grace, the third daughter, was another ambitious student. She graduated from the State Normal University, and after teaching in Sullivan a few years, moved to California, where she married.

Joel Kenneth Martin, the youngest son, is in the abstract of title business in Sullivan.

-171-

My sister, Nancy Emmeline, was married to William Ellis Harpster, whose home was in Fayette County. They have lived in the same place, a part of Father's home farm, for more than forty years. Their eldest daughter, Ethel, married Fred Elder. The y have two daughters and two sons. Ethel and Fred are now living in Shelby County, not far from Neoga.

The eldest son of the Harpsters is William Arnold Harpster. He served overseas in an artillery unit in the World War. He married __________, and they have two daughters.

The second son, Lawrence Martin Harpster, married __________ Robinson, daughter of May and granddaughter of Aunt Ruth. So Lawrence and his wife are distantly related, having two great grandparents in common, Joel Figley and Elizabeth Clemmens Martin. Th ey have two sons, and live near Greencastle, Indiana.

The youngest son of Ellis and Nancy Harpster, Wesley Euphrates Harpster, married Anabel Vogel. They have three (or more) interesting children. Wesley is a competent farmer, and they live on one of the John Smyser farms in Whitley Township.

An unmarried daughter, Edith Harpster, is a business secretary, and has been employed in Chicago and Indianapolis.

Now I will provide my immediate family record. I will have to let my children and grandchildren make and write their own history. I hope they will all live happily and, above all, honorably and prudently. I know a good deal of our family history for mo re than a century and a half. It has not been brilliant, but neither has it been dishonorable.

-172-

Ivory J. (or John Ivory) Martin was born November 7, 1859.

Rose Eden Martin was born November 2, 1858; she died November 5, 1907.

They were married Wednesday, June 30, 1886, Thomas E. Edwards officiating clergyman.

Children:

Olive Eden Martin, April 29, 1887.

John Eden Martin,, April 19, 1889.

Joel Neely Martin, January 13, 1891.

Elvina Martin, December 21, 1892; died December 25, 1896.

Robert Walter Martin, February 16, 1895.

Mabel Eden Martin, January 8, 1899.

IX. The Martins -- A Recapitulation

John Martin and Sarah Scott, Kentucky pioneers natives of Virginia.

Their sons: Richard and Stephen, who moved to Iowa and Missouri. Samuel, John, William Harvey and James Scott, who came first to Southern Illinois. Later Samuel, William Harvey and James Scott came to what is now Coles County and settled in and along th e Kickapoo timber between Charleston and Mattoon.

-173-

William H. and James S. and most of their children, who had married and had families of their own, moved to the Whitley settlement in Moultrie County.

W.H. Martin's family nearly all later moved to Texas, Missouri and Minnesota. The only representatives of the family of William Harvey Martin in Illinois, so far as I know, are the Elders, who are quite numerous, all of whom are descendants of Jane Martin Elder, a daughter of W.H. Martin. Also, there are the descendants of Henry Whitaker Martin, a grandson of W.H. Martin, through his only son, John James Martin, who left su rviving him a son, Henry Martin, and several children of a deceased son.

James Scott Martin married Mary Figley. They had five sons, whose names were Samuel, Joel Figley, John, Rezin, Charles and James Frost. Their daughters are not so well known: Sarah Critsinger, Euphamia Neely, Emily Lewis, and probably two others who mar ried and stayed in Southern Illinois.

Nothing has been said of the daughters of John and Sarah Scott Martin. I have heard of only one, Sarah Guyman, the wife of a Baptist preacher who lived at Paris.

I think John Martin remained in Southern Illinois. I have no information on his family.

Samuel Martin was one of the three brothers who came to the Kickapoo settlement. He had three sons. One son, John, married Martha Cassidy. They had one son, Alexander, and four daughters -- Sarah, Mary (Edwards), Emma (Covey) and Bessie. Two sons of S amuel died in early manhood, but each was survived by sons -- James and Charles, and Moses Williams and (I do not remember

-174-

if I ever knew the name of the other. He lived with his mother and stepfather in Edgar County.)

Joel Figley Martin, son of James Scott and Mary Figley Martin, married Elizabeth Clemmens. They had five sons: James, Samuel, Rezin, Levi, and Thomas Jefferson (I used to think he looked like the portraits of Jefferson); and seven daughters: Rachel Elvin a (Martin), Lucy Jane (Robinson), Louisa Ann (Holmer), Pollyanna (Yarber), Rebecca (Stephens), Ruth Anne (Robinson) and Lurana (Fulton).

John Martin, another son of James Scott and Mary Figley Martin, married Ann Neely. They had four sons: James Lewis, John Neely, William Thomas, and Daniel Parker; and four daughters: Isabel, Rhoda, Serilda and Mary.

Certain remarkable facts are noteworthy. There was not a death in either family of my two grandfathers until the maturity of each child. The first death in the family of eight of John and Ann Neely Martin was that of Isabel (Aunt Ibbie) after her marria ge. The first death in the family of Joel Figley and Elizabeth Clemmens Martin (5 sons and 7 daughters) was the eldest son, James Scott Martin, Jr. He left a widow and two children. Of the remaining children of John and Ann Neely Martin, 7 in number, th ere was not another death for 65 years, except one accident. The ages of the six who died of natural causes were: 93, 90, 89, 88, 78, and 76. Aunt Serilda was 93, and Uncle Parker was the junior at 76 -- Aunt Rhoda was 78. My great uncle James Frost Ma rtin was 93. Cousin Henry Whitaker Martin reached the advanced age of 96.

Rezin C. Martin, son of James Scott and Mary Figley Martin married Pollyann Clemmens. Their sons were Wesley, Darius Litford, Joseph (perhaps it was Joel),

-175-

William, and Worley. Daughters were Ruth (Smith), Mary Jane (Monson), Phoebe (Waggoner), and Sarah.

James Frost Martin, son of James Scott and Mary Figley Martin, was married twice but I do not know the names of his wives. He had three sons and one daughter. One son, Miles, married my aunt Rhoda. A second son married Louisa Lane. The other son, Sylv ester, moved to Missouri when he married. The daughter, Emily, married Pete Whitaker.

I know but little about my grandfather's brother, Samuel. He died comparatively young -- I have heard of two of his sons, George and Nelson.

James Lewis Martin married Emily Waggoner. They had three sons: John Henry (died when about 18 years age), James Bayley (who now lives in the State of Washington), and George, who, if living, resides in Missouri. Their daughters were Mary Ann (Humphreys ), Sarah (Powell), Catherine (Thomason), Marcissa (Bundy), are Leucretia (Howard -- second husband, Henderson).

John Neely Martin, son of John and Ann Neely Martin, married Rachel Elvina Martin. Three sons and two daughters died in infancy. Their names were William Harvey, James Benton, and Samuel Oliver, and the daughters were Narcissa and Susan. Those who reac hed adult life are Ivory J. (John Ivory), Joel Kester, Sarah Elvina (Batson), Nancy Emmeline (Harpster).

William Thomas Martin, son of John and Ann Neely Martin, married Jane Waggoner. Their sons were Francis Marion, John Dawson and William Isaac. Daughters were Nancy Ann (Waggoner), Sarah (Baugher), Mary (Lane),

-176-

Elizabeth (Sutton), Violet (Hostetler), and Dora (Thompson).

Daniel Parker Martin, son of John and Ann Neely Martin, married Armand Fortner. They had two sons when they moved west. The oldest was John, and I do not remember the other (it was either James or William). They had one or two other children before the y were divorced. He married again, but I never heard his wife's name, and I do not know the names of their children.

-177-

17.
NOTE IN A HISTORY OF ALL NATIONS*

I.J. Martin, 1948

*I. J. Martin wrote this handwritten note in a copy of A History of All Nations, by S.G. Goodrich, N.Y., 1856 (2 vols.). The two volumes are in the library of John George, Urbana, Illinois.

This History of All Nations was printed and bound in a single volume of nearly 1200 pages about the year 1851.

My grandfather, John Martin, bought a copy of this early edition, and at the administrative sale of the property of his estate in 1856, the book was purchased by my uncle, James Lewis Martin.

When I was about 13 years of age, I borrowed it of my uncle. I read much of the book, especially in the first 5 or 6 hundred pages, which are contained in this first volume.

I had read some in a history of Greece which my father had obtained from the library of my other grandfather -- Joel Figley -- and so I paid less attention to the Greek story in the later chapters (in Vol. 2 of this edition), but I read most of the other stories of the history of Europe.

Father had bought from grandfather John's library a huge book quarto size and about 1000 pages -- The History of the Great West. It was another big book that needed a special stand, like a Webster dictionary or the family bible.

Nearly all of our best books came from the libraries of my two grandfathers. One of them, Joel Figley, was a preacher and from his came Seneca's Morals, etc.

-178-

18.
ROSE EDEN, I.J. MARTIN

WEDDING BRILLIANT AFFAIR*

*Moultrie County News, Centennial Edition, July 5, 1973, p. 6A.

The Marriage of I.J. Martin to Miss Rose Eden, second Daughter of Hon. John R. Eden of this City, June 30th, 1886.

"No more, no more, much honor aye betide
The lofty bridegroom and lovely bride;
That all of our succeeding days may say,
Each day appears like to a wedding day."
On Wednesday evening the last of June, the month of marriages, the wedding of I.J. Martin, Editor of THE SULLIVAN PROGRESS and Miss Rose Eden, second daughter of Congressman and Mrs. John R. Eden, was celebrated at the city residence of the bride's parent s in the presence of a numerous company of friends and relatives of the two influential families, and was one of the brilliant and noteworthy affairs that ever occurred in this city.

The superb cards issued the previous week were worthy tokens of the festivities that occurred. Owing to the high moral worth and attractive social qualities of both bride and groom, the joining together of their lives and fortunes has been attended with universal interest and solicitude.

On the evening of their marriage the weather was perfect. At 7:30 the guests who had not already arrived began to assemble. The beautiful Eden residence was brilliantly lighted, and the whole house decorated with plants and flowers.

-179-

By 8 o'clock the spacious parlors were filled to overflowing with the elite of the city and surrounding country, among whom were mingled notable friends of both families from a distance. Royally did Mr. and Mrs. Eden perform with the honors of the occasi on. Everything was made so congenial and pleasant for the guests that everyone appeared in the best possible spirits; a gayer, happier assembly never met to celebrate a nuptial ceremony.

By 8:15 o'clock more than one hundred and fifty guests had assembled, prominent among whom we noticed the following: Miss Jennie Robinson of Springfield, Miss Maggie Shutt of Paris, Miss Maggie Cloyd, Decatur; Mrs. W.G. Covey, Stockton; Miss Minnie Martin , Stockton; W.J. Mize, Decatur and J.J. Wilkinson, Argenta.

At 8:30 the hour for the ceremony, the Rev. Thos. Edwards, who was to unite the golden cords of love and destiny was in readiness. The wedding march began, the parents, relatives, and friends of the happy pair took their respective places of honor near the arch; the assembly arose as the bride and groom, preceded by their attendants, Miss Ella Lowe and City Attorney, F.M. Harbaugh, slowly descended the broad stair. The impressive and beautiful ceremony was performed and the binding words spoken by Rev . Edwards as only he can speak them. The responses of the bride and groom were clear and distinct, the ring was given and placed upon the bride's finger, the vows were repeated, and Ivory and Rose were husband and wife.

The bridge elegantly attired in a superb dress of cream colored silk, cut in basque style with plain demi-length sleeves and pompadour neck. The skirt portion being finished with full oval train and short panier draperies, and white veil, with white glov es and slippers, completed this

-180-

bewitchingly becoming costume. She also carried in her hand a lovely bouquet of white rosebuds and heliotropes.

Congratulations and well-wishes were showered upon the happy couple, after which the guests retired to the dining hall where the banquet tables stood groaning under the loads of pastry, fruits, and delicacies of the season, and there partook of the excell ently prepared and elegantly served repast.

After refreshments the guests disposed themselves about the elegant rooms and engaged in an informal and unbroken season of enjoyment, one of the most pleasant of which was the inspection of the very many rich and costly wedding presents, among which espe cially worthy of mention were the following:

Parlor set, five pieces -- Mr. and Mrs. Chas. Shuman, Mr. and Mrs. A.E.D. Scott, Mr. and Mrs. Walt Eden, Mr. and Mrs. W.H. Shinn, Mr. and Mrs. S.T. Foster,, Mr. and Mrs. McDonald, Mr. and Mrs. J.F. Eden, Mr. and Mrs. J.B. Titus, Mr. and Mrs. W.P. Corbin, Messrs. S.W. Wright, L.K. Scott, Frank Spitler, James Steele, Robert Ginn, R.M. Peadro, J.H. Baker, William Kirkwood and Oscar and Walter Rose.

Center table -- E.V. Hesket, Thos. Cairns, J.A. Shortess, Hick Haydon, Cash Green, Hugh Lilly and John Workman.

Oil painting of bridge -- Mr. and Mrs. A. Creech.

Silver sugar bowl, creamer and waste bowl, four bottle silver castor and toilet set -- W.A. Cash and wife, J.E. Eden and wife, G.W. Paine and wife, F.W. Henley and wife, W.W. Eden and wife, W.A. Steele and wife, Bruce Lowe and wife, D.F. Bristow and wife, N.O. Smyser and wife, G.W. Paine

-181-

and wife, F.W. Henley and wife, W.W. Eden and wife, W.A, Steele and wife, Bruce Lowe and wife, J.M. Cummins and wife, W.M. Marshal and wife, Mrs. Anna Welch, Miss Lizzie Ginn, Robt. Ginn, Mrs. A. Hollingsworth, Luther Lowe and wife, Misses Ada and Lute A shworth, Mary, Sarah and Hattie Powers, Lizzie Kellar, Mrs. M. Steele, Miss Edith Hoke, Mr. and Mrs. J.E. Steele, Mr. and Mrs. Alvin Waggoner, Will Haydon, Misses Kate, Nan and Belle Patterson and Mrs. A.N. Smyser.

A glass silver mounted berry boat, W.J. Mize.

Mr. and Mrs. Huber, soup set.

China berry set -- Leucretia Harbaugh, Josie Spitler, Mary Patterson, Agnes Bushman, Ella Lowe, Claude Bushman and Anna Lowe.

China tea set -- Sam Patterson, Frank Harbaugh, Harvey Scott.

Mr. and Mrs. Sam Smyser - Carving set.

Fine colored-glass water set -- Mr. and Mrs. Judge Meeker.

Set of engraved goblets -- John and Julia Moore.

Celery glass engraved -- Mrs. Johnna Woodworth.

Toothpick holder -- Master Ned Eden.

Set china fruit plates -- Mr. and Mrs. C.C. Clark.

Rustic flower ware and Turkish towel -- Misses Mollie and Emma Thunemann.

-182-

Hand painted flower vase -- Miss Robinson of Springfield.

Hanging silk pin cushion -- Miss Sallie Mayer.

Large double globe stand lamp -- J.J. Wilkerson.

Glass butter dish -- Alta Rose.

Double silver pickle stand -- Mrs. M.F. Kliver, Mollie Scott, Sadie Scott and Amanda and Hettie Stricklin.

Five china cups and saucers -- Blanche Eden.

Beautiful hand painting on white velvet -- Mrs. Julia Davis.

Pair linen towels -- Myria Bastion.

Dozen linen napkins -- Mr. and Mrs. J.H. Dunscomb.

Half dozen napkins -- Mrs. Mary Green.

Silver card receiver -- Ben Mayer.

Music stand -- Messrs. Ray Meeker and Charley Dunscomb.

Bridal bouquet -- Miss Cloyd.

Handwork Tidy -- Miss Ella Hoke.

Silver sugar shell -- Mr. and Mrs. M. Ansbacher.

Large Photo -- R.W. Pursell.

-183-

White Zephyr shawl -- Belle Eden.

The remark was heard on every side of "well matched and worthily mated."

Every thing connected with this wedding and feast went indeed "merry as a marriage bell." Never did a matrimonial bark set sail upon the ocean of life with fairer prospects of weather and sea, never in our city did a couple start with more earnest heart-f elt wishes for a prosperous voyage.

THE BOYS

The editor is at his desk this week and was, as he thought, running the paper again but the boys in the office, assisted by some of his friends, stole a march on him by inserting in THE PROGRESS a column notice of his marriage. He got hold of the article in time, however, to strike out a few flattering lines in reference to himself the compliments of which were highly appreciated, but his egotism was not quite strong enough to allow their insertion.

-184-

19.
MRS. I.J. MARTIN*

*The Lovington Reporter, Lovington, Ill., Friday, November 9, 1907.

Rose Eden, the second daughter of J.R. Eden and his deceased wife, was born in Sullivan, 2 Nov. 1858. She was married to I.J. Martin, son of J.N. Martin and wife, of Whitley township, 30 June 1886; died at their home in Sunnyside at midnight, 5 Nov. 1907 at age 49 years, and 3 days.

She ranked very highly in an educational line. She quit the public school at age 15 and entered the Bastion Seminary and spent a year in St. Mary's Academy.

Afterwards she went with the family to Washington City, her father being a member of Congress, and entered the Visitation Academy in Georgetown of the District of Columbia, where she graduated as valedictorian and won the gold medal of the class. She aft erwards re-entered the same institution and took a post graduate course; among her acquirements were French, music and German.

For a number of years she has taught with unlimited success music and French, only laying down the work about a year ago when her health failed.

She was a member of the Twenty Club, an advanced literary club of Sullivan that has for its object improvement and social culture. She was highly honored for her wide store of knowledge as well as her social attainment. She is the second member this clu b has lost by death.


-185-

She united with the Christian Church at age 18 and has led a faithful consistent Christian life. She was a dutiful wife and loving mother, and her loss to the family of husband and five children, 2 daughters and 3 sons, can never be estimated.

Olive, the eldest, is an excellent young woman teaching in the public school here. The other 4 are students in school. One little girl died several years ago at age of 4. She leaves beside the immediate family, her aged father, 3 sisters, Miss Emma Eden , Mrs. J.K Martin and Mrs. Paul Thackwell, and one brother, Walter Eden, besides a host of relatives and friends to mourn her loss.

The funeral services were conducted at the residence at Sunnyside Thursday at 2:30 p.m. conducted by Rev. J.G. McNutt, assisted by Rev. T.J. Wheat and Rev. W. Atkinson, after which interment was made in Greenhill cemetery.

-186-

20.
IVORY JOHN MARTIN

Mabel Martin George

My father was born November 7th, 1859, to Rachel Elvina and John Neely Martin. He was the 4th child but the others had died in infancy. Three times his parents were left childless, each child dying before the next was born. He was strong and healthy, a nd was given the name John Ivory. His parents and friends always called him "Ivory."

He grew up on a small farm ten miles south of Sullivan, Illinois. His father was a carpenter as well as a farmer, and had built the home in which he lived. It was a white frame cracker-box style house with a small stoop porch at the front entrance.

The main part of the house had two downstairs rooms, a living room and a bed room, joined by a hall with a stairway which led up to the half story bed rooms. There was a large room built on the back of the house which served as kitchen and dining room. At the south end of this room there was a large fire place, which was used for cooking and also provided heat for the house. The family spent most of their waking indoor hours in this room, especially in cold weather.

Large iron pots and gridirons were used to do the cooking. Baking was done in the iron pots which had lids and when covered with hot ashes served as ovens. When Father was ten years old, his mother agreed to the purchase of a cook stove. She had resist ed that because she did not think it was right for a woman's work to be made so easy.

Nine more children were born to his parents, but only three of them lived to maturity. They were a brother, Joel

-187-

Kester, a sister, Nancy Emmeline, and another sister, Sarah, who died in childbirth at the age of nineteen. She was married to a man named Bolten [Batson].

Father remembered a brother, Oliver, and a sister, Mary, [Susannah], who lived to be three years old. Little Mary had a crippled leg. Probably the reason that so many of his brothers and sisters were weakly was that his parents were first cousins. His mother was the daughter of Joel Figley Martin, who was a brother of his grandfather on his father's side.

Joel Figley Martin had a large family of children -- five sons and seven daughters. The work necessary to running the household was divided, and Rachel Elvina, my grandmother, was the weaver of the family. She wove all the cloth used for clothing, bed l inen and towels for the entire family. That was a full time job, and she did not develop other household skills. My grandfather used to tease her, saying that he had to teach her how to cook.

I do not know much about Father's childhood, but I am sure he had some happy times in spite of the hardships, griefs and losses suffered by his family. There were few books in his house, and he read each of them over and over. There was the Bible, of co urse, and I remember him mentioning a book about American history and one about geography.

He went to school in a one room school during the winter months when he was not needed on the farm. It was not a public school supported by taxes. His father paid a fee so that his children could attend school.

Father had an insatiable thirst for knowledge and did well in school. At the age of sixteen he started teaching

-188-

school, and with the first money he earned he bought a set of encyclopedias. One volume came each month until the whole set arrived, and each month he memorized everything in it before the next volume had come. He had the kind of mind that retained all he learned.

He never talked much about his childhood, but there were a few incidents I remember him mentioning. He was four [actually 5-1/2] years old when his family received the news of Lincoln's assassination. They were Democrats and had not agreed with many of Lincoln's policies, and had often criticized the President. When his father came in and said that Lincoln had been killed, a young cousin who was living with them said "Good." Her Aunt turned and slapped her in the face and said, "Don't you ever say anyt hing like that about anybody again."

And once he told me about sitting in front of the fireplace and watching apples sputter as they roasted on the hearth and parching corn. When the apples and corn were ready to eat, he and his brother and sisters had a feast before going up to their cold rooms and snuggling down under feather tucks.

He also told me that his father took corn to the mill to be ground into meal. He often went with him and felt proud to be allowed to stay in the wagon and hold the reins of the horses. There was a little store beside the mill, and he could see in the wi ndows that there was a glass jar which held red and white stick candy. He always hoped that his father would buy some of that candy, but he never did. Instead he bought raisins and crackers for them to munch on as they drove home. I asked, "Why didn't you ask your father to buy some candy?" He answered, "In my day children did not do that -- they took what was given to them and were thankful for it."

-189-

He also told me about his pet lamb and how grieved he was over its loss. I wrote that story and it is in my book, "Days to Remember." [Infra, at 206].

His friends and cousins liked to go hunting and sometimes he went with them, but he could never bring himself to shoot a rabbit or squirrel. The other boys thought it great sport, but he had no stomach for it. Once he threw a stone at a rabbit. It hit the animal in the head and killed it, and he was unhappy about that for days. He made up his mind that he would never again kill anything.

He never talked much about his activities as he was growing up or who his friends were -- probably because nobody asked. I wish now I had been more curious. But I remember hearing him say that his parents did not believe in dancing and he was not allowe d to attend dances. He said he would sometimes go and look in the window and watch the young people dance. And he spoke of a young cousin whose name was Mary Lane of whom he was quite fond. I believe he had dreams of marrying her, but she married someo ne else at an early age.

He spoke of an academy he attended and a teacher there for whom he had great admiration. I do not know how many terms he went there, but I believe it may have been summer school for he taught in winter. What he learned there inspired him to study and re ad about all subjects and things. All his life he read books, papers and periodicals so that he could know all about the world he lived in and the forces that controlled it.

He loved fine writing and delighted in poetry. Often in the evening he would read aloud from the works of great English bards and early American poets. He had a fine

-190-

speaking voice and the ability to bring out all the beauty and meaning of the poems by his rendition. His favorite English poets were Byron, Keats, Tennyson and Scott. I could never forget his dramatic reading from Scott's Marmion or Lady of t he Lake. And his readings from Tennyson, Whittier, Lowell and Poe were just as impressive.

My sister Olive and I loved those reading sessions, but I do not remember my brothers enjoying them. There was one poet who was a favorite of my father, whom Olive and I did not like. That was Walt Whitman. When Olive expressed her lack of appreciation for the works of Walt Whitman, Father answered with a quotation from one of Whitman's poems: "Go lull yourself with piano tunes, for I lull nobody and you will never understand me."

I am not sure when Father left the farm and came to Sullivan, but I believe it was at the age of 24 or 25 years [1883, at the age of 24]. He worked as an assistant to the County Clerk. And I do not know exactly when he got into the newspaper business, b ut it was in association with a Mr. Schuman, for whom he had great respect and admiration. He often spoke of him. This Schuman was probably the grandfather of Charles Schuman.

Father must have met my mother, Rose Eden, soon after coming to Sullivan, for he was 26 years old when they were married, June 30th, 1886. She was a year older than he. I have letters which he wrote to her during their courtship. It was not proper for a young man to call on a young lady every day, even if they were engaged. They lived in the same town but he wrote to her every day. Sometimes he sent his letter by a messenger who waited for a reply, and other times he put his letter in her father's ma il box.

-191-

In addition to his publishing a weekly newspaper, called the Sullivan Progress, he was an abstractor. It was sometimes said that he had to have his abstract business to support his newspaper. He was not a particularly good business man and never accumulated much wealth, but he always provided for his family by working long hours at a profession he enjoyed.

He and Mother started housekeeping in a rather large house in the north part of town. That house is still standing and in good condition. It is located a few blocks south of the high school building. Their first two children, Olive and John Eden, were born there. In 1889 he built a six room house in the addition called Sunnyside. His other four children were born there. One of these, a girl named Elvina, died of diphtheria at the age of 4 years and 4 days. She died on Christmas day 1897. The other children were Joel Neely, born in '91, Robert Walter, in '95, and myself, Mabel, in '99. The girls were not given double names. Their parents thought that they could take Martin for their middle names when they married. Olive never married so she took Mother's maiden name and always signed herself Olive Eden Martin.

Father's marriage was a happy one. He and Mother were congenial, both kind and loving, and they had the same values and interests. There was never any dissension or quarreling in their home. The only time I remember when Mother showed any displeasure w ith Father's action was when he bought a gramophone.

She had expressed her disapproval of the purchase, saying that they could not afford the expense and she did not like canned music. My brothers wanted it and urged Father to buy it. The evening he brought it home, Mother went to her room and refused to come out and listen to the records.

-192-

There were twenty of them. Two were operatic numbers which were chosen in the hope of pleasing Mother, who was a fine musician; and two were religious songs, which Father thought she might enjoy. There were a number of band records, and songs of the day along with musical numbers from Gilbert & Sullivan and comedy routines. Four of the records were speeches by William Jennings Bryan, and they showed why Father wanted the machine. At that time he was a great admirer of Bryan. That was in 1906, which w as not a presidential election year, but Father took his machine to Democratic meetings during the Congressional campaign and played the speeches of W.J. Bryan.

The other records were played and enjoyed by all of us children, especially me, but I do not remember my mother ever listening to them. She may have liked to hear the operatic numbers. They were the quartet from Rigoletto and the sextet from Lucia, but she gave no sign of it. I played them over and over, and they were my first taste of opera.

We lived in four different houses during my childhood. The house Father built became too small for a family of seven, and we moved to a larger house a few blocks east in the summer of 1905. We lived there only one winter. Grandfather Eden became seriou sly ill, and we moved into his house so that Mother could help Aunt Emma take care of him.

We were there through the summer and in September we moved into a newly built stone house, again in Sunnyside. It had two stories with four rooms downstairs and five bedrooms upstairs. Mother's health had started to fail, and she lived only two months i n that house.

In the spring after her death, two more rooms were built on the house which Father had built years before, and we

-193-

moved back into it. After Grandfather Eden's death, we moved into the Eden house, and Father lived there until he was 91 years old.

Mother's death in 1907 was a terrible blow to all of us. Father felt lost without her, and he faced a big responsibility in looking after his family. Olive and Eden were through high school and Olive had a year of college. She did not go back the secon d year because of Mother's illness. She took a job in the Sullivan schools.

Father devoted himself to his family and his business. No one ever had a better father, but I know that he never got over that feeling of bereavement and loneliness. He was a widower at 48, and a handsome and attractive man. People expected him to marr y again, and there were a number of widows and spinsters who would have liked to have his attention, but he showed no interest in any of them. That did not keep the gossips from linking his name with eligible women. He could hardly tip his hat to a lady without someone seeing a romance. He would say, "Why can't they leave a widower alone."

Mother was buried on November 7th, which was Father's birthday. Not until he was a very old man would he let us celebrate his birthday. He said, "November 7th means only one thing to me." Until he was past seventy he walked to the cemetery every Sunday, weather permitting, to visit Mother's grave. I often went with him until I went away to school. We would also go to the Eden lot where my sister Elvina was buried. There was some talk of having Elvina's casket moved to the Martin lot so that she would be beside Mother, but it was decided that it was best to leave her on Grandfather's lot.

-194-

He told of one time when he walked clear to the back of the cemetery and sat under a tree to rest. He saw a snake coiled with its head up looking at him. It was a blue racer and he knew that if he moved it would come at him, so he sat quite still until the snake left. He was a candidate for Congress at the time, and he thought of what a spectacle he would have made, running toward town with a snake after him.

Father was always keenly interested in politics and was the Democratic candidate for Congress in 1910. That was when the family group picture was taken. I was eleven, Bob fifteen, Neely nineteen, Eden twenty one, and Olive twenty three. The Congression al district was strongly Republican, and Father lost the election. He did well in Moultrie County, but was not well known in the rest of the district and did little campaigning.

Although Father grew up in a very religious family, he was not a church goer. He was sometimes called an atheist by his political enemies, but he did not fit in that category. He once said, "A man who says there is no God is a fool. He can't possibly k now there is not a God -- or if there is." He did not enter into any religious controversy, and I never heard him really discuss the subject until I was forty years old, and then he had to be pushed into it.

I once said to him "Father, you do not profess to be a Christian, but you live more like one than anyone I know. You really live according to the teachings of Jesus." He answered, "That is because he was right about how to live." He was a student of the Bible and revered it as he did all great literature, but he did not accept it as divine word.

In 1905 there was a big revival meeting in Sullivan. All the churches went together and brought an evangelist from

-195-

Chicago who conducted two weeks of meetings in the armory. The evangelist (I think his name was Lockhart) had a magnetic personality and was a good speaker. He was also an excellent showman. At the end of each performance, the members of the congregati on were urged to come forward and profess their faith in the Lord. They could choose whether they wanted to join the Christian, Methodist or Presbyterian church.

Mother and Olive were already members of the Christian Church, and I was too young to make a decision, but my brothers were urged to join church. Mother wanted them to become members of the Christian Church, but they said that Papa was not a church membe r, and he was the best and wisest man they knew, so they saw no reason for them to join. Mother began working on Father, and when he saw how important it was to her, he said, "If you think I am setting a bad example to my children by not joining church, I will join -- but not the Christian Church. I will not be baptized. I'll join the Methodists, they only sprinkle."

So he went through the proper rituals, and all the rest of his life he gave financial support to the Methodist Church, but he did not attend its services. My three brothers went forward one evening at the revival meeting and said they wanted to join the Christian Church, but Bob did not show up for the baptism service.

Before I leave the subject of religion, I want to write something about the church Father attended while he was growing Up. His father and mother were devout hardshell predestinarian Baptists. Their church was situated in a wooded area a mile or so west of where they lived. It was a plain frame one-room building, and as I remember it had a weather beaten appearance. I always think of it when I hear, the little brown church in the wildwood." It had two

-196-

front doors. The men entered by the north door, and the women by the south door. And they sat on opposite sides of the aisle.

The pews were wooden benches with backs to them, and they were the only furnishings in the room. Members brought their own hymnals to church, and they had the words to the songs but not the music.

The church had no regular minister and had their meetings once a month. Preachers would come in from other areas -- usually there would be two, three or even four of them riding from different directions. I visited my grandfather in the summer and atten ded these meetings many times, and I believe they were conducted in much the same way when Father was a child.

The meetings lasted for hours, for each preacher had to give a sermon. The talks were not prepared ahead of time, and had no main theme. When a hardshell Baptist preacher got up to speak, the Lord put the words in his mouth. These sermons were delivere d in a high monotonous tone with no inflection except a drop at intervals, so that the speaker could catch his breath. They consisted mostly of quotations from the scriptures or from the creed of the church.

The hymns were never announced. Some one in the congregation would start singing and the others would join in. Usually it was my father's Aunt Lide(?) who started the song, and often she pitched it too high for others, and someone would find a more comfo rtable key, which did not make for harmony.

When the meeting was over, the entire congregation went to Grandma's for dinner. Grandma and Dore, her niece, had spent Saturday cooking and baking, and there was

-197-

a feast for all. It may have been that others brought food, but I did not know of it.

The table in the large kitchen was lengthened and seated a goodly number, but there was a need for it to be set several times to accommodate all. The children had to wait until the last table, and it would be late in the day before they could eat. They played in the big front yard until they were called in. Father once told of a time when he and his playmates became so hungry that they sent a boy to the house to look in and see if the adults were almost through. He came back and said, "We'll never get to eat. They've started praying again."

I don't know how long Father continued to go to that church, but I doubt if he ever attended sermons there after he left home. But his brother, J.K. Martin, kept his ties with the church, and an old-time Baptist minister preached at his funeral.

In his later years Father became interested in the Unitarian religion. He listened to a radio broadcast from Chicago on Sunday morning, and was much impressed by the sermons of Dr. Preston Bradley. That was sixty years ago when I and my family were livi ng with him, and he and I listened to those programs together. I made up my mind that if I were ever in a town where there was a Unitarian church, I would attend. That did not happen until we moved to St. Paul. I attended the Unitarian Church there for twenty-three years, and I often thought that Father would have liked their services.

Father had few hobbies and was never a joiner. He belonged to no lodge or organization of any kind, but he took great interest in community affairs. He was on the school board and President of the Library Board for many

-198-

years. He also supported all projects which he believed beneficial to the town, and was especially active in the campaign for municipal ownership of the light plant.

Reading was his main pastime, and his only personal extravagance was buying books and periodicals. He was interested in all subjects, but did not waste time on modern fiction. Although he loved poetry, he had no ear for melody or harmony, and did not- e njoy music. My brother Eden had a beautiful baritone voice, and sometimes in family concerts, Father would ask Eden to sing two songs, "Drink to me only with thine eyes," and "Sing me to Sleep"; but it was the lyrics that he enjoyed.

He loved the theater and attended every dramatic performance, and -- believe it or not -- we did have good dramatic companies come to Sullivan when I was a child. The Titus Opera House was an unusual center of culture for such a small town, and there wer e excellent plays given there. And I heard my first opera there -- a performance of Faust. It was a great loss to the community when the opera house burned down.

Father made trips to Chicago to see good plays and visit museums. For my sixteenth birthday, he and Olive took me to Chicago and we saw four plays performed by the greatest Shakespearean actors of that time, Sothern(?) and Marlowe. That was the thrill o f my young life.

In 1897 O.B. Lane, County Superintendent of Schools, told Father of a bright 14-year old girl, an orphan, who lived with a farm family and went to a country school. She wanted to go to High School, but the family did not think that necessary. She needed a home. Father went to the school to see her, was favorably impressed, and said he would take her. Her name was Ella Condon. She was told to bring

-199-

clothes to school the next day. She said she would not do that. She did not want to let her folks know she was leaving.

So she came to our house with nothing, and it was a lucky thing for all of us. She lived with us until she married, and to the end of her life she was a dear member of our family. She was a great help to Mother, and Mother did [things] for her. She mad e her clothes, saw that she had all she needed, gave her good counsel and love. She helped her entertain her friends so that she would have a good social life, and we all loved Ella dearly.

Once someone said to Father, "Ella was surely lucky to have such a good home." Father replied, "I don't think of that. I'm too busy thinking of how lucky we are to have her."

Perhaps I should write something about Clara, who was our housekeeper for years. She was a quiet person and came from the southern part of the state. She had little education, but a lot of common sense. She belonged to the Harshmanite group, and went t here on Sunday and to the Wednesday night meetings. She was a good worker and took care of the house, and did the cooking for a family of seven. She came to us before Mother died, and remained until I was fifteen. She was very good to me after Mother d ied and looked after me, and I often went with her to Wednesday night meetings. But as time went by, she got a little sloppy with her work, tried to boss everyone, and resented taking orders from Olive, who paid her salary. I don't know what happened be tween her and Olive, but one day Olive fired her. She went to live with a Harshmanite family. But she felt she had been mistreated.

She called Father and asked him to come to see her. She said she had lived in his home for seven years and felt

-200-

that her reputation had been harmed. She even hinted that he should marry her.

Father had never paid any special attention to her. I doubt if he had ever discussed anything more than the grocery list with her. But he felt sorry for her and said he would try to get Olive to reconsider. But Olive said no -- and if he brought her ba ck, she and the boys would leave and take me with them. That was the end of that, for the house belonged to us children, and Father could hardly drive us out.

After that we had a series of housekeepers -- some pretty good and some that were impossible. We got by, but sometimes I missed Clara. We often had additions to our family. Father took anyone who needed a home. My Mother's sister Emma became ill, and she and her nurse moved in and stayed for a year. Emma's daughter stayed with us two years and went to High School. My Grandfather Martin lived with us the last three years of his life.

When Uncle Joe's health failed, he went to California for a while where Aunt Belle was with her daughter, Blanche, who had T.B. Uncle Joe's health got better and he came back to Sullivan, bringing Kenneth and Grace with him. And they lived with us for so me time. So we always had a house full of people.

I will get back to Father's story. Children of cousins often inherit the weaknesses of both sides of the family and are defective or too weak to survive. But sometimes it works the other way, and such was the case with Father. He inherited an overdose of all the strengths of the family. Physically, mentally, emotionally and morally, he was near perfection.

-201-

He was six feet tall, well built and handsome. He had dark eyes and brown hair. As a young man, he wore a mustache, but by the time he was married he had a full black beard. He wore that until he was in his early forties. At the first grey hairs, he s haved it off.

He often had a stern expression, but as soon as someone spoke to him, his eyes brightened and a smile lit up his face, showing the dimple on his left cheek.

I have already written about his mental ability, but I want to mention his progressive ideas. He was for women's suffrage from the beginning of the movement. Mr. Peadro, a rather pompous gentleman who lived next door, was against women voting. He said women were not capable of making decisions and should stay at home and let men run the country. He made women sound as though they were stupid. Father said, "Mr. Peadro, I guess I have been more lucky than you in the kind of women I have known." Father studied Darwin's books and accepted the theory of evolution, and he read Freud and believed some of his theories. So he was ahead of most people in his understanding of life.

Father went to his office and took care of his abstract business until he was past eighty. He became a movie fan. Every evening he would have supper at the Corner and go to the movies. That way he would see every picture twice. He said he got the plot the first time, and the second time he looked for fine points in the acting.

One night when he was walking home he was almost across Harrison Street when he was struck by a car. He was seriously injured and taken to Decatur to a hospital. He was there several weeks. The old man who hit him was new in town, and Father did not kn ow him [a man named Gwinn]. He asked if it would be all right for him to go see Father.

-202-

When he went in to Father's room and introduced himself, Father said, "The last time I met you, I didn't see you."

When Father was struck down, his teeth flew out and were crushed. The dentist made him some new ones and sent them to him. Later he came over to see how Father liked them. Father said, "Why, they are fine. I never saw a finer set of teeth. All they n eed is to find a mouth that will fit them."

The day they took the cast off his leg, a nurse came in and gave him therapy for the leg. She was in the wrong room, and the treatment was torture. It injured his foot and started a blood clot through his circulation. The clot stopped in his brain, and he was paralyzed on one side and could not speak.

We took him back to Sullivan and he stayed with Mrs. Clevenger, who at that time lived across the street from his house. She nursed him back to health. The blood clot in his brain dissolved after several weeks, and he was himself again. But the doctor said that his foot was so badly injured, he would never walk again. He was determined to walk. At first he used two canes and hobbled around the house. Then he went out on the porch. One day I looked out and he had gone down the steps and was walking up and down the front wall A rather nosey but well meaning neighbor called and said, "Mabel don't you know you shouldn't let your father walk with two canes." I said, "I don't let my father do anything -- he makes his own decisions." She said, "He'll fall and break his hip." And I answered, "Well, it is his hip."

He did not fall, and in time he walked with one cane, and could walk freely around the house. But he did not go back to his office. He seemed happy and content. He spent

-203-

his time reading and writing, and talking to his many visitors, and had several more years of enjoyment.

Soon after Christmas the year he was 91, he suffered a stroke. We could not take care of him, and he went to Mrs. Clevenger's nursing home on Jackson Street. At first he seemed to improve. Sometimes he was lucid, but as time went by he became confused. Toward the end of his life, he seemed to be in a coma, but sometimes would wake up and speak. Once he said, "I have only one regret." Bob said, "What is that, Father?" He answered, "I never really learned anything about music."

I sat beside him in his last illness. I have written rhymes, jingles, and songs all my life, but sometimes when I am deeply moved, I write serious poetry. This was such a time, and I wrote this poem about Father:

LAST VIGIL

I sit beside you now,
Hoping that you will feel my presence and be comforted
by my love,
But knowing that I will receive from you more strength
and inspiration than I can possibly give.

Great mind, now cloudy and confused,
You were a storehouse of learning,
A keen instrument of reason and deduction,
Providing logic and unusual wisdom,
Memories of almost a hundred years are
mixed and jumbled and without connection,
But still I see you striving for contacts --
seeking for sense and order, and communication
with a fading world.

-204-

Dark expressive eyes, dimmed and dulled by age,
You have seen much and gloried in all things good and beautiful.
The lovely works of nature and man made art and sculpture,
Engineering feats and architecture all gladdened your spirit.

Such things are lost to you,
But still you brighten at the red rose
beside your bed, and follow the ray of
sunlight falling from between drawn curtains,
Seeking and finding beauty to the end.

Impressive personality,
Happily balanced in warmth and reserve,
Outspoken challenger of injustice,
Devoted to high principles, personal and public,
With unshaken faith in people and Democracy,
With reverence for life and the Supreme source of life,
A scientist-mystic and poetic paradox,
Your spark is wrapped and smothered,
Dormant and all but extinguished.

But as long as there is breath and pulse to give faint nourishment,
The world's store of all the things you love and honor grows and expands,
And generations to come will unknowingly feel the touch and influence of your mind and heart.

And to the end of time, the world will be a better place
Because you have lived in it.
This, your immortality.

-205-

BLACK LAMB*

*This story by Mabel Martin appeared as a chapter in her little booklet, Days to Remember, Stories of the Turn of the Century, published in 1981. It is in the form of a story told by I.J. Martin to his grandchildren.

The best pet I ever had was a black lamb. The little fellow's mama died soon after he was born. Pa said that Sister and I could have him if we would take care of him. We brought him in to the shed just off the kitchen, and no lamb ever had better care than he did.

Ma washed out a liniment bottle and made a rag nipple for it, so we could feed Blacky warm milk. My Aunt told Ma she'd never get that bottle clean enough that it wouldn't taste and smell like liniment, but Ma said that didn't matter. Blacky wouldn't car e how it smelled and if he got a little liniment in his milk, it would keep him from having a stomach ache.

Well, the bottle worked all right, and if Blacky ever tasted the liniment, he made no complaint. He was always hungry, and Sister and I spent much of our time feeding him, taking care of him, and playing with him. We couldn't be with him all the time, o f course. We had our chores to do. I helped Pa in the barn, keeping it clean, and caring for the animals. I hoed corn and pulled weeds from the garden, and there was always wood to chop and bring in for the cook stove and the fireplace.

Sister helped Ma in the house and fed the chickens and gathered eggs. She churned butter, too, and was learning to cook and sew. Ma said no daughter of hers was going to


-206-

grow up not knowing how to be a good housewife. Why, Sister already could bake biscuits that tasted mighty good especially with honey on them.

When Blacky got a little older, he followed us all around the place like a dog, and if he got lost when we were running around or playing hide and seek, he would stand and bleat so piteously that Sister would run to him quickly and put her arms around him to give him comfort.

Sheep aren't supposed to be very smart, but Blacky didn't seem to know he was a sheep. He thought he was one of us. When we talked to him, he would look into our faces and cock his head to one side as though he were listening and understanding every wor d we said. He learned to come when we called and go back when we told him, and he joined in our play every way he could. When we sat down to rest, he came close and nuzzled us to show his affection.

Sometimes Ma complained about him being always underfoot, but she really liked him, too. She let him come in the house, now and then, and he learned how to behave quite properly as a member of the household.

One day when Sister had gone to visit our aunt, I was sitting on the front steps with Blacky close beside me. I saw a stranger coming up the hill. I called Ma and when the man reached us, Ma said, "howdy, what can we do for you?"

He said his name was Turner and he had just moved on to the Hostetler place. He added that he heard we had a cow for sale. "Well," Ma said, "You'll have to talk to my husband about that. He's down on the south forty, grubbing -- he wants to clear that land so he can plant winter wheat."

-207-

Then she told me to go with Mr. Turner and show him where Pa was working. Of course, Blacky wanted to go, too, but I told him to stay there. Mr. Turner looked at Blacky and said, "That's a mighty cute lamb," and then turning to Ma, he asked, "Would you sell him to me? I'd like to take him home to my little girl."

Ma laughed, "There are times when he's such a nuisance that I'd be glad to be rid of him, but he belongs to the children and I'm sure there isn't enough money in the county to buy him."

Mr. Turner and I went down to the south forty and he and Pa talked a while about the cow. I knew that Pa was anxious to make the sale. I heard him tell Ma he had to get his hands on some cash money to pay taxes. He was asking a bigger price than Mr. Tu rner wanted to pay, and it looked as though they weren't going to make a deal. Mr. Turner thought a while, and then said, "Mr. Martin, I'll meet your price if you will throw in that black lamb I saw up at the house."

Pa said, "Oh, I couldn't do that. My wife thinks a sight of that lamb and she wouldn't want me to sell it."

"That's funny," said Mr. Turner, "Your wife just told me that the lamb was a nuisance and she'd like to be rid of it." Pa looked surprised, "Well, if that's the case, take the lamb if you want it."

We walked to the barn where Mr. Turner looked the cow over and said he would take her. He paid Pa the money and Pa told me, "Go get the lamb, Son."

As I walked toward the house, Blacky came to meet me, and I felt like a traitor when I took him to the barn and

-208-

turned him over to Mr. Turner. Then I ran to the house and climbed the ladder to my room in the attic, so no one could see me cry. I wondered how Sister would take it when she got home and found Blacky gone. I knew she would be heart-broken, but at lea st she wouldn't have to hide her tears. It was all right for girls to cry.

I've thought about why I didn't tell Pa that Mr. Turner was wrong about Mama. It's hard to explain, but when I was a boy, the old saying that children were to be seen and not heard was taken seriously. No well-brought-up child would dispute the word of a grown person, especially not a man.

When Pa came to the house, I heard him telling Ma about the deal and when she heard that he had let Mr. Turner take Blacky, she shouted out, "John Neely Martin, how could you do such a thing? Don't you know that Blacky was part of the family?"

Pa was taken aback and tried to calm her by saying, "Why Rachel, you said yourself that the lamb was a nuisance and that you would be glad to be rid of him."

"I said no such thing. I may have said that Blacky was sometimes a nuisance, but I made it clear to Mr. Turner that he was not for sale at any price. Now you hitch up the team and go right over to the Hostetler place and give that man his money and brin g the cow and Blacky home. We don't need money so bad that we have to do business with liars."

My spirits lifted until I heard Pa say, "Now Rachel, I can't do that. A deal's a deal, and besides, I don't want to start off by having trouble with a new neighbor."

Ma came back with, "What about our boy and girl? They loved that lamb and it isn't right for them to have to

-209-

give it up. They're good children and they don't have many pleasures. I don't like to see them hurt. Besides, that lamb belonged to them. You gave it to them yourself."

"I know," Pa said, "and I'm sorry. I should have thought of that. But they'll get over it and I'll give them the next lamb that is born, and they can make a pet of it just as they did with Blacky."

I buried my head in the pillow and sobbed my disappointment. I felt as though I never wanted to see another lamb and I knew that no pet could ever take the place of Blacky. It hurt to lose my pet, but I understood how Pa felt. He was sorry he hadn't thought about the lamb belonging to Sister and me, and he didn't like it that Mr. Turner had lied to him. Well, maybe he hadn't exactly lied, -- Ma had said that there were tim es when she'd like to be rid of Blacky, but he certainly had misrepresented. Pa probably didn't realize how much Blacky meant to us. He worked hard in the fields every day except Sunday, from sun-up until dark, and when he got in from doing the evening chores, he was so tired that he just ate his supper and went to bed. So he hadn't seen a lot of Blacky. When Mr. Turner said Ma wanted to be rid of him, he thought it must be all right with everyone. He usually let Ma run the house and make the decisio ns about us children.

He knew he had been mistaken, but he had sold the cow and the lamb, and taken Mr. Turner's money, and he couldn't go back on that. And as he said, he didn't want to have trouble with a neighbor.

Times were different then. Neighbors had to stand together and help each other. It was important that they be

-210-

on good terms. I was old enough to understand that things were better that way. Pa never had any more business deals with Mr. Turner, but he went over and helped him at haying time, and Ma took care of Mrs. Turner when her baby was born. The next winte r when Sister had pneumonia and almost died, Mrs. Turner sat up with her three nights, putting hot poultices on her chest. She was a fine nurse and Ma said she saved Sister's life.

It was harder for Sister to get over the loss of her pet, and she grieved for Blacky until Pa gave her a new-born white lamb to care for. She named him Snowball, and he was her constant companion. I was glad to see her happy again, but Snowball and I ne ver became real friends.

-211-

21.
NOTES ON THE HISTORY
OF MOULTRIE COUNTY

I.J. MARTIN

I have been writing a few notes on the people who were pioneers in the settlement of Moultrie County.* My memory goes back to a time about 40 years after the date of the first arrivals, and I have talked with some of them. I have known personally all of our county clerks and all of the judges but the first. The first circuit clerk had moved away, and the second had died before I became aware of things. I have had other sources of information, and I have a good memory. So I think I may be able to prod uce something that will be interesting and perhaps important.

*I.J. Martin's papers contained several writings relating to the early history of Moultrie County. Two of these were printed in the Sullivan Herald about 1926 under the title, "The First Permanent White Settlement in Whitley Townsh ip." The other papers are handwritten notes, evidently written about 1950 when I.J. was 90 years old. These several papers have been edited into this single set of "Notes".

Illinois had been a state of the Federal Union eight years before any permanent white settlement was made in what is now Moultrie County. The first permanent settlement was made in the year 1826, just a hundred years ago, by John Whitley and his family.< P> There had doubtless been temporary settlements of roving hunters and adventurers before that time. Fifty years ago there could still be seen the remains of the hearth and stick chimney and foundation logs of a cabin in section five,


-212-
southeast of the Waggoner church. The oldest inhabitant of that day could not remember the cabin, and it may have been a hundred years old at that time -- its occupants gone and forgotten before the Whitley's came.

The river on the north had been explored and named long before. The explorers were not settlers, although at the mouth of the river at its junction with the Father of Waters, the French had made a settlement about 1688, in the same century as the Jamesto wn and Plymouth settlements, and only a few years after Penn and the Quakers founded the City of Brotherly Love.

Both the French and English adopted the Indian name for our river, but the weird French spelling makes the name of the two ends of the river look like two entirely different words. The Indians called the river "Kaw-Kaw" and anyone who has ever heard the call of the crow knows what the Indian word means, and any one who can remember the flocks of black-feathered birds that used to infest the groves knows why the name was given to the river. The English shortened the name to "O Kaw", while the French from the beginning called the river Kawkawkiah, and you know how they spelled it and how wretchedly some of our school teachers pronounce it.

The same muddling occurred with the name of the little river that rises a few miles southeast of us. Our teachers fifty years ago told us to call it Embarrass, but our fathers who knew the river gave us the correct name -- "Ahmberrawh." One wonders why t he map-makers do not use English instead of French spelling for the beautiful Indian names scattered over our state -- names imitated from bird songs, rather than the guttural growls of our ancestors of northern Europe. Don't let the teachers teach our c hildren to say "Cass-cass-ki." The English rendering of

-213-
Okaw is near enough to the Indian name, but if the French name is used, pronounce it as the French did -- "Kaw-Kaw-Kiah."

Although our settlers did not get here early enough to name the river, they gave names to our smaller streams. The two head branches and the main channel were named Whitley Creek, and the second family to arrive gave their name to Waggoner Branch, which flows into Whitley Creek near its junction with the Okaw. The other two branches of Whitley Creek were named for the kind of trees that clustered along the banks, although the Crabapple and Linn (or Linden) trees have perhaps all disappeared. Fifty year s ago anyone acquainted with these streams would have known why they were so named.

The Whitley family made the first permanent settlement in what is now Moultrie County at the east end of Whitley Township, at a point where the timber extended into the prairie. This point was called from that time Whitley's Point. This settlement was m ade in the year 1826. The family consisted of John Whitley, his wife, and their six sons -- John, Sharp, Mills, Randall, William, and Josiah -- and their families. At the time of their settlement, all of John Whitley's sons were married except Josiah, a nd at least one daughter had a husband, Samuel Lindley, who was a member of the little settlement. They settled along or near the Old Whitley Road that still runs in a few places on the same line upon which it did one hundred or more years ago. Uncle Gi lbert Waggoner once said, "It was there when I came and must have been there before the Whitleys." Who laid it out and first traveled it is a pre-historic mystery.

The government was not selling land here then, and so the Whitleys just settled. What was the use of buying land, anyway, when one had the whole out-of-doors. The first land

-214-
patents were issued in 1830, and John Whitley, Sr., Sharp, and William Whitley each entered the eighty acre tracts upon which they had settled. Mills Whitley sold his homestead rights to Samuel M. Smysor, who took out a patent in 1831. I believe Mack Ga rrett now owns the Mills Whitley eighty acres. I have not been able to find any other land entries of the Whitley family nor of Samuel Lindley. The most important thing, perhaps, that Lindley did was to go down to what is now known as the Whitfield farm with his ox teams and break out some prairie land for the Waggoners.

The Whitleys have not received as much attention as they have deserved, mainly because the family moved away after a few years' residence. However, they were real men, energetic and enterprising, even if they were not impressed with the value of the land . When they came here they were still in Fayette County, but their settlement was included in the new county of Shelby, organized in January 1827. At the first election, John Whitley was elected one of the three commissioners to manage the affairs of th e new county. His son, Mills Whitley, was a member of the first grand jury and Sharp Whitley was on the first petit jury.

John Whitley erected the first mill -- a horse power concern -- we have not been told how the power was applied to turn the burrs, but he made it go.

Isaac Waggoner and his sons and daughters with their families came from North Carolina in March 1828 and formed a larger community than that of the Whitleys. They settled a few miles west of Whitley's Point, and the little creek near their settlement is still known as Waggoner branch. It flows into Whitley Creek near its junction with the river which was known as the Okaw. The Waggoners' big time is coming at their centennial reunion at Wyman

-215-
Park in Sullivan sometime in 1929. The Waggoners will gather from all parts of the continent. Their slogan is "once a Waggoner, always a Waggoner." No matter if a daughter changes her name, her children will all be Waggoners. The other name simply does n't count.

The Whitley settlement is considered permanent because it remained after others came, but the Waggoner families were in another sense the first permanent settlers; and they share with the Bones, who came to Marrowbone Creek a little later in the same year , the honor of being the oldest continuous settlers in Moultrie County.

The Waggoners were a more quiet folk, and it is not surprising to learn that they did not quite approve of the sporting proclivities of the Whitleys. It was, perhaps, John Whitley's reputation as a horseman and his race horses and hunting hounds that sec ured his election as County Commissioner. After the Waggoners came, it was getting a little crowded, as they, like the Whitleys, had some half-dozen families. So many people would frighten the deer and make other game more shy, if not less plentiful. P erhaps other things were irritating. Anyway, there was trouble and there is a tradition that some of the Whitleys and their friends made a menacing visit to the Waggoner settlement. There was no fighting, but they separated without reaching an amicable agreement. I have heard Uncle Gilbert Waggoner say, "The Whitleys were a rough set -- a bad lot." Their ways of life were different, and the two families didn't understand each other. The Whitleys, doubtless, were brave, strong, active and restless. So me of them went to Missouri and others to Texas , where they probably fought for the independence of the Lone Star. But John Whitley, Sr., was getting along in years, and he made a short move up the river into Coles County, where he passed the remainder of his life. They were "rough and ready", but I believe Uncle

-216-
Gilbert was too severe in pronouncing them "a bad lot." They were the typical pioneers -- the advance guard of civilization, and their kind made the frontiers safer for those who came later.

Judge W.G. Cochran has kindly furnished us with a copy of the Lovington Reporter of January 5, 1912, in which is an article contributed by him on the early history of Moultrie County. Judge Cochran's family settled near Lovington in 1849. He was then old enough to learn and remember the events of that day, and he also learned by tradition and reading much of our earlier history.

He called attention to the fact that after the organization of the Northwest Territory by Congress, the word "Illinois" was dropped from the legal designation of the territory, and was not restored until 1809 when the Indiana territory was divided and the name Illinois given to the domain now included in our state. By the way, this name also shows the confusion of combining French spelling and English pronunciation. It is generally pronounced in a way to suggest the clatter of a worn out car on a rough road (an ill noise). The University people have tried to get back to the old name by writing it Illini and accenting the second syllable when an accent on the first would be nearer the Indian name. The French got the name from the Indians and called it Eelnwahy, and of course spelled it Illinois. Then the English, our ancestors, came along and mispronounced it.

Judge Cochran's article shows that he had a broad and accurate understanding of the early history of our county. He recites the organization of the county, location of the county seat, and other items of interest. However, we are under great obligation to him for a copy of a letter written by Mrs. Martha Scott, a daughter of Amos Waggoner and wife of Andrew Scott. Her branch of the family has been

-217-
prominent in the affairs of the County. Her father was for awhile on the Board of County Commissioners. Her husband held positions of honor and was the contractor who built our first court house. Her oldest brother John was nominated for Circuit Clerk in 1852, but was defeated by the friends of the old circuit clerk who bolted because their favorite was not renominated. (As we are talking now of a great pioneer woman and her family, we are hurriedly glancing a little ahead.) Another of her brothers, Jo seph H. Waggoner, was elected Circuit Clerk twelve years later and served sixteen years. A son, Andrew E.D. Scott, was County Treasurer ten years, and another son, Louis K Scott, served eight years as County Clerk, and had been renominated for another te rm but died before the election.

Mrs. Scott was five years old when her family moved to a point near the Whitley settlement in the spring of 1828. We select the following portions of her letter:

"I suppose you know our grandfather's name was Isaac Waggoner and grandmother's name, before she married, was Emsey Holyfield. I think I can name every one who was along: Grandfather and Grandmother, Uncle George and Aunt Patsy*, and their four children, Alvin, Robert, Celia and Sally. Our father, Amos Waggoner and Narcissa, his wife, and their three children, Martha Jay, Isaac Vestal and James Monroe. Then Uncle Noah Webb and his wife Polly, and their two little girls, Synthia and Jemima. Uncle Gilbe rt and Aunt Patsy, they had not been long married, were both young. Aunt Patsy was about 14 years of age, I think

*I.J. Martin wrote in the margin of his transcript of this letter that Mrs. Scott had erred as to the name of George's wife.

-218-
-- a slim bit of a girl. Uncle Elisha had no family and Aunt Emsey, a girl sixteen or perhaps not so old as that.

"We had one large crooked bed wagon, either four or six horses, I do not know which. I think Father and Uncle Elisha did most of the driving of the big wagon. They had a saddle on one of the horses that was hitched to the wagon and rode it and drove the others. Grandfather had a carry-all for him and Grandmother to ride in; sometimes they would take some of the children to ride with them. This was the only wagon there was in the company, but there were some extra horses.

"I remember Uncle Gilbert had a beautiful bay horse and he and Aunt Patsy rode. Father had one mare along. Mother would ride it sometimes. I do not remember whether there were any other horses along. I do know there was a good deal of walking done.

"We did not meet many travelers, no railroads then, and but few other good roads. Once in a while we would meet the stage coach with a few people in it. They traveled in a hurry and sounded their bugle in time for us to give them the road.

"One afternoon Father and I were walking some distance behind when two men came up with us who had been out shooting. One had a duck and some squirrels and he handed them to me saying, 'Here, sis, I will give these to you.' I would not take them until Fa ther told me to. I was proud of my game. When we came up with the wagons they had stopped to camp for the night. We had duck and squirrels cooked for supper.

"We crossed the Ohio in a horse ferry boat, crossed over from Kentucky into Illinois, some distance above Mt.

-219-
Vernon, Illinois* -- seems to me like they called it Ford's crossing. The river was about a mile wide. (Probably an overflow, or a child's exaggeration.) I was afraid, and I remember Grandmother was crying while in the boat.

*I.J. Martin added a marginal note: "Mrs. Scott has the name of the wrong town, as Mt. Vernon, Illinois, is not near the Ohio River."

"Pretty soon after we landed in Illinois, Grandfather was taken sick with bilious fever and got so bad we had to stop two or three weeks at Hogs Prairie.

"Finally we landed on Whitley Creek, Shelby County, Illinois, I think about the last of April 1828. There were few people there at that time. The Whitleys were there, and a few others. The country was wild, a few little cabins with two or three acres i n cultivation, land was not in market yet.

"We thought the prairies never would be settled. Grandfather lived in a little cabin on the place where Mr. Little lived afterwards. The first year after that he settled across the branch southeast of there. Uncle George settled on the place he lived o n until he died. Father got a cabin just a little north of the little branch north of where the Evans girls live now. I think he bought the claim (brother Ned was born at that place), split boards to cover the cabins, weighted them down with poles; nail s were a scarce article then; split logs hewn smoothly on one side made the floors -- a log or two sawed out of the side -- and made the windows; door shutters were made of split boards, and the fire place was made of dirt pounded in hard; the chimney was made of mud and sticks."


-220-
"Deer and turkey were plentiful. Father would go out early of a morning and bring in a turkey, or perhaps kill a deer, and they trapped all the prairie chickens they wanted. Hogs fattened on mast, acorns, hickory nuts, hazel nuts, haws and other things. Meat was very cheap. We raised all kinds of vegetables, but had no fruit for years except the wild fruit, blackberries, wild strawberries, plums and wild crab apple."

The Waggoners had come from North Carolina through Tennessee and Kentucky into Illinois, a long trip for such a primitive way of traveling. (The other day, a dirigible covered about the same distance from Norfolk, passing over Sullivan to Belleville, in a few hours time.)

Mrs. Scott also mentions the arrival of the second group of Waggoners a few months or a year afterwards. She thinks it was two or three years, but that is the memory of a child of five to whom time moves very slowly. In this second group were John (know n and remembered as Uncle Jackie), his family and his son-in-law, Harmon Smith and their family; also Isaac Waggoner, Jr., and family, Joel Waggoner and family, and William Walker and family. Mrs. Walker was a daughter of Isaac Waggoner, Sr. We are info rmed that Joel was dissatisfied and returned to North Carolina.

Isaac, the patriarch of the family, had seven sons who came to Illinois, and six remained as permanent settlers. He had five daughters, the three named above, Mrs. Webb, Mrs. Walker, and Emsey (who became the wife of Gideon Edwards), and two daughters, M rs. Nancy Carrol and Mrs. Susan Harding, who remained in North Carolina.

In 1829 and 1830 there was a great immigration of settlers, mostly from Kentucky and Tennessee. There were some from Ohio and other Eastern States. Noted families who came in these early immigrations were the Smysors and

-221-
Monsons to the Whitley and Waggoner neighborhoods. Other early settlers in the south part of the county were Wright Little and Adam Hostetler. The Purvis and Bolin families settled further north in what is now East Nelson Township. Kellar, Thomson and Dawson were prominent settler families in the north part of the county. Other famous names there are Cochran, Foster and Gregory. And there was John Love who founded the village of Lovington, and who later led a party to join the Mormons at Nauvoo. The Marrowbone settlers include many important names: Crowder, Mitchell, Lansden, Bone, Noble and others. The Marrowbone settlement extended east into the border of Sullivan Township. The creeks are Marrowbone and Willow, and the largest and longest tribut ary of the river, which is known as West Okaw creek. There were early settlements south of Sullivan made by the Pattersons and Nomacks. The Snyders settled at the head of Jonathan Creek. Settlers came to what is now Lowe and Dora a few years later.

Settlers came thick and fast after the first two or three years, and interesting histories could be written about a number of families: the Smysors, Armantrouts, Munsons, Hendricks, Edwards, Davises, etc. Other men without large families helped to get th e settlements going. Daniel Ellington and William Haydon established a store, post office and school at Whitley's Point, near the John Whitley home. Some of us can remember the long string of log houses built end to end with connecting sheds or covered driveways that made up the town.

Then there was Eben Noyes, who was the largest land owner in the county and who built a town on the prairie on a farm now owned by the Hortenstine Brothers, and to get the travel away from Whitley's Point, marked a road by a plow furrow from Kickapoo east of Charleston through his town of Essex and to the Shelbyville road past the Waggoner

-222-
settlement. But the scheme wouldn't work, the timber at Whitley's Point being a better attraction to travelers.

Adam Hostetler and Wright Little came early, and their families were united by the marriage of a son and daughter, whose children and grandchildren still live in the county. Andrew Gammill's family is still represented here, and so is that of Gideon Edwa rds.

There is a large number of well-known schools in the county, such as Smyser, Whitfield, Baker, and many others whose histories should be written. Also there are the early churches, and the pioneer preachers like Bushrod Henry, Peter Warren, George Dalby, Willis Whitfield, Rezin Martin, John Turner, Levi Fleming, Father McGowan, Col. Morgan, Col. Vaughn, the Kellars, and a score of others in the first fifty or sixty years of our history.

It is said that the first religious meeting in Moultrie County was at the home of one of the Whitleys. Rev. Miles Hart, a Methodist minister, preached the first sermon at the home of Samuel Lindley, whose wife was a Whitley.

The earliest church was the Baptist Church at Lynn Creek. The Waggoners were Baptists; and William Harvey Martin, who then lived on Kickapoo, preached for them as early as 1829, and he organized the first church at Lynn Creek. There were about 20 member s, most of whom belonged to the Waggoner families. Their preacher, "Uncle Billy" Martin, moved to a farm near the church, where he officiated as pastor until his death in 1854.

A little later the Smysors and others joined a church of the Disciples, organized by either Tobias Grider or Bushrod W. Henry, or both together, and so the Smysor Church also began about ninety years ago, being the second church in

-223-
Whitley township, although there is an older Christian church in Lovington.

The old Lynn Creek church and the first Smysor church were log structures. Newport, Parker and Threlkeld, all famous preachers of that day, visited the Lynn Creek Church. Parker went to Texas, and there is a tradition that he was killed in the Indian wa rs. Certainly some of his family were captured. A stirring ballad has been written about the captivity of one of his daughters.

The story is interesting. She was married to a Commanche chief, and after she had been rescued by the whites several years later, she said she had been happy with her Indian husband and her children, but she was not permitted to return to them. Her son, a famous chief, waged a relentless war upon the whites to avenge what he thought were the wrongs of his mother, and the refrain of the ballad is "Freedom is sweet on the prairie."

In 1830, several new counties were organized. Coles was made to include the present Douglas and Cumberland counties. My great grandfather, James Scott Martin, who then lived at Kickapoo Point near Charleston, was chosen one of the three county commissio ners of Coles. He was still serving as Commissioner when in 1833 he moved to the Whitley and Waggoner settlements.

In the same year, 1830, Macon County was taken out of the north part of Shelby. The new county included what is now Piatt County and a strip nine miles wide off of what is now Moultrie County. The remainder of Shelby County -- including most of what is now Moultrie -- remained as a part of Shelby County.

-224-
About 1829 and 1830 several plats were made of town sites in what is now Moultrie County. The first settlement, Whitley's Point, was never platted.

The town of Nelson was the first to be platted, in 1829. The Lincoln family passed through in March 1830 when Lincoln was a month past his 21st birthday. There is a record of his saying that they crossed the river at Nelsonville, which of course was the old town of Nelson.

The record of the plat of the old town of Lovington, like that of the original town of Sullivan, was destroyed in the Court House fire in 1864. The plat itself may have been destroyed in the same fire. Anyway, the old plat was never found and placed of record. So the date of the settlement of Lovington as a town is not known.

The old plat of Marrowbone (now Bethany) suffered the same fate.

Most people acquainted with Moultrie County history know that Nelson, Lovington, and Marrowbone (now Bethany) existed before Sullivan was platted. Fewer people know that there were several old plats made of places that never grew into towns.

For instance, near Lovington, there was East Strington, and a few miles away there was West Strington. These ambitious places were sketched along the public road. The Blackhorse Tavern was between them, and was perhaps older than either. It was there i n 1833, but it was at first a country inn along the public road.

Then in Jonathan Creek, east and northeast of Sullivan, two sites were platted -- one called Ouasco, and another place named Julian (usually known as Julia Ann).

-225-
Whitley had two towns. There was Shanghai, which I remember as a little town of a half dozen houses and shops; and at Whitley's Point there was a row of log houses -- ten or twelve -- connected together either by partition walls or by a shaded area which served for wagon shelters. There was a post office here, and one building served as a church and school room. There was a store in the room with the post office.

William Haydon bought the entire town at the time the Whitleys moved away. Mr. Haydon was the merchant, the postmaster, and the school teacher. Both my parents went to school there. The post office of Whitley's Point was moved to the railroad station c alled Summit, and later both names were changed to Gays.

There was another plat on land in Whitley that never grew into a town. Ebenezer Noyes was the largest land holder there, and he decided to build a city. He located his plat a mile or more south of Whitley's Point. He named his plat Essex after a town o f New England, and in order to entice travel away from the Point, he marked with ox plows a new road from Kickapoo Point to Sand Creek to run by his town with markers along the way pointing to the town of Essex. But he never sold any lots and no town was built. After the organization of the county and the choice of the county seat, Mr. Noyes expressed his opinion of the selection. He said it was a shame to spoil a good forty acres of land with such a town as Sullivan. After Mattoon was started in 1855 , Noyes moved there and built a hotel, which he named the Essex House. He also laid off an addition and speculated and lost money in lots.

One other old town plat was of Glasgow, located on what is now the Harbaugh or Peadro farm. Some houses

-226-
were built there, and it was a contender in the selection of the county seat. When Asa's Point was selected, the houses in the town of Glasgow were moved to Sullivan.

In 1842 began a movement to organize the County of Moultrie from territory of Shelby, Macon and Coles. A Commission of three -- one from each of the most important towns in the territory (Nelson, Marrowbone, and Lovington) -- was chosen to present a peti tion to the Illinois legislature.

In early 1843, the legislature agreed, and Moultrie County was organized in February 1843. It was created from land which had been parts of Shelby and Macon counties. The north part -- a strip nine miles wide -- was taken from Macon County, and the rema inder was taken from Shelby.

The original petition upon which the act was based included a row of townships -- a strip six miles wide -- off of the west side of Coles County. However, people at Charleston objected to the taking of any part of Coles into the new county. Members of t he legislative Commission living at Lovington and Marrowbone voted to drop the Coles County strip so that the petition could be presented to the legislature without objection. John A. Freeland, our first County Clerk, who was then acting as clerk for the commissioners, said that if Fleming, the commissioner from Nelson, had held out for the larger territory, the bill would have been passed anyway. Freeland said that the Marrowbone and Lovington members of the Commission wanted to eliminate the Coles ter ritory because retaining it

-227-
would place Nelson too near the center of the county and make it more eligible for becoming the county seat.*

*A few years later, after the building of the Illinois Central railroad along the west side of Coles with the towns of Tuscola, Arcola, and Mattoon, the people of Charleston who had objected to any territory being put into Moultrie, or the ir successors, favored the organization of Douglas County to eliminate support for Mattoon as a contestant for the county seat.

If these four Coles townships had not been eliminated, the new county would have been of fair size, instead of being one of the smallest in the State. Moreover, the City of Mattoon, which was founded ten years later, would be in Moultrie County instead o f in Coles. However, it would have been too near the county line to be considered as a county seat. The location of Nelson along the river would have developed into a good town, and even Lovington and Marrowbone (now Bethany) would have fared better in the outcome by being located a little farther from the county seat. Of course Sullivan would not have been born. It was the act of the Lovington and Marrowbone commissioners in out-voting Fleming of Nelson that led to the selection of Asa's Point as the county seat, and it was the voters of these two settlements that insured the selection and building of the town of Sullivan.

Soon after the organization of Moultrie County in February 1843, the first county officers were elected. Nearly all of the first county officials were residents of the Nelson precinct. James Elder, then a merchant at Nelson, was elected County Judge, an d he served continuously for 18 years, until December 1861. In the early years, the County Judge had two associates, and besides acting as a court, they


-228-
supervised the financial business of the county, much as the Board of Supervisors does now. During the first two years following 1843, Nelson served as the county seat, and court was held most of the time at Nelson. Once it was convened at James Camfiel d's farm house a few miles southwest of the present site of Sullivan. Judge Elder's two associates were Steven Cannon and Joseph Baker.

John Perryman, Clerk of the Circuit Court, was also a merchant at Nelson. John A. Freeland, County Clerk, was a school teacher; and Walker, the Sheriff, was a farmer who had married into the Waggoner family. David Patterson, Probate Justice, was the onl y official who did not live in the Nelson precinct.

In 1845, two years after the organization of the new county, the site of the county seat was chosen. There were three candidates -- Nelson, Glasgow (a town which had been platted a few years earlier, one and one-half miles south of Sullivan), and the thi rd place "at or near Asa's Point." For the latter place, a tract of 40 acres was offered free, which the Pattersons and others had bought for the county for $100.

Asa's Point won a majority of the votes. The Commissioners chose the name of Sullivan in honor of General John Sullivan of Revolutionary War fame. The county had been named in honor of General William Moultrie of South Carolina, who had become famous fo r his defense of the City of Charleston in the Revolutionary War.* Mr. Freeland told me that he suggested to the County

*The General went by the name of "Mootry" -- the French pronunciation; but the county has been pronounced the way it looks in English.

-229-
Commissioners the name for the county seat. He said that as the county had been named for General Moultrie, he suggested the name of a northern man for the county seat; and so he recommended that it be named for a distinguished Revolutionary soldier, Gen . John Sullivan.* I noticed recently in a school circular of some kind that the City was named for an island off the coast of South Carolina. I hope that error will not be repeated. It does not harm General Sullivan, but it does no credit to us.

*General John Sullivan was born in 1740 in New Hampshire. He was a member of the Legislature, and was elected as a delegate to the first Continental Congress. In June 1775 (after the battle of Lexington) he was named as one of the Brigad ier Generals of the Continental Army. He was active in the siege of Boston and in the fighting at the battle of Long Island, where he was taken prisoner. After his exchange, he rejoined Washington's army and was made a Major General. He led the attack on the Hessions in the battle of Trenton, and in August following, he commanded in an attack on the British and Tories at Staten Island. He also led his division in the battles of Brandywine and Germantown.

To average the Indian atrocities at Wyoming and Cherry Valley, General Sullivan was sent in command of a strong foray against the Iroquois and their Tory allies in the Mohawk Valley; and his victory completely destroyed the power of the League of the Six Nations.

Later Sullivan was Governor of his state. He was one of Washington's appointees to the federal bench. He held this place as Judge of the New Hampshire District until his death in 1795 -- age 55 years. Some man!


-230-
The City plat was surveyed on the fifth day of March 1845. It was the day that James Knox Polk was inaugurated President, the fourth being on Sunday that year. There was a public sale of lots. The highest price was paid for the lot on which is now the First National Bank and the National Inn hotel. It has been the site of a hotel during all the century of its history. The price of the lot was $31. Early owners were James Elder and Joseph Thomason. Joseph Edgar Eden was the owner and manager of the hotel for more than a half century.

The first store building was moved from Glasgow and located on the outside corner southwest of the public square. For many years it has been known as the Shepherd Corner. James Elder moved his store -- not the building -- from Nelson and located at the southeast corner, either at the Progress corner or across the street south.

The north side was occupied by too many saloons. They called them groceries; such places are now taverns. It was called "sod corn" row, and here is where the famous scraps between Jonathan Creek and Lakey Bend occurred. Most of the names of these old c hampions are forgotten. However, Lowery Trailor is remembered as "cock of the walk" wherever he went. I remember once seeing the old man sitting on a horse straight as an Indian, though well past the age of 80 years. Two friends were riding on either s ide to prevent accident.

The county business was now done at Sullivan though the court house was not finished until the next year, 1846. Most of the officers were also business men. James Elder, the County Judge, and John Perryman, Circuit Clerk, were merchants. John A. Freela nd, County Clerk and Recorder, owned a farm just north of the town plat. Joseph Thomason, Sheriff, kept a boarding house and a livery stable.

-231-
David Patterson, Probate Judge, was a farmer and lived in the brick house that stood south of town until it had to be torn down because it was too close to state road no. 32. Prior to 1847 each county had a separate probate court. Patterson was elected probate justice in 1843 and served until the probate business was placed under the jurisdiction of the circuit court.

The officers were about evenly divided between Democrats and Whigs, either by agreement or by the voters' preferences. Judge Elder and Uncle John Freeland were Whigs, while Judge Patterson, Perryman, and the Thomasons were Democrats.

Judge James Elder, who was first elected County Judge in 1843, served in that office until December 1861 -- a little more than eighteen years. He had been regularly elected without opposition. He had belonged to the Whig party and was reelected in 1857 after the formation of the Republican party, which he had joined. Party feeling was higher in 1861, and he was not then a candidate for reelection.

Very little has ever been published about Judge Elder. It is well known that through the early years he was regarded as the leading citizen of the county. Like the Waggoners he came from North Carolina. He put in a stock of goods at Nelson, where he wa s the leading merchant for 15 years. He moved to Sullivan in 1845 and lived on a 600 acre farm, part of which is now in the city. He became the owner of nearly 2000 acres of choice land, and became an investment banker. He owned bank stock in Mattoon a nd elsewhere, but never established a regular bank of deposit in Sullivan. He was the wealthiest man in the county when he died in 1867.

-232-
John A. Freeland was another distinguished citizen among the early settlers of the county. He too came from Carolina. He had crippled feet, and he walked with his crutches much of the way. He was in Tennessee awhile. He was a school teacher in the 183 0's, and in 1843 became our first County Clerk, and held the office for ten years, when he was succeeded by Charles A. Roane, who served until 1861. Both Freeland and Roane were Whigs who became Republicans in 1856. Each of them served one term as repre sentative in the legislature some years later -- Freeland being elected in 1872 and Roane in 1882.

Two other great men of that day were Joseph and Arnold Thomason, brothers who came from Kentucky, along with the Kellars, and settled in the Lovington neighborhood.

Joseph Thomason was elected Sheriff about 1845 and served almost continuously for 30 years. He was defeated by a ruse in 1854, and he later gave way to Samuel Earp and several others -- Berry, Kearney, and Carter -- each for a short term of two years. I n 1876 he and his friends were caught napping unaware of serious opposition; and in a delegate convention several other names were proposed, and after a few ballots Wash Linder was nominated.

Arnold Thomason was elected Circuit Clerk and Recorder in 1856 and again in 1860. In 1864 Joseph H. Waggoner was elected and served for 16 years. He was a son of Amos Waggoner, another distinguished citizen, and it was his brother John who made a still hunt for the same office twelve years before. Arnold Thomason, however, did not quit. The next year he was elected County Judge and served 12 years, giving way to Judge Jonathan Meeker in 1877 because the legislature had so enlarged the jurisdiction of the County Court that it was thought advisable to elect a good lawyer. (Judge Meeker served nine years, and his

-233-
common law terms were as busy and dignified as a circuit court.) But next year, 1878, Judge Thomason was elected representative in the legislature, receiving substantially the entire vote of Lovington and carrying the county by about one thousand majority .

In addition to this list of splendid men elected to fill county offices in the early years of the county -- Elder, Freeland, Roane and the two Thomasons -- there was John Perryman, also a merchant, who served 9 years as Circuit Clerk; David Patterson, who served as probate justice until the adoption of the new constitution, when the office was discontinued in 1848; and Arnold Waggoner, the most prominent of that pioneer family, who was for awhile an associate justice of the County Court. He was the fathe r of John and Joseph H. Waggoner, the Circuit Clerk. Another son was Dr. Edward E. Waggoner, who lived at Shelbyville. One of his daughters married Andrew Scott, who was the contractor in building our first court house. Two sons of the latter (who were also grandsons of Amos Waggoner) were A.E.D. Scott, County Treasurer for 9 years, and Louis K Scott, eight years County Clerk.

Similar dignity and ability were shown by Henry Moulton Minor, who as a resident of Lovington was elected on the Republican ticket in 1886. Later he was a judge and a state senator in Colorado. Judge Minor served only three years when he resigned and th e Governor appointed Charles N. ______ adell, an intelligent businessman who was not exactly suited for a place on the bench, but who perhaps did as well as two or three rather poor lawyers among his successors. His term ended just 60 years ago, in 1890 [which indicates when this portion of the text was written].

Our member of Congress in 1846 was a Democrat, Orland Ficklin, who lived at Charleston. The State Senator

-234-
--also a Democrat, was Peter Warren, who lived on Sand Creek in Shelby County. The two parties in the county were near equal strength, but beginning with Polk in 1844 the county voted Democrat in every presidential election until 1904, when Roosevelt car ried the county against Parker. One time it was very close. Greely in 1872 had only a lead of twenty three votes over Grant. The next election, 1876, Tilden had more than 500 majority. Three Democratic candidates have each carried the county three tim es -- Cleveland, Bryan, and F.D. Roosevelt. (Dewey had a small lead in 1944.)

Nothing of importance occurred in the political history of the county until 1852. In that year, in the Democrat primary no open opposition appeared against Perryman's re-election as Circuit Clerk, and there was a very light vote. But a still hunt made i n the Whitley and Nelson precincts by John Waggoner resulted in his nomination. In the general election, many Democrats who resented such method voted for the Whig candidate, Wilson Lloyd, who was elected. When the new Republican party was organized, Ll oyd became a Democrat, but he died in 1856 before the end of his term and was succeeded by Arnold Thomason, who held the office two terms, until 1864, when Joseph H. Waggoner was elected to continue for four terms, or 16 years.

It was about this time, either in 1852 or 1854 (the election returns were all destroyed when the court house was burned in 1864) that there was a close race for Sheriff. It was not determined until the returns from the precinct which is now Lowe township came in, which gave Kearney a small lead over Thomason, the Democrat. Judge W.G. Cochran told me that many years later a man who lived in the north part of Jonathan Creek told him that on the next day after the election, he was in Sullivan and learned o f the close vote on Sheriff. He went to see the election judge who had

-235-
possession of the returns in the missing precinct. They altered the returns and changed the ballots to give a slight majority to Kearney, whose home was in that precinct. Judge Cochran said he was not sure the story was true. The man might have been tr ying to pose himself as a sort of hero.

Our first congressman, Ficklin, had been succeeded by James S. Robinson, a famous pioneer lawyer, and in 1852 James C. Allen of Olney was elected. He too was a Democrat. In 1854, Nathaniel Parker, a State Senator living in Coles County, became a candida te against Allen for the Democrat nomination. Parker had many friends in the Nelson and Whitley precincts, partly because he was a brother of Daniel Parker, a famous Baptist minister who had held meetings there. The leaders in Sullivan retaliated for th e Waggoner-Perryman still hunt campaign by holding a mass meeting for selecting delegates to the congressional convention without letting Parker's friends know about it. A delegate convention was held later at which Parker delegates were selected. John R. Eden, a young lawyer who had lately located in Sullivan, was one of the Allen delegates, and he and my grandfather, John Martin, representing the Parker men, reached a compromise by which both delegations were admitted to the district convention, each delegate having a half vote. The district convention was held in the old Christian Church in Sullivan, which was quite a large auditorium. Allen was renominated, but the election in November was so close and so uncertain that Congress ordered a second e lection, at which Allen was chosen.

The first lawyer in Sullivan was Samuel W. Moulton, who later moved to Shelbyville, where he became distinguished as a great lawyer. He served long in the state legislature and won there the name of being the father of the

-236-
Illinois Free School system. He served three or more terms in Congress, one as a representative from the state at large.

Another famous man, General Richard Oglesby, was a lawyer here before he volunteered for the Mexican War. He was a general in the Civil War, was a U.S. Senator, and was the only man who has been three times elected Governor of Illinois.

In the year 1855 there was a "cholera" scare in Sullivan and other towns of central Illinois. There were about a half-dozen deaths here attributed to the plague. The leading physician, Dr. William A. Kellar, was stricken and died. He was a minister als o and pastor of the Christian Church in Sullivan. He and John R. Eden had an office together. Mr. Eden said that one afternoon he complained of feeling ill and went home. He died the next day.

This year, 1855, was noted for the effort to establish what would now be called prohibition in Illinois. The measure was known as the Maine Liquor Law, and was copied from the law in force in that state. Our legislature had passed the measure with the a dded provision to submit it to the voters of the state for final passage or rejection. In that way the members of the legislature avoided responsibility and most politicians kept out of discussion. The preachers were not so timid, and most public discus sions were led by them. Most Methodists favored the law while the Baptists generally opposed.

Col. John W.R. Morgan, who was then pastor of the Sullivan Methodist Church, favored the adoption of the law. Arrangement was made for a joint discussion between him and Dr. W.A. Kellar, but before the time arrived, Dr. Kellar died, and Rezin C. Martin, the pastor of Lynn Creek Baptist Church, took his place in the debate. The meeting was held

-237-
in the big Christian Church, which was filled full of listeners, and many stood outside and listened through the open windows. John R. Eden presided at the meeting, and the arguments were said to have been eloquent and spirited. It was a strange inciden t that Mr. Martin, who had taken the place of Dr. Kellar, also died a few weeks after the debate.

Col. Morgan met all comers in debate, and discussions were held at Lovington and Marrowbone. I heard Judge Cochran say that he heard. the debate at Lovington. The opposition to the law was made by the Christian Church pastor, but he did not remember hi s name. He was sure that it was not Kellar. In the election, the law was overwhelmingly beaten. The prohibition question was never again submitted to the voters of Illinois until we voted on the question of repeal of National Prohibition in 1933.

For 25 years, until township organization was adopted in 1867, the County Court acted as Commissioners in charge of the financial business of the county. Old citizens used to contend that under Judges Elder, Eden and Thomason and their associate justices , the business was more efficiently conducted than it has been by a board of supervisors.

Two court houses were built under such management. The first was paid for partly by receipts from sale of city lots in Sullivan. This court house burned in December 1864.

The second, in 1865 in the last years of Judge Joseph Edgar Eden's term (with Joseph Baker and Steven Cannon as associates), was paid for by funds derived from sale of swamp and overflowed lands in the county. The federal government had donated all swamp s and overflowed lands to the states; and Illinois passed the title to such lands to the counties in which they were situated. Moultrie County had several hundred acres, mostly in Sullivan and Lowe

-238-
townships. Hundreds of acres were sold at fair prices. Even the land in Eagle Pond (or swamp) brought $4.00 per acre. Much of the public land in Lowe township was sold at $6.00.

The present court house (the third) is the only one that was paid for entirely from taxes. This was done without the issue of bonds, the tax being levied in three annual installments. The first collection was levied before a contract was made, and the la st was collected about the time the building was completed. A story is told of Uncle George Ballard of Jonathan Creek, who had opposed the building of a new house. He was in an office in the new court house when someone asked him how he liked the new bu ilding. He said, "Oh, it's all right -- fine. I guess we will all say so when we come to pay for it." He owned several hundred acres, and his tax was quite an item. Someone said, "Uncle George, have you paid your taxes for this year." "Yes," he said. "I have the receipt in my pocket." "You have then paid all of your part of the cost," he was told.

During this period, the county also had no County Attorney or County Superintendent of Schools. Prosecutors were selected by a district attorney elected by a district of several countries. School affairs were managed by a Commissioner appointed by the C ounty Court.

Before the Civil War there was little bitterness in party contests. There were many personal friendships that were not embittered by party strife even during and immediately after the War. Judge Elder, the Whig leader and for many years our leading citi zen, had friends in all parties and no enemies in either. John R. Eden, the Democratic leader, was active in politics for 40 years without suffering the loss of any personal friendships. Republican voters helped elect him as District Attorney in 1856 an d to Congress in 1862. Again, in 1874 when many Democrats had joined the

-239-
Farmers Party, making his election doubtful, Republicans like John Powell, John Milligen, Charles A. Roane, and many others were actively for him. Without such Republican support at that time, he might have been defeated.

Bitter taunts were sometimes thrown about; but among friends they passed as jests. I remember an incident -- long after the War -- a meeting between Uncle Joe Thomason and Dr. Nathan Cheever of Lovington. They were very old men at the time. Uncle Joe s aid, "Nathan, I don't like you. You are a Black Republican."Cheever extended his hand and said, "How are you, you old Rebel."

-240-
22.
THE LINCOLN-DOUGLAS SPEECHES IN SULLIVAN*

I.J. Martin

*I.J. Martin wrote several versions of his recollections of what he had been told about the Lincoln-Douglas speeches in Sullivan. One of these was published in the Moultrie County News, Centennial Edition, July 5, 1973, p. 12A. Th ese several sets of notes have been edited to form the single account that appears here.

On September 20, 1858, occurred what was sometimes later referred to as the Lincoln-Douglas "riot" in Sullivan. It was a very small affair; and only the light-minded observer would have called it a riot.

I had many sources of information about this affair. My father was there; he was then 25 years of age, and had a way of keeping his eyes and ears open. He did not engage in the so-called "riot", but he thought he saw and heard it all. My father-in-law, John R. Eden, was Chairman of the Douglas meeting, and made a short speech of introduction. He was also on the reception committee, and was with Douglas from the Senator's arrival at the Eden House until the close of the public meeting. He did not leav e the speakers' stand, but could see the affair, and he talked with many who were closer. I talked too with Captain Lee, who was a participant, and who later served as a soldier through the War and became a very partisan Republican. Also, I discussed th e events with Henry M. Minor, who was a great admirer of Douglas. He listened to the Senator's speech, and then ran to the Grove to hear Lincoln. He saw much of the disturbance around the crowd at the Douglas meeting, and


-241-
he once told me what he saw and heard. His story tallied well with what my father related of what he saw.

The Lincoln and Douglas meeting at Sullivan was not a real debate. There had been a joint discussion or debate between the two candidates at Charleston on Saturday before the Sullivan gatherings on Monday.*

*Editor's note: The substance of the remarks of Lincoln and Douglas at Sullivan has not been preserved. Perhaps their statements were not too different from their speeches at Charleston two days earlier, on September 18, 1858 -- the fourt h of the seven debates during the fall campaign -- which are set forth in Political Debates Between Hon. Abraham Lincoln and Hon. Stephen A. Douglas, Columbus, 1860. For the newspaper accounts of these speeches, see Collections of the Illinois State Historical Library, III, Lincoln Series, 1, edited by Edwin E. Sparks, Springfield, 1908.

Lincoln's remarks in Charleston on the subject of social and political equality of the races show how differently people thought and spoke about such matters a hundred and thirty years ago (Sparks, at 267):

"While I was at the hotel today, an elderly gentleman called upon me to know whether I was really in favor of producing a perfect equality between the negroes and white people. While I had not proposed to myself on this occasion to say much on that subje ct, yet as the question was asked me, I thought I would occupy perhaps five minutes in saying something in regard to it. I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the w hite and black races; that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say, in addition to this, that there is a physical difference b etween the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and in ferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race."


-242-
Some weeks before, when the joint debates were scheduled, the Douglas slate committee arranged meetings for the Senator for the times between the joint meetings. It was then that the Sullivan meeting for Douglas was announced.

Lincoln fixed his own dates and usually arranged them to follow closely after the Douglas dates, sometimes for a night meeting after a Douglas speech in the afternoon. So far as I know, there is now no record of when the Lincoln meeting in Sullivan was f irst advertised, but it was probably but a short time before the meeting.

John Ginn, a farmer living a few miles east of Sullivan, attended the Charleston meeting, and on Sunday brought Senator Douglas in his carriage from Charleston to his home, where the Senator remained until Monday morning. Judge James Elder met Mr. Lincol n at Mattoon and conveyed him to his farm home, which has since been enlarged and is now one of the good homes on East Jackson Street.

Felix Ashworth, then a boy in his early teens living on the North Okaw in Coles County, related an incident connected with the Lincoln-Douglas visits to Sullivan. Felix belonged to a family which was Democratic before the War.

-243-
He was riding along the dusty roadway when he was overtaken and passed by John Ginn's carriage. He and his horse were covered by a cloud of dust, and for mischief he decided to retaliate. He passed the carriage and for a while trotted along just ahead o f the carriage. His steed was of the heavy footed plow horse variety, and his steps raised plenty of dust. After a while the driver called to him that Senator Douglas was in the carriage, and asked him to follow them. The boy at once complied, for as h e said, he "thought Senator Douglas was next in dignity to the Ruler of the Universe."

On Monday morning, Senator Douglas came to the Eden House in Sullivan, and held a reception for his friends and supporters in the forenoon. While he was at the Eden House, Douglas was handed a note written and signed by Mr. Lincoln proposing that he woul d begin his speech at 3 o'clock in Freelands Grove if Douglas would so inform his audience at the beginning of his address in the Court House yard at 1 o'clock. In this way, the two meetings would not conflict. Also, Lincoln was a shrewd campaigner, and here as usual he sought the advantage of holding his meeting following that of Douglas. Douglas accepted these terms, and it appears that both Lincoln and Douglas adhered to the agreement.

Douglas was to speak on the east side of the square, a stand having been erected among the trees near the street line, which allowed the crowd to occupy wagons and buggies in the street as well as the seats around the stand. Seats for a thousand or more people were laid under the shade on the north, west, and south sides of the stand. By the time the meeting began, the street was nearly filled with buggies and spring wagons, leaving only a narrow passage on the east side of the street. Hundreds of men stood around the stand and

-244-
among the vehicles. It was a very large crowd, numbering perhaps 2,000.

John R. Eden, my father-in-law, was chairman of the meeting and introduced Senator Douglas with a short complimentary speech. Douglas, after making the announcement of the Lincoln meeting for 3 o'clock, began his address about 20 minutes past 1 o'clock. Those were the days of much oratory and long speeches, two hours being required for a great speech. However, Douglas was nearing the end of his speech, and would have finished before 3 o'clock if he had not been disturbed.

The Lincoln supporters had hired a Terre Haute band and brought it over for the Sullivan meeting. About 1:30 p.m, the band began playing on a vacant lot at the intersection of Jackson and Hamilton Streets, near where the Powers School building now stands . The purpose, of course, was to keep the Lincoln partisans away from the Douglas meeting.

About an hour later, a parade was formed on West Harrison Street, and it started to move eastward. When Main Street was reached, instead of turning north to the Grove, a turn to the south was made. Headed by the Terre Haute band and led by a young Marsh al, George Lynn [or Lynch?], the procession moved along the west side of the square to Jefferson Street, and then to the east along the south side of the square, the band playing all the while.

Douglas, who was nearing the end of his speech, stopped speaking, remarking that he was used to that sort of courtesy in Northern Illinois but had not expected it here.

The parade, which was not really a very big affair -- perhaps two or three hundred people -- was made up largely

-245-
of men from the Marrowbone and Todd's Point settlements. No one from Sullivan was in the procession.

Judge Anthony Thornton was a prominent lawyer of Shelbyville, and he had been invited to address the meeting after Douglas' speech. Thornton and Lincoln had been associated as leaders of the Illinois Whigs. Both of them supported General Scott against F ranklin Pierce in 1852, and both regretted the movement to abandon the Whig party and organize the new Republican Party. But when the new party was organized, Lincoln joined it and Thornton became a Democrat. On the day of the Sullivan meeting, the loca l Republicans were more bitter against Thornton than against Douglas. He had many old Whig friends, and they feared his influence over them. Their strategy was to get as many as possible of the Douglas hearers to leave the meeting and hear Lincoln at th e Grove and thus reduce the size of Thornton's audience. John R. Eden later said he doubted if the Republicans intended any discourtesy to Senator Douglas.

The Douglas crowd expected that the parade would move on eastward to Madison Street, where it could turn and march north directly into the Grove where Lincoln's meeting was to be held. But instead, a turn was made north on Washington Street, and the proc ession started along or through the crowd that was waiting for Douglas to resume his speech. This provoked an angry outcry. A young lawyer, Alsey B. Lee, who was then a Democrat, shouted an Old Hickory oath, "By the Eternal, you can't do that," and jump ed over the fence, followed by perhaps twenty men.

Douglas urged the Democrats to allow the procession to pass peaceably. Also, Judge Thornton left the speakers' stand and asked Lee and others to allow them to pass. While Thornton was making his plea, a Marrowbone farmer

-246-
-- Azel Younger, whom I knew as a fine old gentleman many years after -- seeing Thornton shouted, "What are you doing in that crowd, you traitor." At that, Thornton started to climb the fence too, but his friends kept him back.

It did not take long for Lee and the others to turn the band wagon at the head of the procession back to Jefferson Street, where the march continued to Madison Street, and then on to the Grove. The Republicans offered no resistance, and there was no riot , or any personal encounter. In the excitement, some foolish man or boy threw a brick that hit one of the band boys, who was slightly injured.

At the Grove, a stand had been erected under the elms that are still standing at the entrance of Wyman Park. There Lincoln made a speech said to have been two hours long.

It was later charged that Lincoln was in the procession that disrupted the Douglas meeting, but that was not true, and none of those best informed thought so. Lincoln at that time was trying to compete with Douglas in personal appeal, and he had gone qui etly with Judge Elder to the meeting in the Grove. It is clear that Lincoln did not know of the interruption of the Douglas meeting; and, if course, neither he nor any of the leading Republicans had anything to do with it.

A.B. Lee, who led in the move to turn the parade away from the Douglas assembly, was a great admirer of Douglas as long as he lived. He took the advice of Douglas and supported the Union cause, commanding three different companies, one of these being in the famous 41st regiment of Illinois Volunteers. Still later a Republican politician, he never regretted his action. He said no one was to blame except the young parade marshal. He also said that the marshal, George Lynn [Lynch?], admitted that it was a

-247-
mistake to try to march north on Washington Street instead of going on to Madison. George Lynn also led a company in the War, and some of us yet remember his erect figure and armless sleeve in the years after the War.

The affair was regretted by all sensible people, and no effort was made to exploit the event to the help or injury of either side.

Efforts have since been made to make this small disturbance at Sullivan match the so-called riot at Charleston a few years later. A St. Louis newspaper published a partisan report from a Douglas supporter, and the Quincy Whig had one on the other side even more unfair. The St. Louis reporter had been assigned to the Douglas campaign, and he witnessed the melee, such as it was. The man who made the report to the Quincy Whig had been a Moultrie County sheriff. He may have been in town that day, but he was said not to have been near the place. He was sure that the Democrats who turned the procession were "border ruffians", using a phrase applied to Missourians and other Southerners who tried to settle in Kansas.

There was no riot and no fight. Neither Captain Lynn, nor Captain Lee and those who supported him, should be slandered as "border ruffians" by newspaper accounts that were biased and partial, or by anonymous "historical letters."

-248-
23.
NOTES ON THE HISTORY OF SULLIVAN*

I.J. Martin

*I.J. Martin's papers contain several writings on the history of Sullivan. For the period prior to Sullivan's incorporation in 1872, we have only sketchy handwritten notes. For the period subsequent to 1872, we have two more extensive pi eces, including one published as "A Glimpse of Sullivan's History," Moultrie County News, Centennial Edition, July 5, 1973, p. 1, 2A. These several writings have been edited into this single of "Notes."

The town of Sullivan was platted or surveyed on March 5, 1845, two years after the County of Moultrie was established. The location, then known as Asa's Point, had been selected as the county seat by popular vote a few weeks earlier. The town was named in honor of General John Sullivan, a soldier of the Revolutionary War.

Moultrie County was the owner of the 40-acre tract upon which the town of Sullivan was platted. It was purchased for $100, and it has been said that the price was donated by the Pattersons and Snyders and others living near Asa's Point. The plat include d twenty five blocks, each 200 feet square. The center block was not given a number, and it was reserved for location of the court house. The others were given numbers from 1 to 24, and each was divided into 8 lots of 50 feet street frontage. The unusu ally small blocks made an awkward arrangement of building sites, and the large number of streets thus created is also a bad feature of the plan.


-249-
The Commissioners made another mistake when they put the entire list of 192 lots on sale at auction. There was little demand for building, and many of the lots sold for a trifling consideration. The highest price paid was $31, for the lot on which the F irst National Bank is now located. A wiser plan would have been to make a fair appraisement and to sell the lots as they were needed for building sites or other purposes.

The first building in Sullivan was a business room moved from Glasgow and located on the outer corner southwest of the court house square. The two leading stores at Nelson, one of them owned by County Judge James Elder and the other by the Clerk of the C ircuit Court, John Perryman, were promptly moved to Sullivan. Judge Elder continued in business for twenty years or more as merchant and private banker, and was generally regarded as Sullivan's leading citizen.

J. Wilson Lloyd, a little later, established a general store. He was also a lawyer. But his promising success was checked by illness, and he was succeeded as a merchant by Orange Clark Martin of a Whitley Creek pioneer family. This store room was on th e east side, where the McClure building now stands. The early structures have all disappeared.

The oldest building now facing the court house square is the one at the northeast corner. It was for a long while occupied by the Lewis & Lilly bookstore. Dr. Thomas L. Lewis also had his office in the room with a small stock of medicine and drugs for s ale.

There are two other early buildings on the square -- the Corbin building on the south side, erected in 1866 or 1867, and the three Trower rooms on the west side, built at the

-250-
same time. The Shepherd building just off the square at the southwest is older, but it has been remodeled and partly rebuilt. The Reithmiller building, off the square at the northeast corner, was built in 1871.

North of the square was the area known as sod-corn row. Most of the quarrels along this row were settled by the disputants themselves in "fair fights." There were at first no licensed saloons. Whisky was sold at the groceries. This changed in 1855 when a state law was passed which forbid the sale without license of liquor in quantities less than one pint.

Whiskey was then a popular remedy for ague, chills and fever, and snake bite, and it was often bought by the gallon jug -- sometimes by the keg or barrel. There was no heavy tax to pay, and it was cheap in large quantities. Even in a pint bottle, it cos t much less than by the glass.

When the 1855 law went into effect, it is said that David Reed, a rich landowner, came to Sullivan and put on a great show at one of the groceries. He bought a pint cup full of whiskey, and in front of the store delivered an illustrious lecture. He said that heretofore a man could take a drink and go away, but now he had to drink a pint. He could not give any to his friends, but had to drink it all himself. Finally declining to get drunk (at this time), he threw the remainder in the street. For years people talked of "Dave Reed's temperance speech."

More than one half of the business area around the court house has been swept by fire one or more times.

For a while after Sullivan was platted, it had no distinct political organization. The people depended upon the justice of the peace, constable, sheriff and other county officers

-251-
appointed by the County Commissioner to serve in the precinct. Later a town or village organization was established, which served until the village became a city in 1873.

We have no official record of the first sixteen years following 1845 because the records were destroyed in the court house fire in November 1864. It is said the City Clerk was usually also employed as County Clerk, and the records were kept in the county office.

The earliest record begins in the year 1861, and was kept in a little book that in some way escaped the fire. This record shows that in 1861 or before, there had been established a town or village government with a board of trustees and other officers.

The most interesting thing in this old 1861 record relates to the great Civil War, or the War of Secession -- or of the great rebellion, as it was sometimes called. The village clerk was Charles B. Steele, a young lawyer. It is recorded that he resigned and volunteered in the War for the Union. Young Steele was married, and while he was in the service his wife and two young sons made their home with the family of Major Addison W. McPheeters, whose two sons, Rankin and Addison W., also went to the war. Steele served throughout the war and reached the rank of Major. He practiced law in Mattoon after the war, and for a while served in the legislature as a Senator. His son, William A. Steele, will be remembered as the unfortunate president of the defunc t Merchants and Farmers State Bank.

Little of interest appears in the record through the 1860's and 1870's. Saloon licenses were issued, and sidewalks and culverts were built. Prominent businessmen,

-252-
doctors, lawyers, and county officials served as village trustees and presidents of the council.

Sullivan was chartered as a city in 1872. In that year, Thomas M. Bushfield, County Treasurer, who was the last president of the village Board of Trustees, assumed the duties of Mayor of the new city, and served until the first city election in April 187 3.

Victor Thompson was chosen Mayor of Sullivan at the first city election, which was held in April 1873. Mr. Thompson was the leading merchant of Sullivan at the time. He occupied both store rooms in the Titus Opera building. There were men's clothing in one room and dry goods in the other, and there were open passages from one room to the other. There was little to do as Mayor, but Mr. Thompson was a very busy merchant. He served two terms as Mayor.

In 1877, Xavier B. Trower, a banker, was elected the second Mayor of Sullivan. His first term as Mayor was the period of the great Murphy temperance movement. It was a time of great excitement, when temperance societies were organized everywhere in town s, churches, and county schools. Blue ribbons were pinned on nearly every coat, and even women and girls signed the Murphy temperance pledge.

In a year or two the temperance advocators began to adopt the idea that the best way to promote temperance was to prohibit the sale of liquor. This idea was not entirely new. In 1855 a state law had been proposed to prohibit the manufacture and sale of liquor except for "mechanical, medical or sacerdotal purposes." Though it appeared that the proposed exception would provide plenty of room, the people of the state voted against the proposed law.

-253-
In every city and village at the election in 1879, the Murphy movement sought to close the saloons. This election furnished Sullivan with its first real city contest. Mayor Trower favored the reissue of saloon licenses, and his name headed the license t icket. The anti-saloon party named a full ticket, with Murray McDonald, a young business man, at the head.

The election of 1879 was marked by the first appearance of J.H. "Jack" Baker in local politics. In the city campaign, he played his earliest political trick. Both conventions were held on the same evening, and Jack had friends in each to propose his name for City Attorney, and he was nominated in both. As Baker was coming down the stairs from the court room where the temperance party held its meeting, he told one of his friends, "My election is certain for I will be nominated at the other caucus." The a ction offended a majority of each party and resulted in W.M. Stanley, who was then a justice of the peace, being written in on the printed tickets; and Baker was beaten.

The Trower ticket for Mayor and Aldermen was ahead in a close contest. But while his supporters were celebrating the victory with bonfires and other evidences of enthusiasm, Trower and his lawyer were in the bank preparing an assignment for the benefit o f his creditors. At 12 o'clock midnight, a special train -- an engine with one coach -- stopped at the main street crossing, south of town, and Trower and his wife went aboard. He carried some hand baggage, which doubtless contained among other valuable s enough money for immediate needs.

William Kirkwood was chosen Mayor and served through the term for which Trower had been re-elected. By the end of this term, the temperance movement somewhat subsided, and the license party won the election easily.

-254-
Benjamin S. Jennings was elected Mayor in April 1881. He held an old time idea that the less interference or regulation of the liquor business, the better. He was a radical believer in what was then called "personal liberty." Saloon licenses were grante d to men who were incapable of conducting an orderly business. One of the two saloons had been a wild and disorderly place, and the administration had been much discredited.

In 1883, the license question was again made the issue. Mayor Jennings was a candidate for re-election on the license ticket; but the anti-saloon party had revived. As a result, one of the most popular businessmen, Demosthenes F. Bristow, was elected Ma yor, along with a complete list of aldermen pledged against the granting of saloon licenses. This was the first time in Sullivan that the sale of liquor had been forbidden. But some people managed to procure liquor, and at times the maintenance of order was very difficult. Sullivan had never been without saloons, and the drinkers seized every chance to advance their "personal liberty." Street fights often occurred; and one wild Christmas Eve there was almost a riot. James T. Taylor was City Marshal, a nd a good one. He and his deputies quelled the Christmas Eve riot so vigorously that some of the bullies -- the Corys and the Carters -- left town. At the end of Bristow's term, an agreement was made to submit the question of license to a popular vote. In the election of 1885, the license forces carried by a substantial majority. Then began a license period of 20 years.

The agreement to submit the license issue to a vote took the liquor question out of the contest for mayor. Bristow declined to run for a second term. The Citizens Party, which had been for granting licenses, now held a primary election for the nominatio n of candidates. Murray MacDonald, who

-255-
had been the no-license candidate against Trower, was one of the candidates, and W.H. Shinn, a lawyer who had just finished a term as States Attorney, was the other. Shinn was nominated and had no opposition in the regular April election.

William Hollins Shinn, elected in 1885, was the sixth Sullivan Mayor. The people had voted in favor of license, but there was a dispute as to the amount of the fee. Three of the aldermen -- Ansbacher, Cummins, and Thuneman -- favored a fee of $500; but two -- Wiley and Dunlap -- proposed to follow the Mayor"s suggestion of $1000. Lambrecht favored $750. The temperance people favored the higher license fee in the mistaken belief that a high license would make a better class of saloons. Others feared t hat a high license fee would put an end to five cent beer. They argued about this for three months, and finally agreed on $750 for the first year and $1000 thereafter.

However, Alderman Thuneman held out to the last. He said too high fees led to law violation because, he said, an orderly saloon could not obey the law and be able to pay expenses. "They would have to be criminal to make money." The history of the saloon business afterwards offered some proof that he was right.

The pro-license vote in 1885 began a license period of 20 years. In 1906 saloons were voted out, and the same vote was registered in 1907. Sullivan became anti-saloon territory and remained so until the era of National prohibition. It seems strange tha t for the first sixty or more years we had only the one time, 1883 to 1885 -- just two years -- without saloons.

Mayor Shinn in 1885 offered the first plan of permanent improvement that had ever been proposed for Sullivan. In

-256-
--the first forty years of its history, nothing had been done except temporary work on streets and sidewalks. Now a system of street lights was planned, financed by the saloon license fees. A line of street corner gasoline lamps on posts was erected alo ng each street leading from the court house. Each evening a policeman would make the rounds to light the lamps, and in the morning a similar trip was made to extinguish the lights. This improvement was not so permanent after all, for six years later the lamps were replaced by electric lights.

In 1887 Walter Eden, who had recently been elected County Treasurer, was chosen Mayor without opposition. He was but 23 years of age, and was said to be the youngest County Treasurer and the youngest Mayor in the state. He and the Council continued the permanent improvements begun by Mayor Shinn by putting in a system of water-works. A 90-foot well was dug, and a pump provided to be run by a wind engine. A huge wooden tank 60 feet high was put on a tower, and a pipe conducted the water to and around t he court house square. It was made to supply fire protection for the business part of town. The system worked well for a while until fine sand began to pile up in the well. This trouble continued for many years, until deeper wells were drilled, and fin ally after thirty years a new and better plant was established.

Mayor Eden was re-elected in 1889, but not without opposition. George Brosam headed an anti-saloon ticket, but without success.

During Eden's second term, Sullivan got some bad publicity in the publication of a story in a St. Louis paper. The publisher had sent a questionnaire to the chief of police of each city, and the Sullivan chief gave his to his son, a high school boy, who was just a little too smart. The boy

-257-
answered all the questions. It was a lurid report, and the paper gave it a prominent place in its sensational article, and Sullivan was branded as the wickedest city in the country. Murder was the most prevalent; crime and drunkenness were increasing, e specially among women.

An indignation meeting was held, which attracted a mass attendance. Resolutions were passed endorsing the Mayor and Council, but demanding the resignation of the chief of police. He sent his resignation to the Mayor the next day, and the excitement subs ided.

In 1891, Mayor Eden was not a candidate for re-election at the end of his second term, having decided to move to California. The license question was submitted to a vote, and was not an issue between the candidates for mayor.

Nevertheless, the city election in 1891 was a strenuous contest. The Peoples' Party nominated James Wesley Elder for Mayor, and the other ticket -- the Citizens Party -- was headed by Frank M. Harbaugh. This election was long remembered for the sensatio nal buying of votes. One incident was the organization of a gang of tile ditch diggers, 16 in one group, headed and managed by Brewer Russell, who offered their votes for sale to the highest bidder. The Citizens Party had only a small campaign fund, but the Peoples Party supporting Elder had the saloon people to draw upon and so had plenty of money. Two Citizens Party workers, Patterson and Swisher, fell on the plan of bidding for the bunch of votes in order to deplete the Peoples campaign fund. So, w ithout any funds to back them, the Citizens Party workers offered $10 for each of the sixteen votes. Russell then went to the Peoples party for a bid. Murray McDonald and the City Marshal, Jim Harris, promptly offered $15. Russell soon came back with a license bid of $20 and obtained a raise to $25. McDonald said, "We

-258-
are not going to bid any higher. Those fellows haven't any money, and no matter what they promise, they would not pay." Nevertheless, he and one or two helpers who were bidding for the Elder ticket raised the bid to $30, and warned Russell that the other people were only bluffing and had no money.

Russell went back to the Citizens workers, and when the young men offered $35, he asked them where they would get so much money. One of the young men, lying, said, "Why the Women's Christian Temperance Union has sent us enough money to win this election. " They added, "J.R. McClure has $500 in his safe, and he can get more if it's needed." (It was said that McClure had the money, but it was his own and was not available for vote buying.) So Russell went back to the Peoples Party representatives and said, "They have the money and offered $35."

By this time, a shrewd businessman had come to the aid of the Marshal, and he said, "They are lying to you; they have no money. We will give you $35, but no more. If you want the money, get your men together and go to the city council room and stay ther e until the polls open in the morning." It was then midnight, Monday night.

The next morning, an hour after the opening of the polls, Jim Harris, the City Marshal, began leading the men two at a time to the polls, "to discharge their duty as citizens." They marched to the ballot box with tickets in their fingers held in full view until they were voted. After voting, he took them back to the council room and a paymaster gave $35 to each. Most of these men would have voted for Elder anyway -- all but one had been checked by Elder on the Peoples poll book -- but two or three would have voted for Harbaugh, with possibly one or two others. So Swisher and Patterson had accomplished what they started out to do. They had

-259-
compelled McDonald and Harris to pay over $500 for votes that really belonged to their party anyway.

The election was close, Elder being elected by a majority of four. One alderman on the Harbaugh ticket was elected, and one other was beaten by one vote. I had a detailed report of the whole transaction from one of the young men and by the "shrewd busin essman" who closed the deal with Russell.

Soon after this, in the Altgeld administration, the secret ballot law was passed, and wholesale vote buying became a thing of the past.

George Brosam had become an alderman in 1891, and was the most active figure in the Elder administration. During Elder's term, a franchise was granted to John H. Baker for an electric light and power service, and a contract for street lights. Alderman B rosam first proposed that the city build and operate the plant. However, William A. Steele, a banker who was then considered a great financier by everyone, took the lead in the opposition to a municipal electric plant. He said it could not be financed.< P> So in February 1892 a franchise was granted and a contract made with John H. Baker, who, it was said, borrowed the money to build the plant from Murray McDonald with a private agreement that at the end of the first year, the note would be credited with on e-half payment, and McDonald was to become the owner of a one-half interest. Instead, Baker raised the money to pay off the note and remained sole owner. This resulted in an abiding coolness between Baker and McDonald.

In 1893, a strong citizens organization was formed, and as a result Alderman George Brosam was nominated for

-260-
mayor. J.H. Baker was not consulted by the leaders of the Citizens Party, and he and some others decided to nominate a Democrat party ticket. Ex-Mayor Walter Eden, who had returned from California, was nominated. But Brosam was a Democrat and received enough votes from the party to secure his election.

Mayor Brosam had become an enthusiast for public improvement, and he proposed a plan for street pavement, beginning with the streets around the square. But the council was divided half and half on the proposition. Alderman James Dedman led in the fight for improvement, and Alderman Robert M. Peadro, a persistent fighter, led the opposition. They fought over every step for more than a year until the job was completed, approved and paid for. Mayor Brosam cast the deciding vote on each question. The fig ht grew so bitter that the divided council disputed about everything. One time, the Mayor and Alderman Dedman were absent, and Alderman Peadro was chosen temporary Mayor. He proceeded to discharge the City Marshal and appoint another who was confirmed, with Peadro voting as Alderman for the confirmation. It was a month or more before Brosam got the matter straightened out by the reappointment of the old Marshal.

Another time, over a mere formality, the opposition bristled up for a fight while Dedman was on a Michigan hunting trip. Brosam went to Michigan and brought the Alderman home, driving in only a few minutes before the time set for the meeting.

The last bricks were laid on the first paving job on Christmas Eve, 1894. Only the four streets around the Court House square with the crossing intersections were included in this paving contract. But bigger plans were made for the next year.

-261-
In the 1895 election, the people opposed to Brosam united upon Alpheus Kemper Campbell as a candidate. He was popular, while Brosam's aggressiveness had aroused some opposition. So Campbell was elected at the head of a Peoples ticket.

During the campaign, Mayor Campbell had found it necessary to promise a continuation of the work of street paving which had been inaugurated by Mayor Brosam. So in 1895 a contract was let for the paving of Harrison Street from the public square to the ra ilroad station. This ended the street paving for a few years. Some work was done in the improvement of the water plant. New wells were drilled on the lot where the light and water building is now located, and steam pumps were installed to replace the p ower of the old windmill, and a steel tank replaced the old wooden one.

The excitement of the Bryan presidential campaign in 1896 was so intense that the Democrats decided to nominate a party ticket for the city election in 1897. J.H. Baker and his friends were in full control of the party organization. In fact, Baker's inf luence had been dominant in the city since 1895, although Mayor Campbell was a Republican. Campbell did not run for re-election. Baker proposed another candidate, who withdrew before the primary, leaving ex-Mayor Brosam, who had been defeated for re-ele ction in 1895, without opposition. Brosam was thus nominated and elected in 1897, and has the credit of granting the first franchise for a telephone exchange, and also for the establishment of our public library in 1898.

There had been a small circulating library of two or three hundred volumes established by private subscription and donation. These books were given to the new library, and for ten years thereafter the library was run as a free

-262-
circulating library. Space was rented in the city book store, and E.E. Barber, the owner, acted as librarian without compensation. This arrangement allowed the library to use nearly all the revenue to buy books. After ten years, better quarters were pro vided, a librarian elected, and a reading room was opened.

In 1899, the Democrats chose Isaac Hudson as their candidate for Mayor. He had been elected county judge four years earlier on the Republican ticket, but he had supported Bryan on his free silver platform, and was now an active Democrat. Hudson was elec ted in May, and things began to happen. His term was the most violently factional period in our civic history.

During the administration of Mayor Hudson, 1899-1901, the so-called Baker machine was in full control. There were open charges of corruption, but the Mayor does not appear to have been involved; and the evidence is to the contrary. Louis K. Scott, then County Clerk, was a member of the Council during the first year of Hudson's term. He told some of his friends, confidentially, that four of the six aldermen had formed a plot to vote payment of claims or accounts authorized by themselves without previous authority or action of the Council. When Scott, or the Mayor, or Alderman Swisher, objected to the payment of a claim or asked for an explanation, the other four would sit silent until the question was put to a vote, and they would then all vote for it.

The City Attorney appeared to defend the silent four. He and the Mayor passed some angry words, and even some pugilistic blows in one of their discussions. Two Aldermen stood with the Mayor in opposition to the silent four. They were L.K. Scott, who th en held the office of County Clerk, and Charles J. Swisher. This situation was ended at the end

-263-
of the first year of the term by the defeat or retirement of three of the silent four. (The facts for this recital were given to me and E.K. Silver, Circuit Clerk, confidentially by Mr. Scott.)

But the most unfortunate action of the Council had the united support of the Mayor and all the Aldermen. Baker had obtained his light franchise in 1891, to run for 20 years, and his contract for street lighting had been signed and sealed in February 1892 , to run 10 years. It was expected that the Mayor and Council to be elected in 1901 would renew or modify the street lighting contract.

But Baker had full control of this administration, and he feared the next one might not be so favorable to his plans. The Mayor and Aldermen were "willin," and so a new contract was made, and a new and revised franchise was granted, although the old fran chise would not expire for 12 years and the old contract had more than two years to run.

Queer sessions began to be held. When the business of an evening meeting of the Council was finished, a quorum of the Council would remain seated until all visitors had gone away, when the secret business of considering the renewal of the light contract and the passage of another ordinance would be considered. Sometimes a recess was taken to another date, when a closed and secret meeting would be held.

These maneuvers resulted finally in a new ordinance to run 50 years, with all the provisions such as Mr. Baker wanted, and with nothing to protect the public interest.

The new contract was placed on record, but the new franchise could not be found, although the record of its adoption appeared in the proceedings of the Council.

-264-
In the old contract, the cost of street lighting was fixed at $80 per annum for each lamp. There were only 20 lamps provided by the first contract, although a provision was made for adding other lamps at the same cost by action of the Council. The new c ontract specified 40 lamps at $90 each, others to be added at the same cost.

The new fifty-year franchise was not yet made public. Baker was said to have the original paper in his possession, and the record could not be found. When the next administration got possession of the records, it was found that the franchise had been re corded on a blank leaf far in advance of the current record of proceedings and had not been indexed.

This new contract was regarded as unfavorable to the public interest; and the new, so-far secret, franchise provided more excitement and indignant criticism than any other public question had ever done. An organization of citizens was formed to contest i n court the validity of the new contract and the new franchise. Injunction suits were started in the circuit court, and the cases were later taken to the Supreme Court on appeal. It was two or three years before final decisions were made. The Citizens group won in both causes.

In the meantime, city politics were at the boiling point. Baker's interests were defended by the political party whose organization he controlled. In 1900 an election was held for three aldermen. The Baker party put up a Democrat ticket, and a strong C itizens group put up three independent Democrats in opposition. The Citizens won in all three wards, but in the third their candidate, Jacob Dumond, had a majority of only one over Andy Burwell, the party organization candidate.

-265-
To prepare for this election, the Baker partisans had induced several traveling salesmen and gamblers to make Sullivan their headquarters, and spend their weekends here in an effort to qualify as voters. When the polls were opened, a number of these stra ngers offered to vote. These men claimed that their home was the hotel where they had lived for more than 90 days. The hotel was in the third ward, and these interlopers presumably all voted for Burwell.

The Citizens party won the elections, but Jacob H. Dumond, their candidate in the third ward, had only a majority of one. It was here that the hotel transients had voted. The light crowd had spent too much here to admit defeat. They started an election contest against Dumond before the old Council, which canvassed the election returns. Their defeated candidate, who was a decent fellow, did not appear at the contest and did not seem to take any interest in the litigation that followed.

It would not be easy to cite another case more brazen, bold or reckless than the hearing of the contest before the Council. Two fellows who had been arrested for illegal voting on election day now came before the Council and admitted that they were mista ken about the time they began their residence at the hotel, and said they had not lived there for the full period of 90 days. When asked for whom they had voted, they said they had voted for Dumond. So the Council solemnly declared the votes illegal and deducted two votes from Dumond's tally, at the same time declaring Burwell elected.

The election was contested in court, and Burwell was enjoined from acting as Alderman until a final decision could be had. Mr. Burwell personally took no part in the controversy, and his friends knew that he disapproved of

-266-
much that was done in the matter. The case was not determined until near the end of the term, when the decision was in favor of Dumond.

However, by this time the Citizens Party had carried the elections; and by a unanimous vote of the Council, the fraudulent proceedings had been set aside, and Dumond had been declared elected. He was immediately re-elected for another term.

In 1901, the Citizens candidate, John Eden Jennings, was elected Mayor with a substantial majority over John H. Baker, who apparently was unable to induce any strong man to run for him. Mayor Jennings had throughout his term the backing of perhaps the st rongest Council that ever served the city. Jacob Dumond, John R. McClure and Walter Chase were the strong men on the finance committee.

And this committee had a job before them. In the last two administrations there had been no public improvements, and even ordinary work on streets and sidewalks had been neglected. In addition to the regular funds from taxes, the City had been collectin g $10,000 per year from saloon licenses. Yet it was found that the City owed $20,000 in outstanding warrants, most of which was held by the two banks. The mystery was never explained, and none of the old officers of the city would say anything about it. The banks agreed to accept payment in four annual installments of $5,000 each. These payments were all made as agreed.

During the same period a street light system was installed and paid for. But this was attended by strenuous warfare. Any agreement with Baker was impossible. He acted like a madman. W.A. Steele undertook to effect a compromise. He acted with the advi ce of Frank M. Harbaugh as attorney. Baker was his own attorney, though

-267-
Peadro had represented him in the litigation. But he did not think he needed a lawyer now.

Notwithstanding the decision of the court against both his new contract and his new franchise ordinance, Baker insisted upon the acceptance of both by the new Council. In the attempt at settlement the city was represented by the finance committee, Mayor Jennings and city attorney J.K. Martin [I.J. Martin's brother].

Baker was offered a new contract with the annual fee of $60 per lamp instead of the $90 which the city had continued to pay, although the old fee of $80 had been restored by the decision of the court. Baker refused this offer and refused to make any coun ter proposition for less than $90 a lamp.

As the time was approaching for the end of the first contract in February 1902, a proposition was made to Baker that a temporary extension be made by further negotiations or until the city could make other arrangements to light the streets. He told Steel e he would agree to something like that if it were put in writing.

Steele arranged for a meeting at the council rooms, and when Baker was informed of the date and place of meeting he said, "You tell those S ... of B ...'s that I will meet them nowhere but in my office." Steele said, "If that is your attitude there is no sense in having a meeting." Harbaugh, too, quit trying; and nothing further was done to bring about an agreement between Baker and the city. Among his friends, he posed as a martyr, but he was defeated only by his own folly.

Baker made no public statement of what he intended doing on the expiration date of his old contract, but early in the evening after its expiration, many of his friends appeared

-268-
uptown carrying lanterns. In the city election two months later, all the aldermanic candidates of the Citizens Party were elected by big majorities.

Steele, Harbaugh and other conservative citizens who saw the evident trend toward public ownership still hoped for a fair contract with someone. An effort to divert public attention was made by a move to obtain a Carnegie Library building, but the divers ion did not work, though a public meeting was held which was attended by no active leader of the Citizen's Party except Mayor Jennings, whose attendance was only formal.

I was editor of the Progress and while we had actively supported the Citizens, we had refrained from discussing the controversy over a contract and had said nothing in favor of a publicly owned electric plant.

Steele and Harbaugh assumed that I did not favor such a plan. Harbaugh asked me to write and publish an article showing the objections to such a plan. I told him it was useless to do so unless the city received an offer of a fair contract, but that the Progress would publish contributed articles for and against, and suggested that he write his views on the question. He declined to do so, but after a day or two he brought in a letter and said that after consulting with Steele he had changed his m ind.

His letter was published with a "reader" signature, and the next week I wrote a reply which was published with a similar signature.

The Baker-Hudson paper published a strong approval of the Harbaugh letter and complimented the Progress for its publication. This was printed the same day that the Progress published my letter, which the rival paper bitterly denounced,

-269-
saying the Progress editor was a coward for hiding behind a nom-de-plume. In this denunciation, the editor of the Progress was charged with writing both contributions and with making the first one weak that reply might be easy -- this after its fulsome praise of the Harbaugh letter.

Thus began a war of words (which now appears rather ridiculous) between the Progress and the Baker-Hudson Journal. The Progress ignored all personal attacks upon the editor but retaliated upon both Hudson and Baker with occasional ha lf concealed thrusts, and also Whitfield, who had written some editorials and whose name for a while appeared as editor.

A sample of these thrusts may be inserted here. Fifty years ago was near the end of the "full beard" period, which had been started by Lincoln in 1861. Hudson and I both wore the old style of beard. It was not very becoming, but neither of us had much advantage over the other in appearance.

In 1901-2, a woman's name appeared as publisher of the Baker organ which carried at its head "Official Organ." (The Progress said it was "Fish-oil".) No editor was named but both Baker and Hudson loafed in the office while Whitfield's Law Office wa s across the hall. The weekly "Official Organ" went to press on Wednesday afternoon as did the Progress. The Herald, the other one of the three Democratic weeklies, was a Saturday paper.

One time there was a circus in town whose main attraction was a so-called "Congress of Nations" with exhibits of Indians, Africans, Australians, etc. At noon Wednesday, Alphe Campbell, who learned the trade with the Progress, but at the time was a printer on the Herald, told me that he had

-270-
seen a galley proof of the "Official Organ" and noted an item about me that he thought I might be interested in.

It was said in the report of the circus that "some of the Australians looked like the editor of the Progress." Our Progress forms were still open and we had time to insert: "It is hardly necessary to say that no one in the circus exhibit loo ks like Ike Hudson, but one of the Indian chiefs might be Jack Baker's twin brother. Jack might join the caravan if he could be supplied with an Indian name. We suggest 'Man-Afraid-of-His-Record' unless a better one can be found."

Baker and his crowd had figured that dark streets for three months would make people demand the acceptance of his terms on a light contract, but when the Citizens candidates were all elected in April 1902, the Council promptly began work on a light plant.

The city had a building used for a pumping station. A little extension was made to give room for a long heavy belt connecting a dynamo with a steam engine. Poles and wires were erected, and street lights were well distributed over the city; and the stre et lamps were lighted a short time before the expiration of Mayor Jenning's term of office. He had declined another term and James A. Dedman in 1903 had been elected Mayor. All the costs of the new plant were settled, and half the old debt had been paid .

The Citizen's Party during these years was an ideal organization of men devoted unselfishly to the public interest. With the Mayors Jennings and Dedman there was a list of sturdy alderman: Jacob Durmond, John R. McClure, Walter Chase, Dr. S.J. Butler, To be Wolfe and J.R. Bean. Joel K. Martin was the City Attorney throughout both administrations. David Lindsay was a very efficient Clerk

-271-
and James A, Dedman was City Treasurer. The City Marshal was Charles Lansden.

But the list of officers does not show the names of all the active and effective leaders of the party. Capt. Rankin McPheeters was one of the best -- certainly the most outspoken. Frank Hoke was equally active and dependable. Dr. Malone Butler was act ive and influential, and equally valuable though quiet were J.M. Cummins, Charles Shuman, Mack Birch, Gregg R. Hawkins and a score of others.

Under the Dedman administration the work of street paving was resumed. Two blocks were paved on East Harrison Street and two on North Main, and long pavements were made as extensions of these jobs through Jackson and Worth streets to the city limits.

Dr. Andrew Denton Miller was elected Mayor in 1905, and as usual the entire city ticket was elected. The opposition party, now usually referred to as "The Gang," had been before each election collecting a campaign fund by laying a tribute upon the saloon s, and billiard halls, too, under the pretense that the Citizens Party contained all the temperance people while the patrons and supporters of the saloons made up the "Gang" party. Dr. Miller, who was not at that time a prohibitionist, was able to keep t he saloons from helping the other side.

Charley Swisher and Aaron Miller, who had been against license in the old fights and who were both members of the Baker party, now sponsored a petition for a local option vote. The real temperance people joined the movement, and the election was carried against the saloons.

The Baker party had two objects in this: punishing the saloons for withholding support, and taking $10,000 a year

-272-
from the city funds. The next year they came back to reverse the local option vote, but the Citizens Party had decided to support temperance, and the vote against the saloons was overwhelming.

Thus the city which had had saloons for a period of 60 years, except the two years of Bristow's administration (1883-85), now in 1906 voted them out and kept them out until 1933.

The Miller administration kept up the work of street paving. Hamilton Street was paved through its whole length. Water Street and West Jackson followed soon, and in the next few years the Market Street pavement was laid, and short connections were made elsewhere until the city was well supplied with good highways. This was all done in a period of about 12 years.

In 1907 Nathan C. Ellis was elected Mayor. Mr. Ellis had been a member of the Citizens Party and one of its strong leaders. There was nothing of great interest in his administration. Road improvement continued and the electric street lighting plant was operated successfully. The streets were well lighted, and the cost of maintenance was about as much as was paid Baker for service not so good. The loss of the license revenue left but little money to be spent on improvements.

In 1909 Homer Shirey was elected Mayor. His administration was troubled by an increase of liquor law violations and gambling. There was never any good remedy found for these evils, and they continued on through the period of national prohibition. But w e were never troubled by strong bootlegging gangsters as were many other communities. Our violations were by petty bootleggers, not hardened criminals.

-273-
Another trouble that was growing in importance was the deficiency of the water plant. It was about this time that we had the Rork well experience. Our city wells were nearly all of a depth of 90 or 100 feet depth. Deeper wells were no better. Mr. Rork proposed to dig a large well 20 feet in diameter and about 50 feet deep. This vat was to serve as a reservoir, and a number of holes were to be drilled to the water vein at the 90 ft. level. As it ought to have been foreseen, the well was a failure and a waste of about $3,000.

In 1911, Wm. H. Birch was elected Mayor. Apparently Mr. Birch had up to this time given little thought to city affairs. He appeared to be confused or bewildered by what was going on around him. Aaron Miller and others of the old Baker crowd became con spicuous. Miller seemed to be a sort of dispenser of privileges. There was a rivalry among "houses" that finally led to an explosion. Some two or three gamblers became informers and went voluntarily before the grand jury.

Finally Miller himself went into the grand jury room. He was asked if he knew of any gaming for money, and he said he did not, and that he had not seen any gambling in the last 18 months. As the jury previously had heard several witnesses testify that M iller was running a gaming house and as in fact, the jury had already voted to return a bill against him, they now decided to indict him for perjury. Miller was after tried in the circuit court on the perjury charge, found guilty and sentenced to serve t hree years in the penitentiary.

Nothing very creditable can be said of the Birch administration. He had been elected on a "people's" ticket. Now the old Citizens Party was reorganized and Finley

-274

Edgar Pifer* was nominated for Mayor. No candidate was nominated against him but there were contests for alderman in all three of the wards.

*Editor's note: Finley Pifer was the husband of Hattie Taylor Pifer. They adopted Ruth White, who later married Robert W. Martin, son of I.J. Martin.

The outstanding event of this administration was the acceptance of a bequest by Albert Wyman and the location and improvement of Wyman Park. There were three sites offered: the old fairground at the northwest corner of the city, a tract lying east and so uth of the cemetery, and a third tract, offered by B.W. Patterson, of timbered land lying further down on both sides of Asa Creek. This was the best tract offered, but its acceptance was opposed because it was thought to be too far out.

The six aldermen were divided equally for the three sites. O.B. Lowe and George Miller were for the site near the cemetery; Charles McClure and Charles Blackwell voted for the lower tract; and George A. Thompson and another alderman were in favor of the old fair ground. After a prolonged contest in which the six members of the council were divided in their support, a compromise was effected by the choice of a new tract offered by Joseph B. Titus, a timber tract lying just south of the last mentioned sit e.

After weeks of wrangling, the question was submitted to a vote of the people, and the Fair Ground won the election. But that made no change with the aldermen. Someone proposed the Titus tract, and four of the aldermen voted for it.


-275-
Mayor Pifer and one or two of the aldermen spent much time in the improvement of the park. It was a free contribution of service, and they did a good job, but it seemed that all the fault finders in town were around to criticize the work. Many people h ave regretted that Mr. Pifer did not live long enough to enjoy the general approval of his work.

The Council then followed the lead of Mayor Pifer in the improvement of the park. The arrangement of shade trees and drives and the formation of the lake were his ideas. And there never was a city job more criticized while doing. But after it was finis hed, the critics became silent, and Mayor Pifer deserves credit next to Albert Wyman for the creation of this fine park.

The Baker light franchise, under which light and power had been furnished to patrons in the city, had expired in 1912, and Mr. Baker had obtained signatures to a petition for a renewal. The old franchise gave the light company the right to make prices fo r services. As the Mayor and Council insisted on some limitation of the right to fix prices, Baker did not push his application, and he finally sold the light plant to the Central Illinois Public Service Company.

In 1915, the Citizens Party nominated Dr. Stonewall Johnson (who used initial letters A.W. in his signature instead of his first name). Dr. Johnson and one of the Citizen's candidates for alderman, John Eden Martin [son of I.J. Martin], declared for the enlargement of the city light plant to furnish light and power for domestic and commercial use, in addition to street lighting.

The Citizens again elected their entire ticket, and thus began a strenuous fight with the Public Service Company,

-276-
which had purchased the Baker electric plant but had no franchise for its operation.

T'he city gave the company notice to make no further extension of poles and wires in the streets and alleys, and a special ordinance was passed forbidding such trespass in the streets and fixing penalties for violation. When the company, which had headqu arters at Mattoon, began sending linemen over at midnight to put up poles and wire, arrests were made and fines imposed. The company took appeals to the Circuit Court and proceeded with further trespasses until it was involved in a long list of penalties .

Their lawyer, from Mattoon, then prepared a petition which asked the State Commission on public utilities to order the CIPS Co. to furnish light service to certain persons who signed the petition. Two of these signers were the cashiers of the two banks, Zachie Whitfield and Irving Shuman. Other signatures were not so important.

T'he State Commission promptly issued such an order. T'he CIPS attorneys then armed with this order from the State Commission, went to the Master in Chancery in Sullivan and obtained an injunction forbidding the Mayor, the Chairman of the Committee on St reets and Alleys, and the Chief of Police from interfering with linemen.

This looked like a neat job of legal planning and execution, but when the linemen showed up and began wire extensions, they soon found themselves in jail awaiting the usual ceremony in police court the next morning.

The CIPS was represented by Vauss and Kiger of Mattoon. Mr. Vauss boasted that he would show those boobs in Moultrie County (apparently the city was not worth mentioning) how to respect the courts of the land. He went

-277-
to Judge Whitfield in Decatur and obtained a citation of the Sullivan Mayor and Chief of Police for contempt of court in the violation of the injunction of the Master in Chancery. At the hearing before Judge Whitfield in Decatur there was a large attend ance of citizens of Sullivan, all in support of the Mayor, who was represented by the city attorney, Rufus Huff and E.J. Miller.

Just before the hearing began, Clarence Darrow, the famous Chicago lawyer, came into the room. Many of the Sullivan people knew he was coming, but Vauss and Kiger were completely surprised.

The two main features of the hearing were proof that the CIPS had no franchise, and proof that the Mayor and Chief of Police had acted only in the enforcement of a city ordinance.

Darrow declared that the State Commission had no authority to issue the order in the first place, and he said to Vauss, "You might as well have petitioned the Gasfitters Union in your town, and if no such union were there you could have written the order yourself and it would have been as valid as the scrap of paper from the State Commission." The decision of the judge was against the citation for contempt and for dissolving the injunction.

In the lobby of the hotel after the trial, Darrow was much amused by the recital of the story of the long fight with the CIPS Co. He said, "I think you are the most patient people I ever heard of. You know the company has no right, without a franchise, t o keep poles and wires in your streets. They should remove them instead of trying to put in more."

"It is common sense as well as common law that when anything is wrongfully in a street, anyone may rightfully

-278-
remove it. This company seems to have a preference for night work. I wonder how they would like some morning to find poles and wires neatly piled up on the side of the street. There are some places where such work would be done.

"Of course, I would not advise the Mayor or Chief of Police or anyone else to engage in a job like that. It is better to handle the matter as you are doing, but it will be more costly." (It may be mentioned here that after two or three years of litigati on, the Company gave up the fight but it had cost the city nearly $10,000.)

In 1916, the city's plant was so far improved and expanded to begin serving the people with domestic and commercial light and power. For a while, the patrons came from people who had not been using electricity, and little effort was made to get the CIPS patrons.

In the election of April 1917, the so-called Peoples Party nominated Perry J. Harsh for Mayor and a full list of other candidates, including E.D. Elder for City Attorney. Mr. Elder, as Master in Chancery, had issued the injunction against the Mayor and C hief of Police. He had become very zealous in favor of the CIPS Co. Mayor Johnson acting on the advice of F.J. Thompson (who was an undercover agent or attorney for CIPS Co.) would like to have made the campaign on other issues, regarding the light quest ion as settled. But the voters thought differently, especially when the Peoples Party began distributing circulars attacking the municipal light plant. The Citizens Party met the issue vigorously and won a complete victory. Harsh fared a little better, but Elder, the champion of the CIPS, was defeated by a vote of more than two to one.

-279-
There has never been an open fight against the Municipal light plant since, and the sly attempts to elect enemies of the system here failed almost invariably.

A free public library had been established in 1898 while George Brosam was Mayor. For ten years it had been conducted as a circulation library, and most of the funds each year were used in the purchase of books. A reading room was opened in 1908, and in 1918 the library was moved into the room now occupied. The room was built by W.A. Steel especially for the library, and after another ten years it was purchased by the city.

In 1919, Dr. Andrew Denton Miller was again chosen Mayor. He had served one term (1905-1907) fourteen years earlier. The city business in this term was only ordinary.

Miller was succeeded in 1921 by William H. Birch, who had served one term ten years earlier (1911-1913). Since that time he appeared to have grown in stature and had won the respect and confidence of many people. His second administration was a decided success. He was not afflicted by any of the hangers-on that plagued his first term. But he had been elected on the Peoples ticket and was renominated by that party for a second term. The Citizens had been the stronger party and had usually been under g ood leadership.

Mayor Birch had been against a municipal plant when it was first proposed, but he told some of his friends that after becoming Mayor and learning how beneficial it was to the city, he became heartily in favor of the municipal plan. He said he thought any honest man would be convinced as he was.

In 1923, the Citizens nominated Perry Harsh for Mayor. Six years earlier he had run on the Peoples ticket in

-280-
opposition to Mayor Johnson and against municipal ownership. He now assured some of the leaders of the Citizens party that he had changed his mind since the municipal plant had proven successful, and that if he were elected the plant would not be sold o r delivered to a private company. He did not say so publicly and he appeared to have kept his word, although after his death a few months before the end of his term strenuous efforts were made to sell the plant to the CIPS Co.

Before the death of Mayor Harsh, one of the aldermen had moved away. He was a young man who was employed as night clerk at the hotel. He was said to favor the sale of the light plant. Only five were left, and they elected Alderman McFerrin as mayor pro tem.

The CIPS Company now began an effort to seize the light plant. The City Attorney was its open champion. Suddenly, there was a sudden shut down on the light service. It was said there had been a breakdown. The manager of the plant got the CIPS to run a high tension wire into the city and supply current for the city plant. (It appears that the CIPS had kept the wire just outside ready for such an emergency.)

Alderman McFerrin, mayor pro tem, discharged the manager and appointed a new one. As the City Attorney now appeared to be acting for the CIPS, Mr. McFerrin employed another lawyer for his advisor. Two of the aldermen favored the sale of the plant, but t wo others were against a sale. These were Aldermen McFerrin and Newbould. Newbould was informed by the City Attorney that another alderman, Dr. S.J. Lewis, would vote to sell the plant if three others would so, but that he wanted four votes, which would be a majority of the full membership of the Council. There the matter stood to the end. Three men

-281-
prevented the sale (or theft) of the plant -- Alderman McFerrin, Newbould and Lewis. Of course, these aldermen had plenty of backing and encouragement outside of the Council.

Roy Patterson was elected Mayor in 1925 and reelected in 1927. A strong council served in both terms of his administration, and John Eden Jennings was appointed City Attorney for both terms. There were two outstanding improvements made in this period. O ne was an adequate water system with new wells, new water mains and a new tank reservoir. The other improvement was in the electric light and power plant. The old system of steam engines and dynamos with long and heavy drive belts were replaced by a rad ically new system.

The new equipment was paid for in five annual installments out of the net profits of the light business. The people have never been taxed for any extension, improvement, repairs or new equipment of the plant. Only the original cost of the older plant wa s purchased with proceeds of a bond issue. Even the new and enlarged building was paid out of the profits.

Besides the streets, public buildings and the park have been lighted free of cost, and power for pumping at the city wells is furnished free. Above all this free service, some profit still remains, most of which has been applied to keep the streets in go od condition.

Municipal ownership of both light and water plants has been a great success in Sullivan.

In 1929 Charles F. McFerrin, who as Alderman in the Harsh administration led in the fight to maintain municipal ownership of the light plant, was elected Mayor. For the

-282-
past four or five years the Community Club (the forerunner of the Chamber of Commerce) had been selecting candidates for Mayor and other city offices. In 1929 the Club recommended ex-Mayor Birch as a candidate for Mayor. Many citizens urged the choice of Mr. McFerrin, and Birch withdrew in his favor. McFerrin was reelected in 1931 and again in 1933. The people had adopted the Commission form of government, and McFerrin's three terms were the last under the old aldermanic form. His six year period wa s quiet and void of any sensational event, but there has not been another administration more devoted to the welfare of the city or more successful in accomplishment.

In 1935, Dr. A.D. Miller, for the third time, was chosen Mayor. He was first elected 30 years before in 1905 and again in 1919. He was the first Mayor chosen under the Commission form, and at the close of a four-year term he was re-elected in 1939.

The Board of four Commissioners elected with Dr. Miller were Ray Bupp, Walter Lane, William A. Gardner, and Dr. A.K. Merriman. The Mayor appointed William C. Ingram City Attorney. He was a member of the law firm of Thompson, White and Ingram. It was Mr . Thompson's persistence rather than personal influence that secured this appointment. It seemed to be Mr. Thompson's plan to assume a sort of management of city affairs through the intriguing skill of the City Attorney in guiding of the Council.

Thompson had a plan for a much needed system of sewage disposal. He had started work on the scheme before the city election when he had expected another candidate to be elected Mayor. One of his sons-in-law was at the time an unemployed civil engineer, and Thompson had him make a survey and draw plans and write specifications for a sewer system -- all this done without any official action of the

-283-
Council. Nothing had been omitted. One of the land owners had been advised to start a suit against the city for damages on account of cesspool drainage into Asa Creek, which ran though his premises.

It was proposed immediately after the city election to pass an ordinance and order an election for the issue of bonds: $100,000. There was little left for the Mayor and Council to do as everything had been prepared under the direction of Mr. Thompson.

At first only three commissioners seemed to understand, but after two or three meetings of the council at which Commissioner Lane had been very inquisitive and not a little troublesome, he too was let into such secrets as may have existed. The Mayor was n ever taken into the confidence of either Thompson or Ingram.

A showdown came at the meeting to open bids for bonds. No bids had been sent to the clerk, but the City Attorney had one which was opened. It offered 91 percent and one of the council expressed surprise that the bid was not lower. The Mayor said he had received a. bid which was opened and read. It offered 97 1/2 -- more than $6,000 over the other bid. A spectator reported that there was an expression of wrath around the table, more in scowls and frowns than in words. Ingram said that the bidder woul d have to be investigated to learn its reliability. The Mayor replied that as we have the certified check as a guaranty, no investigation was needed -- "All we want is the money for the bonds."

Nevertheless it was determined that the Commissioners go to Chicago and find out something.

-284-
At the next meeting of the Council, a Decatur lawyer appeared as attorney for the low bidder. There was a good audience at this meeting, apparently in protest against selling bonds to the lowest bidder. The Council formally voted to reject both bids an d re-advertise.

At the last sale neither of the old bidders appeared, and only one new bid was offered. The offer was a little below the best bid at the first sale. I think the offer was 96 percent.

After the first offer of bids was made and while it was thought that the low bid might be accepted, Jack Baker, who had good cause to be suspicious of city deals said, "I'll bet each of those commissioners will get a thousand dollars out of that deal." A friend said, "Jack, do you think Frank will let them have that much?" "Hell no, I never thought of him. I don't suppose they will get more than a hundred."

In the open meeting to consider the acceptance or rejection of bids on the bonds, there had been offered some broad hints of kick backs of commissions. Some people suspected -- a bare suspicion without any proof -- that the low bidder on the bonds had fu rnished to someone a much higher bid, and that the difference would be divided among insiders.

The Decatur lawyer asked the Mayor, "Has any one ever offered you a bribe?"

"Well, said the Mayor, "I was once offered $500."

"By anyone on behalf of these bidders?"

"No, it was on another matter and by one of the commissioners."

-285-
After everyone had gone away except the Mayor and two or three others, a correspondent for a Decatur paper said:

"Mr. Mayor, I did not get the name of the commissioner who offered you $500."

"I don't think I said, but if you had been looking closely you would have seen (name of commissioner deleted) go out of here madder than a wet hen." The Mayor explained that it was on a question of operation of gambling devices.

At the next city election there were some changes. Lane, the only Democrat on the Council, had moved away, and a Republican, L.C. Loveless, had been appointed in his place. The only Democrat in a city office was the clerk, and an effort was made to pers uade the Mayor to replace him with a Republican. Members of the Republican County Central Committee called on the Mayor and suggested that he make the city government 100 percent Republican.

Finally the county chairman came into his office and the Mayor was the first to speak. He said, "I'm telling you now that I'm not going to appoint Roy Fitzgerald clerk."

Said the chairman, "I came to say the city affairs are not a proper subject for consideration by a county committee and I hope you will appoint any one you please to appoint."

So that was that.

But the Democrats made a mistake of their own. They put in nomination a straight Democratic ticket. Dr. Merriman ran for the office of Mayor in the primary and was third. So of the old Board of Commissioners, only Bupp and Gardner remained; both were n ominated and both were

-286-
elected. Homer Shirey, a first class man whose name was on the Democratic slate, was elected Commissioner. Harold Lindley was the fourth commissioner elected.

The city business ran smoother in the second Miller administration. There was some criticism of expenses on street work and on taking money from the light earnings for general expenses. But even this practice was defended. The spending of the light fun ds to improve and enlarge the plant was criticized by those who wanted the money spent in such a way that "home people" would have a chance to get some of it.

-287-

24.
NOTES ON THE HISTORY OF SULLIVAN NEWSPAPERS*

I.J. Martin

Only three newspapers have ever become well established in Sullivan. In the order of their age they are The Progress, The News, and The Herald.

*These Notes are comprised of an article entitled "Sullivan Progress Came From Sullivan Express," reproduced in the Moultrie County News, Centennial Edition, July 5, 1973, p. 4B, and also other articles by I.J. Martin which were pub lished in The Herald.

The first Sullivan paper, The Express, was started in 1857. It was followed, rather than succeeded, as there was an interval between, by The Enterprise, which suspended publication some time in the early sixties. It is said that the first plant was used in publishing The Democrat and perhaps the early issues of The Progress. The Progress under its present name is fifty-eight years old, or nearly so, although it and its immediate predecessor, The Sullivan Democrat, has had a continuous publication since 1865, or for sixty-one years.

For a part of the time there was an opposition paper under various names such as the Okaw Banner and the Sullivan Journal, which latter paper suspended in 1884. For a number of years in the early days, Dr. B.B. Everett and his son published a paper called the Plaindealer but it ceased publication some time in the seventies.


-288-
About the time the Journal suspended in 1884, C.W. Green and Wade Hollingsworth started the publication of the Sullivan News, but they sold out the next year to J.H. Dunscomb, who changed the name to the Moultrie County News. He was an aggressive publisher and had built up a good business before he sold the paper to W.G. Covey in 1888. Mr. Covey held the record in Sullivan for the longest continuous service as editor. He was succeeded by S.T. Walker who in turn was succeeded by Mr. Arlo Chapin, the present publisher.

There have been two Democrats in the newspaper field. The first Democrat mentioned above, back in the 1860's was edited by Joseph H. Waggoner the former circuit clerk and recorder, and his brother, F.M. Waggoner, was foreman and general man ager. Phillip Shutt bought the plant in 1869 and changed the name of the paper to the Progress. Four years later he sold it to W.H. Smysor and W.J. Mize, who were the two greatest newspaper men -- barring none, present company not excepted -- tha t Sullivan has ever known. They agreed to pay $2,000 for the paper in annual installments of $500, with interest. They put a dollar each in the money drawer and from that time on their cash balance was on the right side.

About the year 1880 they purchased the Champaign Times and Mr. Smysor took charge of that paper. Mr. Mize continued in charge of the Progress until 1885 when he purchased the Decatur Review. He took A.T. and C.B. Stearns, two printe rs who had learned the trade in the Progress with him in the firm of owners of the Review under the name of W.J. Mize and Co.

In 1885 I.J. Martin bought a one third interest in the Progress, and afterwards W.W. Eden bought the remaining interest of Smysor & Mize, which interest he later sold to

-289-
Charles Shuman and A.W. Vaughan. Mr. Vaughan later retired and Martin and Shuman were the publishers until a joint stock company under the name The Progress Printing Company was formed in 1891.

Mr. Martin continued as editor until 1899 when he became manager of an abstract and title company. Mr. Martin resumed the management of the paper in 1901, and in the spring of 1912 sold the paper and plant to Irving Shuman, who was the owner for about fi ve years. During this period O.B. Lowe was for a while editor and publisher, and his energetic and courageous management and the prestige he gave the paper are well remembered. John W. Gaddis was the last manager under the Shuman regime.

In the fall of 1917 J.N. and R.W. Martin purchased the subscription list of the Progress. They were at the time owners and publishers of the Independent, which had been running a little more than a year. The paper was published by the new owners under the firm name of Martin Bros. until June 1, 1919, when it was transferred by purchase to Ed C. Brandenburger, who came to this city from Belleville where he had been business manager of Fred J. Kern's Belleville Daily and semi-weekly < I>News-Democrat.

Politically the Progress was started as an independent newspaper and has at times been Democratic and then again Independent. It has seen competitors for Democratic leadership in this county, but they have all disappeared and it remains today the only Democratic newspaper in Moultrie County.

The second paper published under the name Democrat was edited by Judge Isaac Hudson from 1899 to 1916, barring one or two short interregnums.

-290-
The Herald was started by W.T. McClure and under his management was a bright newsy paper, but it first became an important influence in community affairs in 1894 when the late John P. Lilly became the editor. While he was the editor, there were a t times influences and pressure exerted to obtain support for things he did not approve, and the writer knows how firmly he stood out against every offer of inducement. After his death, Mrs. Lilly as his successor, always kept the paper on the right side of every question. Of course The Herald may have been mistaken at times, but in the matter of sincere promotion of public welfare, its record is clean and consistent.

Editor's note: Mrs. Lilly sold the Herald newspaper and plant to John Eden Martin, the oldest son of I.J. Martin. The precise date of this sale is not known, but it appears to have been in 1919. In the spring of 1920, following the sale by the Martin family of the Progress to Ed Brandenburger, Joel Neely Martin, the second son of I.J. Martin, became associated with his older brother in the business of the Herald. The Martins, with the help of their father, I.J. Martin, conti nued to publish the newspaper and run the print shop until 1927, when the newspaper was sold to the proprietors of the other two Sullivan newspapers -- Arlo Chapin, publisher of The Moultrie County News, and Ed Brandenburger, publisher of The Su llivan Progress. As was contemplated when the sale was negotiated, the Herald then ceased publication, and subscribers received one of the other two Sullivan newspapers for the period of their unexpired subscriptions.

The last issue of the Herald contained the following statement:

"It is customary, and we are glad that it is, for newspaper publishers to express their appreciation to their readers and

-291-
patrons upon retirement from business through sale or consolidation.

"The publisher of The Herald and immediate members of his family have been connected with the newspaper business in Sullivan the greater part of the time for more than forty years. The seven years of publication of The Herald have been for the most part a pleasing and fairly profitable experience. During the time, The Herald has seen a remarkable growth in patronage from the people of the community and, we believe, increased prestige through its policy of independent thought and exp ression of views. In city, township and county affairs, the editorial policy of The Herald has been entirely independent of every consideration except what it believed to be the best interest of the community it served.

"Furthermore, the merger of the three papers into two establishments is made at the end of the most successful and prosperous year in the history of The Herald. The annual business of The Herald for the past two or three years has nearly do ubled. The total business in the year 1925 was $5670.43, which was the high mark in its career of thirty years. Yet that total was increased by nearly twenty percent this year. Our total business in 1926 exceeds $6500, besides the earnings for this wee k which are yet to be added.

"This is not published for the purpose of boasting, although we confess the figures are gratifying, but we give them to show that The Herald is put into the merger only for the purpose of enabling the publishing business to better serve the interes ts of the community. It is our belief that two papers will be more efficient than three, and if the politicians could surrender their jealous suspicions, it would be better to have only one."

-292-

25.
91 YEARS YOUNG*

Election day, November 7, will be the ninety-first birthday of I.J. Martin, who expects to celebrate it by going to the polls. He was born in 1859 to John Neely and Rachel Elvina Martin, in Whitley township, on a farm now owned by Mr. and Mrs. Mark Bucka lew. He comes from a family of Illinois pioneers, all of whom were farmers, Democrats and Hard-Shelled Baptists, and many of whom were preachers, including his grandfather and two uncles.

*Sullivan Progress, November 1950.

His great-grandfather, James Scott Martin, whom he remembers well, was born in Kentucky in 1778 during the Revolutionary war. His parents, John and Sarah Scott Martin, had come to Kentucky from the Virginia-N.Carolina border. Although probably not enlis ted in the army, John Martin fought at the battle of King's Mountain and was in many Indian battles.

James Scott Martin and five younger brothers came to Illinois, settling first near Olney. In 1820 he and two brothers came to Coles County, and in 1833 he followed his brother,, William Harvey, to Moultrie County and entered a farm a mile and a half east of Bruce. William Harvey was a preacher and in 1829 had organized the first church in Moultrie County, the Lynn Creek Baptist Church. A Methodist preacher had held services at Whitley Point in 1828 but had not organized a church.

Mr. Martin says that when he and his brother, Joel K Martin, went out to play, his mother gave them instructions much like those of a modern mother, "Don't cross the road, and don't cross the creek", but the roads were a mile apart


-293-
and the creek was a half-mile away. They often took their lunch with them and spent the day in the woods. Their father had taught them to recognize the bark on the north side of a tree, and had showed them how to find their way out of the woods by sigh ting three trees in a straight line as they walked.

He received his early education at the Whitfield school, and shortly before his seventeenth birthday, he began to teach school. For the next seven years he was occupied in teaching school and attending Lee's Academy at Loxa, where he completed the course offered by Captain Lee, a graduate of West Point.

In 1883 he became deputy county clerk under Charles Shuman, a man whom he has always revered, and of whom he says, "a better man than Charlie Shuman never lived in Moultrie County."

In 1885 he bought the Sullivan Progress, which he edited for twenty-seven years. In 1899 he bought The Moultrie Abstract Co. He is still its president, but he retired from its active management in 1941.

He was married on June 30, 1886, to Miss Rose Eden, a daughter of the Hon. John R. Eden. A few years later, his brother, J.K Martin, was married to her sister, Miss Belle Eden.

Mr. Martin has always been a student. During his childhood, there were no children's books, and at ten, he was reading, The History of All Nations, The History of the Great West, and the Morals of Seneca from his grandfather's librar y. With the first money he earned, he bought a set of encyclopedia and read it through. "That," he says, "was my college education." His interests are many -- literature, art,

-294-
history, politics and science. Although he has never been known to sing a note, he takes full credit for any musical talent his grandchildren may show. "They owe it all to me," he says. "I chose their grandmother."

Mr. Martin is in reasonably good health, has good eyesight, and an infallible memory. He spends many hours each day reading, writing and working on his scrap-books, a hobby he has followed for almost seventy-five years. He reads three daily newspapers, the local papers, the Manchester Guardian, and the Sunday New York Times. He reads also Time, Life, The Nation, Harper's, and The Atlantic. He dips into other magazines that come to the house, spurning h owever, a very popular weekly which he calls "intellectual baby food."

He recalls with great pleasure the great actors he saw years ago, Sir Henry Irving and Ellen Terry, Edmund Booth, Lawrence Barrett, Joe Jefferson, Ada Rehair, Sothern and Marlowe, and his trip to Washington for the second inaugural of Grover Cleveland, an d to the Democratic convention in Baltimore, which nominated Woodrow Wilson in 1912.

Mrs. Martin died in 1907, and in 1909 he and his children moved to the John R. Eden home, where he still lives with his daughter, Olive. One son, Joel Neely, lives in Decatur. A son, Robert W., and a nephew, J.K Martin, with their families live in Sulli van. A daughter, Mrs. William J. George, lives in St. Paul. The family of his oldest son, the late John Eden Martin, is in Memphis. He has one sister, Mrs. Nancy Harpster, who lives in Danvers, Illinois. He has eleven grandchildren and ten great-grand children, many of whom can visit him frequently.

-295-
Mr. Martin is optimistic about the future, believing that through the United Nations, his grandchildren and great-grandchildren may live to an old age in a world at peace, where the war drums throb no longer, and the battle flags are furled in the parlia ment of man, the federation of the world.

-296-

26.
SULLIVAN MAN HAS VOTED 70 YEARS
DEMOCRAT MARTIN BATTLED IN CAMPAIGNS*

By J. Neely Martin

I.J. Martin, a voter for 70 years, observed his 91st birthday in Sullivan today by voting.

*Decatur Review, November 7, 1950.

In 1880, Mr. Martin missed by three days the privilege of casting his first ballot in the Garfield-Hancock presidential election. Election day fell on Nov. 4, three days before he reached the age of 21.

Since early youth, he has been interested in politics. For many years, he was editor and publisher of The Sullivan Progress, a Democratic weekly newspaper.

While he has considered himself to be a Democrat, he was always independent and never hesitated to "split" his ballot when he thought the better candidate was on the other side.

The time he took in the voting booth today in the Sullivan armory indicated he may have done a little "scratching" of his ballot this time, also.

Until he retired several years ago, Mr. Martin was in the thick of campaigns in city elections, especially during the years in which a municipal electric plant was fighting for existence against a public utility company. A strong supporter of the municip al plant, he saw it emerge a victor in its long fight.


-297-
Mr. Martin was a school teacher at the age of 17 and throughout much of his adult life has been a member of his local school board. He was one of the sponsors of the creation of the Sullivan township high school district.

When the unit school district was organized, he was living temporarily in Decatur, but traveled to Sullivan to vote in the first election of the unit district board. For many years he was on the Sullivan public library board and selected most of the nonf iction books on the library shelves.

In 1910, Mr. Martin was the Democratic nominee for Congress in the 19th (now the 22d) district. He ran two years too soon. In 1912, the Bull Moose split of the Republican party brought the election of a Democrat to Congress.

Among his most interesting experiences in politics was his attendance at the Democratic national convention at Baltimore in 1912, which gave Woodrow Wilson his first nomination after a long, bitter and dramatic convention fight.

With his daughter, Miss Olive, a retired high school teacher, Mr. Martin lives in a large, old home which was built by his father-in-law, the late John R. Eden, Sullivan lawyer.

Mr. Martin has one of the largest private libraries in Central Illinois and passes most of his time reading. He reads the New York Times, the Chicago Sun Times and the Decatur newspapers regularly, and a select list of magazines devoted to literature, art and current affairs.

Although he has retired from all active business, he retains ownership of the Moultrie County Abstract Co.,

-298-
which is operated by his son, Robert W. Martin, and a nephew, J.K Martin.

-299-

27.
JOEL K MARTIN, ATTORNEY, DIES*

Joel K. Martin, former States Attorney of Moultrie County, and a practicing attorney for twenty-five years, died at his home three miles south of Sullivan Tuesday night shortly before midnight, after a long period of ill health. Funeral services were hel d in the home on Thursday afternoon at two o'clock conducted by Eld. E.D. Elder. Burial was made in Greenhill Cemetery.

*Undated clipping from unidentified newspaper.

The casket bearers, selected from the membership of the Moultrie county bar association were the following: J.L. McLaughlin, O.F. Cochran, F.M. Harbaugh, Homer W. Wright, C.S. Edwards and Roy B. Foster.

Joel K Martin was born in Whitley township, Moultrie County, Illinois, January 1861, the son of John Neely and Rachel E. Martin. His boyhood was spent on the farm and in the Whitfield country school. He was an active fun-loving boy and did not take his schooling very seriously until about the age of sixteen when he became an enthusiastic student. Then for a few years he had some of the best teachers in the county -- William M. Barker, George N. Snapp and J.K.P. Rose. In and out of school he studied, t houghtfully every question presented to his mind. He taught school for a few years and attended summer schools for teachers. He read law in the office of the late John R. Eden and was as painstaking and thorough in the study of the law as he was in othe r subjects. He formed a partnership with Mr. Eden and for several years, until Mr. Eden's death in 1909, this partnership was maintained although Mr. Martin lived on the Eden farm which he operated under a lease.


-300-
In 1901 he was elected City Attorney after accepting a nomination along with John Eden Jennings for mayor on the citizens ticket in opposition to the regular democratic ticket. He was still serving as City Attorney in 1908 when he was nominated for Stat es Attorney in the democratic primary. He was elected to this office in November of that year and reelected in 1912, serving two terms. At the end of his second term in 1916 he was appointed as City Attorney of Sullivan to fill a vacancy and was elected for a full term in 1917. In these years he rendered important service to the city in the litigation with the Public Service Company.

In the year 1915 he suffered from a long and severe attack of pneumonia and he never afterward recovered his former good health. In the year 1919 he went to New Mexico and he spent three years there and in California, returning to Sullivan in 1922 much i mproved in health. His health remained fairly good until four months ago when an attack of the grip left him weakened and dispirited. However, through February and March he was in town two or three times a week on business and looked after some affairs in the Probate court, but declining to undertake new business. For a month past he has remained at home although he was able to be up during the day. It was hoped that he would improve with milder weather.

Tuesday evening he retired and slept until about eleven o'clock. He died before twelve.

He was married in 1891 to Belle Eden, daughter of Mr. and Mr. John R. Eden. Seven children were born to them, four of whom with Mrs. Martin, survive. The children are Emma, the wife of R.F. Denton of Riverside, California, Grace, who is a teacher in the Sullivan schools, Edgar and Kenneth who are at home. He is also survived by two

-301-
grandchildren: Sarah Belle and Richard, son and daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Denton. He is survived also by a brother, I.J. Martin of Sullivan, and a sister, Mrs. William E. Harpster of Gays.

-302-

28.
I.J. MARTIN, 93, DIED WEDNESDAY,
BURIAL FRIDAY*

April 8, 1953

I.J. Martin, one of Sullivan's oldest and best known citizens, passed away at 2 o'clock, Wednesday morning in the Helmuth Nursing Home in Sullivan. He had been in ill health for a number of years, and had been in the nursing home since December, 1951.

*Sullivan Progress, April 10, 1953.

He was born November 7, 1859, a son of John Neeley and Rachel Elvina Martin, on a farm in Whitley Township. This place is now owned by Mr. and Mrs. Mark Buckalew. His family were pioneers in Illinois. His great-grandfather, James Scott Martin, was born in Kentucky in 1778, during the Revolutionary War, and he and five brothers came to Illinois, settling near Olney about 1820.

James Martin came to Coles County with two brothers, and in 1833, came to Moultrie where a brother, William Harvey, had previously settled near Bruce.

The first schooling for I.J. Martin was at the Whitfield School. Shortly before his 17th birthday, he began to teach school. For the next seven years, he was occupied with teaching and attending Lee's Academy at Loxa, completing the course there.

In 1883, he became deputy county clerk under Charles Shuman. In 1885, he bought the Sullivan Progress, which he edited for 27 years. In 1899, he bought the Moultrie County


-303-
Abstract Company. Although he retired from business in 1941, he maintained an active interest in it.

On June 30, 1886, he was united in marriage with Miss Rose Eden, a daughter of Hon. John R. Eden. Mrs. Martin passed away in 1907, and he and his children moved into the John R. Eden home on West Jefferson Street, where he lived until he went to the nur sing home.

He is survived by four children: Olive of Sullivan, Joel Neeley of Decatur, Robert W. of Sullivan, and Mrs. William J. George of St. Paul, Minnesota. A nephew, J.K. Martin also lives in Sullivan. He has eleven grandchildren and fifteen great-grandchildr en, and a sister, Mrs. Nancy Harpster of Danville.

Mr. Martin was always a student, and during his later years, was an authority on the history of Sullivan and Moultrie County. He read many newspapers and magazines as long as his eyesight permitted, and kept abreast with modern affairs and happenings in the world. Only in the past year or so was he unable to continue his study.

Funeral services have been set for 2 o'clock, Friday afternoon, at the McMullin Funeral Home, in charge of Rev. Walter Theobald.

-304-

| Preface | Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV |

|| Return to Main Site Index ||